Preference data analysis using a paired comparison model

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 8, Issue 5-6, 1997, Pages 353-358

  Courcoux, Ph ^a   Semenou, M ^a  

^a LUNAM UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

Author keywords

Bradley Terry Luce; Latent class; Model; Preference data; Ranks; Segmentation

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031456311     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0950-3293(97)00004-9     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Aitkin, M., Anderson, D. and Hinde, J. (1981) Statistical modelling data on teaching styles. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 144, 419-461.
2. Ben-Akiva, M., Morikawa, T. and Shiroishi, F, (1992) Analysis of the reliability of preference ranking data. Journal of Business Research 24, 149-164.
3. Bradley, R. A. and Terry, M. E. (1952) Rank analysis of incomplete block designs: the method of paired comparisons. Biometrika 39, 324-345.
4. Bradley, R. A. (1976) Science, statistics and paired comparisons. Biometrics 32, 213-232.
5. Carroll, J. D. (1980) Models and methods for multidimensional analysis of preferential choice (or other dominance data). In Similarity and Choice., eds. E. D. Langermann and H. Feger, pp. 234-289. Huber, Bern.
6. Coombs, C. H. (1958) On the use of inconsistency of preferences in psychological measurement. Journal of Experimental Psychology 55, 1-7.
7. Courcoux, Ph. and Semenou, M. (1997) Une méthode de segmentation pour l'analyse de données issues de comparaisons par paires. Revue de Statistique Appliquée XLV(2), 59-69.
8. Critchlow, D. E. and Fligner, M. A. (1991) Paired-comparison, triple comparison, and ranking experiments as generalized linear models, and their implementation on GLIM. Psychometrika 56(3), 517-533.
9. David, H. A. (1988) The method of paired comparisons. Oxford University Press, New York.
10. De Sarbo, W. S., De Soete, G. and Eliashberg, J. (1987) A new stochastic multidimensional unfolding model for the investigation of paired comparison consumer preference/choice data. Journal of Economical Psychology 8, 357-384.
11. De Soete, G. (1990) A latent class approach to modelling pair-wise preferential choice data. In Knowledge, Data and Computer-assisted Decisions, eds. M. Schader and W. Gaul, pp. 103-113. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
12. De Soete, G. and Carroll, J. D. (1983) A maximum likelihood method for fitting the wandering vector model. Psychometrika 48(4), 553-566.
13. De Soete, G. and De Sarbo, W. S. (1991) A latent class probit model for analysing pick any/N data. Journal of Classification 8, 45-63.
14. Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M. and Rubin, D. B. (1977) Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B 39, 1-38.
15. Dillon, W. R., Kumar, A. and Smith de Borrero, M. (1993) Capturing individual differences in paired comparisons: an extended BTL model incorporating descriptor variables. Journal of Marketing Research XXX, 42-51.
16. Dykstra, O. Jr. (1956) A note on rank analysis of incomplete block designs: a method of paired comparisons employing unequal repetitions on pairs. Biometrics 12, 301-306.
17. Gacula, M. C. (1993). Design and analysis of sensory experiments. Food and Nutrition Press, Inc., Trumbull, Connecticut.
18. Gacula, M. C. and Singh, J. (1984) Statistical methods in food and consumer research. Academic Press, Inc., Orlando.
19. MacFie, H. J., Bratchell, N., Greenhoff, K. and Vallis, L. V. (1989) Designs to balance the effects of order of presentation and first-order carry-over effects in hall tests. Journal of Sensory Studies 4, 129-148.
20. Mallows, C. L. (1957) Non-null ranking models I. Biometrika 44, 114-130.
21. McLaghlan, G. L. and Basford, K. E. (1988) Mixtures models: inference and application to clustering. Marcel Dekker, New York.
22. O'Mahony, M., Masuoka, S. and Ishii, R. (1994) A theoretical note on difference tests : models, paradoxes and cognitive strategies. Journal of Sensory Studies 9, 247-272.
23. Schiffman, S. S., Reynolds, M. L. and Young, F. W. (1981) Introduction to multidimensional scaling. Theory, methods and applications. Academic Press, Inc., Orlando.
24. Schonemann, P. H. and Wang, M. M. (1972) An individual difference model for the multidimensional analysis of preference data Psychometrika 37(3), 275-309.
25. Thurstone, L. L. (1927) A law of comparative judgment. Psychological Review 34, 273-286.
26. Williams, E. J. (1949) Experimental designs balanced for the estimation of residual effects of treatments. Australian Journal of Scientific Research Ser. A. 2, 149-168.