Analysis of ranked preference data using latent class models

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 201-207

  Vigneau, E ^a   Courcoux, Ph ^a   Semenou M ^a  

^a LUNAM UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

Author keywords

Incomplete rankings; Item covariates; Ranking data; Segmentation

Indexed keywords

MALVACEAE;

EID: 0043044749     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0950-3293(99)00017-8     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Alvo M., Cabilio P. On the balanced incomplete block design for rankings. The Annals of Statistics. 19(3):1991;1597-1613.
2. Babington Smith B.B. Discussion on Professor Ross's paper. J. R. Statist. Soc. B. 12:1950;53-56.
3. Bradley R.A., Terry M.E. Rank analysis of incomplete block design: the method of paired comparisons. Biometrika. 39:1952;324-345.
4. Cochran, W. G., & Cox, G. M. (1957). Experimental design. New York: Wiley.
5. Courcoux Ph., Séménou M. Preference data analysis using a paired comparison model. Food Quality and Preference. 8(5/6):1997;353-358.
6. Critchlow D.E., Fligner M.A. Paired comparison, triple comparison, and ranking experiments as generalized linear models, and their implementation on GLIM. Psychometrika. 56(3):1991;517-533.
7. Critchlow, D. E., & Fligner, M. A. (1993). Ranking models with item covariates. In M. A. Fligner, & J. S. Verducci (Eds.), Probability models and statistical analyses for ranking data (pp. 1-19). New York: Springer-Verlag.
8. Critchlow D.E., Fligner M.A., Verducci J.S. Probability Models on Rankings. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 35:1991;294-318.
9. Croon, M. A. (1989). Latent class models for the analysis of rankings. In G. De Soete, H. Feger, & K. C. Klauer (Eds.), New developments in psychological choice modeling (pp. 99-121). Amsterdam: North Holland.
10. Daniels H.E. Rank correlation and population models. Biometrika. 33:1950;129-135.
11. Diaconis, P. (1988). Group representations in probability and statistics. Hayward, CA: Institute of Mathematical Statistics.
12. Fligner M.A., Verducci J.S. Distance based ranking models. J. R. Statist. Soc. B. 48(3):1986;359-369.
13. Fligner M.A., Verducci J.S. Multi-stage ranking models. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 83:1988;892-901.
14. Luce, R. D. (1959). Individual choice behavior. New York: Wiley.
15. Kendall M.G. A new measure of rank correlation. Biometrika. 30:1938;81-93.
16. Kimmel S.A., Sigman-Grant M., Guinard J.X. Sensory testing with young children. Food Technology. 48(3):1994;92-99.
17. Mallows C.L. Non-null ranking models. I. Biometrika. 44:1957;114-130.
18. McLachlan, G. J., & Basford, K. E. (1988). Mixtures models. Inference and applications to clustering. New York: Marcel Dekker.
19. Marden, J. I. (1995). Analyzing and modeling rank data (Monographs on statistics and applied probability). London: Chapman & Hall.
20. Plackett R.L. The analysis of permutations. Applied Statistics. 24:1975;193-202.
21. Thurstone L.L. A law of comparative judgment. Psychological Review. 34:1927;273-286.