Developmental genes and the reconstruction of metazoan evolution - Implications of evolutionary loss, limits on inference of ancestry and type 2 errors

Integrative and Comparative Biology

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 11-18

  Jacobs, David K ^a   Gates, Ruth D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EUKARYOTA; INVERTEBRATA; METAZOA;

EID: 0043205799     PISSN: 00031569     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/icb/43.1.11     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. Anderson, D. T. 1973. Embryology and phylogeny in annelids and arthropods. Pergamon Press, Oxford.
2. Arenas-Mena, C., A. R. Cameron, and E. H. Davidson. 2000. Spatial expression of HOX cluster genes in the ontogeny of a sea urchin. Development 127:4631-4643.
3. Chamberlin, T. C. 1890. The method of multiple working hypotheses. Science 15:92-96, reprinted 1965 148:754-759.
4. Collins, A. G. 2002. Phylogeny of Medusozoa and the evolution of cnidarian life cycles. J. Evol. Biol. 15:418-432.
5. De Robertis, E. M. 1997. The ancestry of segmentation. Nature 387:25-26.
6. Doebley, J., A. Stec, and I. Hubbard. 1997. The evolution of apical dominance in maize. Nature 386:485-488.
7. Dzik, J. 1993. Early metazoan evolution and the meaning of its fossil record. In M. K. Hecht, R. J. MacIntyre, and M. T. Clegg (eds.), Evolutionary biology, pp. 339-386. New York.
8. Fitch, W. M. 1971. Toward defining the course of evolution: Minimum change for a specified tree topology. Syst. Zool. 20:406-416.
9. Garstang, W. 1928. The morphology of the Tunicate, and its bearing on the phylogeny of the Chordata. Quart. J. Microscop. Sci. 72:51-187.
10. Haun, C., J. Alexander, D. Y. Stanier, and P. G. Okkema. 1998. Rescue of Caenorhabditis elegans pharyngeal development by a vertebrate heart specification gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95:5072-5075.
11. Holland, L. Z., M. Kene, and N. D. Holland. 1997. Sequence and embryonic expression of the amphioxus engrailed gene (AmphiEn): The metameric pattern of transcription resembles that of its segment-polarity homolog in Drosophila. Development 124:1723-1732.
12. Holland, N. D., T. V. Venkatesh, L. Z. Holland, D. K. Jacobs, and R. Bodmer. 2003. AmphiNk2-tin, an amphioxus homeobox gene expressed in myocardial progenitors: Insights into evolution of the vertebrate heart. Develop. Biol. 255:128-137.
13. Jacobs, D. K., S. E. Lee, M. N. Dawson, J. L. Staton, and K. A. Raskof. 1998. The history of development through the evolution of molecules: Gene trees, hearts, eyes and dorsoventral inversion. In R. DeSalle and B. Schierwater (eds.), Molecular approaches to ecology and evolution, pp. 323-356. Birkhauser, Basel.
14. Jacobs, D. K., C. G. Wray, C. J. Wedeen, R. Kostriken, R. DeSalle, J. L. Staton, R. D. Gates, and D. R. Lindberg. 2000. Molluscan engrailed expression, serial organization, and shell evolution. Evol. Dev. 2:340-347.
15. Kinchin, I. M. 1994. The biology of Tardigrades, pp. 186. Portland Press, London.
16. Lankester, E. R. 1890. Degeneration a chapter in darwinism. In E. R. Lankester (ed.), The advancement of science, pp. 1-61. British Society for the Advancement of Science.
17. Lowe, C. J. and G. A. Wray. 1997. Radical alterations in the roles of homeobox genes during echinoderm evolution. Nature 389:718-721.
18. Moshel, S. M., M. Levine, and J. R. Collier. 1998. Shell differentiation and engrailed expression in the Ilyanassa embryo. Dev. Genes Evol. 208:135-141.
19. Nüsslein-Volhard, C. and E. Weischaus. 1980. Mutations affecting segment number and polarity in Drosophila. Nature 287:795-801.
20. Panganiban, G., S. M. Irvine, C. Lowe, H. Roehl, L. S. Corley, B. Sherbon, J. K. Grenier, J. F. Fallon, J. Kimble, M. Walker, G. A. Wray, B. J. Swalla, M. Q. Martindale, and S. B. Carroll. 1997. The origin and evolution of animal appendages. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 94:5162-5166.
21. Patel, N. H., T. B. Kornberg, and C. S. Goodman. 1989. Expression of engrailed during segmentation in grasshopper and crayfish. Development 107:201-212.
22. Peichel, C. L., K. S. Nereng, K. A. Ohgi, B. L. Cole, F. Pamela, C. A. Buerkle, D. Schluter, and D. M. Kingsley. 2001. The genetic architecture of divergence between threespine stickleback species. Nature 414:901-905.
23. Petersen, K. J., C. Arenas-Mena, and E. H. Davidson. 2000. The A/P axis in echinoderm ontogeny and evolution: Evidence from fossils and molecules. Evol. Dev. 2:93-101.
24. Ramskold, L. and X. Hou. 1991. New early Cambrian animal and onychophoran affinities of enigmatic metazoans. Nature 351:225-228.
25. Rogers, B. T. and T. C. Kaufman. 1996. Structure of the insect head as revealed by the EN protein pattern in developing embryos. Development 122:3419-3432.
26. Seaver, E. C., D. Paulson, S. Q. Irvine, and M. Q. Martindale. 2001. The spatial and temporal expression of Ch-en, the engrailed gene in the polychaete Chaetopterus does not support a role in body axis segmentation. Dev. Bio. 236:195-209.
27. Seimiya, M., Y. Watanabe, and Y. Kurosawa. 1997. Identification of POU-class homeobox genes in a freshwater sponge and the specific expression of these genes during differentiation. Eur. J. Biochem. 243:27-31.
28. Storch, V. 1984. Onychophora. In J. Bereiter-Hahn, A. G. Matoltsy, and K. S. Richards (eds.), Biology of the integument, Invertebrates, pp. 703-705. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
29. Ubaghs, G. 1975. The early Paleozoic echinoderms. Ann. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 3:79-98.
30. Wanninger, A. and G. Haszprunar. 2001. The expression of an engrailed protein during embryonic shell formation of the tusk-shell, Antalis entalis (Mollusca, Scaphopoda). Evol. Dev. 3:312-321.
31. Wedeen, C. J., R. G. Kostriken, D. Leach, and P. Whitington. 1997. Segmentally iterated expression of an engrailed-class gene in the embryo of an australian onychophoran. Dev. Genes. Evol. 207:282-286.
32. Weiner, S. and W. Traub. 1980. X-ray diffraction study of the insoluble organic matrix of Mollusk shells. FEBS Lett. 111:311-316.
33. Yuh, C., H. Bolouri, and E. H. Davidson. 2001. Cis-regulatory logic in the endo 16 gene: Switching from a specification to a differentiation mode of control. Development 128:617-629.