On the interaction between perceptual and response selection: Neuropsychological evidence

Neurocase

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 239-250

  Boutsen, Luc ^a   Humphreys, Glyn W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Frontal syndrome; Response task switching; Selection for action

Indexed keywords

CARBON MONOXIDE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BODY MOVEMENT; BRAIN INJURY; CARBON MONOXIDE INTOXICATION; CASE REPORT; COLOR; DISTRACTIBILITY; EXPERIMENTAL TEST; FRONTAL CORTEX; HAND GRIP; HUMAN; MALE; MENTAL TASK; MOTOR ACTIVITY; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; ORIENTATION; PERCEPTION; TASK PERFORMANCE; TEMPORAL CORTEX;

ADULT; ATTENTION; FRONTAL LOBE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTOR SKILLS; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0043092518     PISSN: 13554794     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1076/neur.9.3.239.15556     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Humphreys GW, Forde EME. Disordered action schema and action disorganisation syndrome. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1998; 15: 771-811.
2. Humphreys GW, Riddoch MJ. One more cup of coffee for the road: Object-action assemblies, response blocking and response capture after frontal lobe damage. Experimental Brain Research 2000; 133: 81-93.
3. Lhermitte F. "Utilisation" behaviour and its relations to lesions of the frontal lobes. Brain 1983; 106: 237-55.
4. Owen AM, Roberts AC, Hodges JR, Summers BA, Polkey CE, Robbins TW. Contrasting mechanisms of impaired attentional set-shifting in patients with frontal lobe damage or Parkinson's disease. Brain 1993; 116: 1159-75.
5. Pavese A, Buxbaum LJ. Action matters: The role of action plans and object affordances in selection for action. Visual Cognition 2002; 9: 559-90.
6. Posner MI, Petersen SE. The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience 1990; 13: 25-42.
7. Riddoch MJ, Edwards MG, Humphreys GW, West R, Heafield T. Visual affordances direct action: Neuropsychological evidence from manual interference. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1998; 15: 645-83.
8. Riddoch MJ, Humphreys GW, Edwards MG. Neuropsychological evidence distinguishing object selection from action (effector) selection. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2000a; 17: 547-62.
9. Riddoch MJ, Humphreys GW, Edwards MG. Visual affordances and object selection. In: Monsell S, Driver J, editors. Attention and Performance XVIII. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000b.
10. Shallice T. From neuropsychology to mental structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
11. Simon JR. Reaction toward the source of stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1969; 81: 174-6.
12. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics, 4th edn. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon, 2001.
13. Tipper SP, Howard LA, Jackson SR. Selective reaching to grasp: Evidence for distractor interference effects. Visual Cognition 1997; 4: 1-38.
14. Tucker M, Ellis R. On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1998; 24: 830-46.
15. Vitkovich M, Humphreys GW. Perseverant responding in speeded naming of pictures - It's in the links. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1991; 17: 664-80.