Computerized mug books: Does adding multimedia help?

Journal of Applied Psychology

Volumn 82, Issue 5, 1997, Pages 688-698

  McAllister, Hunter A ^a   Bearden, Joseph N ^b   Kohlmaier, Joy R ^b   Warner, Michele D ^b  

^a SOUTHEASTERN LOUISIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031522805     PISSN: 00219010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.82.5.688     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bothwell, R. K., Deffenbacher, K. A., & Brigham, J. C. (1987). Correlations of eyewitness accuracy and confidence: Optimality hypothesis revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 691-695.
2. Brown, E., Deffenbacher, K., & Sturgill, W. (1977). Memory for faces and the circumstances of encounter. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 311-318.
3. Clede, B. (1991). Mugging made easy. Law and Order, 39, 13.
4. Cutler, B. L., Berman, G. L., Penrod, S., & Fisher, R. P. (1994). Conceptual, practical, and empirical issues associated with eyewitness identification test media. In D. F. Ross. J. D. Read, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments (pp. 163-181). New York: Cambridge University Press.
5. Cutler, B., Penrod, S. D., & Martens, T. K. (1987). Improving the reliability of eyewitness identifications: Putting context into context. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 629-637.
6. Deffenbacher, K. (1980). Eyewitness accuracy and confidence: Can we infer anything about their relationship? Law and Human Behavior, 4, 243-260.
7. Ellis, H. D., Shepherd, J. W., Shepherd, J., Flin, R. H., & Davies, G. M. (1989). Identification from a computer-driven retrieval system compared with a traditional mug-shot album search. Ergonomics, 32, 167-177.
8. Laughery, K. R., Alexander, J. F., & Lane, A. B. (1971). Recognition of human faces: Effects of target exposure time, target position, pose position, and type of photograph. Journal of Applied Psychology, 55, 477-483.
9. Laughery, K. R., Fessler, P. K., Leriorovitz, D. R., & Yoblick, D. A. (1974). Time delay and similarity effects in facial recognition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 490-496.
10. Leippe, M. R. (1980). Effects of integrative and memorial cognitive processes on the correspondence of eyewitness accuracy and confidence. Law and Human Behavior, 4, 345-351.
11. Lindsay, R. C. L., Nosworthy, G. J., Martin, R., & Martynuck, C. (1994). Using mug shots to find suspects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 121-130.
12. Lindsay, R. C. L., & Wells, G. L. (1985). Improving eyewitness identifications from lineups: Simultaneous versus sequential lineup presentation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 556-564.
13. Luus, C. A. E., & Wells, G. L. (1991). Eyewitness identification and the selection of distracters for lineups. Law and Human Behavior, 15, 43-57.
14. Luus, C. A. E., & Wells, G. L. (1994). Eyewitness identification confidence. In D. F. Ross, J. D. Read, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments (pp. 348-361). New York: Cambridge University Press.
15. Melara, R. D., Dewitt-Rickards, T. S., & O'Brien, T. P. (1989). Enhancing lineup identification accuracy: Two codes are better than one. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 706-713.
16. Neil v. Biggers, 409 U. S. 188 (1972).
17. Pavlis, J. J. (1992). Mug-shot imaging systems. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 61, 20-22.
18. Schiff, W., Banka, L., & de Bordes Galdi, G. (1986). Recognizing people seen in events via dynamic "mug shots." American Journal of Psychology, 99, 219-231.
19. Shapiro, P. N., & Penrod, S. (1986). Meta-analysis of facial identifications studies. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 139-156.
20. Tulving, E. (1979). Relations between encoding specificity and levels of processing. In L. S. Cermak & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Levels of processing in human memory (pp. 405-428). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Tulving, E., & Thompson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80, 352-373.
22. Wells, G. L. (1988). Eyewitness identification: A system handbook. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Carswell.
23. Wells, G. L. (1993). What do we know about eyewitness identification? American Psychologist, 48, 553-571.
24. Wells, G. L., & Lindsay, R. C. L. (1985). Methodological notes on the confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identification. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 413-419.
25. Wells, G. L., & Luus, C. A. E. (1990). The diagnosticity of a lineup should not be confused with the diagnostic value of nonlineup evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 511-516.
26. Wells, G. L., & Murray, D. M. (1984). Eyewitness confidence. In G. L. Wells & E. F. Loftus (Eds.), Eyewitness testimony: Psychological perspectives (pp. 155-170). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.