Discrimination of Structure: II. Feature Binding

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 107-117

  George, David N ^a   Pearce, John M ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLUMBA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CONCEPT FORMATION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PIGEONS AND DOVES; PROBLEM SOLVING; VISION;

ANIMALS; COLUMBIDAE; CONCEPT FORMATION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PROBLEM SOLVING; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0043023380     PISSN: 00977403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0097-7403.29.2.107     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Blough, D. S. (1985). Discrimination of letters and random dot patterns by pigeons and humans. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 11, 261-280.
2. Cerella, J. (1977). Absence of perspective processing in the pigeon. Pattern Recognition, 9, 65-68.
3. Cerella, J. (1980). The pigeon's analysis of pictures. Pattern Recognition, 12, 1-6.
4. Cerella, J. (1986). Pigeons and perceptions. Pattern Recognition, 19, 431-438.
5. Cerella, J. (1990). Shape constancy in the pigeon: The perspective transformations decomposed. In M. L. Commons, R. J. Herrnstein, S. M. Kosslyn, & D. B. Mumford (Eds.), Quantitative analyses of behavior: Behavioral approaches to recognition and concept formation (Vol. 8, pp. 145-163). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Collett, T. S., & Zeil, J. (1998). Places and landmarks: An arthropod perspective. In S. Healy (Ed.), Spatial representation in animals (pp. 18-54). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
7. Collins, L., & Pearce, J. M. (1985). Predictive accuracy and the effects of partial reinforcement on serial autoshaping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 11, 548-564.
8. Delius, J. D., & Hollard, V. D. (1995). Orientation invariant pattern recognition by pigeons (Columba livia) and humans (Homo sapiens). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 109, 278-290.
9. Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433-458.
10. Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. (1992). Beyond the search surface: Visual search and attentional engagement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 578-588.
11. George, D. N., Ward-Robinson, J., & Pearce, J. M. (2001). Discrimination of structure: I. Implications for connectionist theories of discrimination learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 27, 206-219.
12. Gochin, P. M. (1996). The representation of shape in the temporal lobe. Behavioural Brain Research, 76, 96-116.
13. Gulliksen, H., & Wolfle, D. L. (1938a). A theory of learning and transfer: I. Psychometrika, 3, 127-149.
14. Gulliksen, H., & Wolfle, D. L. (1938b). A theory of learning and transfer: II. Psychometrika, 3, 225-251.
15. Heinemann, E., & Chase, S. (1990). A quantitative model for pattern recognition. In M. L. Commons & R. J. Herrnstein (Eds.), Computational and clinical approaches to pattern recognition and concept formation (Vol. 9, pp. 109-126). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Hollard, V. D., & Delius, J. D. (1982). Rotational invariance in pattern recognition by pigeons and humans. Science, 218, 804-806.
17. Honig, W. K., Boneau, C. A., Burstein, K. R., & Pennypacker, H. S. (1963). Positive and negative generalization gradients obtained after equivalent training conditions. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 56, 111-116.
18. Hummel, J. E., & Biederman, A. (1992). Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. Psychological Review, 99, 480-517.
19. Lindsay, P. H., & Norman, D. A. (1977). Human information processing: An introduction to psychology (2nd ed.). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
20. Logothetis, N. K., Pauls, J., Bülthoff, H. H., & Poggio, T. (1994). Viewdependent object recognition by monkeys. Current Biology, 4, 405-407.
21. Loomis, J. M. (1990). A model of character recognition and legibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 106-120.
22. Lowe, D. G. (1987). The viewpoint consistency constraint. International Journal of Computer Vision, 1, 57-72.
23. Lumsden, E. A. (1977). Generalization of an operant response to photographs and drawings/silhouettes of a three-dimensional object at various orientations. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 10, 405-407.
24. Nachmias, J. (1991). A template model of subthreshold summation. In M. S. Landy & J. A. Movshon (Eds.), Computational models of visual processing (pp. 137-145). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. Neiworth, J. J., & Rilling, M. E. (1987). A method for studying imagery in animals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 13, 203-214.
26. Palmer, S. (1999). Vision science: Photons to phenomenology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27. Pearce, J. M. (1994). Similarity and discrimination: A selective review and a connectionist model. Psychological Review, 101, 587-607.
28. Pearce, J. M., George, D. N., Redhead, E. S., Aydin, A., & Wynne, C. (1999). The influence of background stimuli on summation in autoshaping. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52B, 53-74.
29. Peissig, J. L., Young, M. E., Wasserman, E. A., & Biederman, I. (2000). Seeing things from different angles: Recognition of single geons rotated in depth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 26, 115-132.
30. Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning: II. Current research and theory (pp. 64-99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
31. Roelfsema, P. R., Engel, A. K., König, P., & Singer, W. (1996). The role of neuronal synchronization in response selection: A biologically plausible theory of structured representations in the visual cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 603-625.
32. Selfridge, O. G., & Neisser, U. (1960). Pattern recognition by machine. Scientific American, 203, 60-68.
33. Spence, K. W. (1952). The nature of the response in discrimination learning. Psychological Review, 59, 89-93.
34. Spence, K. W. (1960). Behavior theory and learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
35. Srinivasan, M. V. (1992). Distance perception in insects. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 22-26.
36. Swan, J. A., & Pearce, J. M. (1987). The influence of predictive accuracy on serial autoshaping: Evidence of orienting responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 13, 407-417.
37. Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
38. Ullman, S. (1989). Aligning pictorial descriptions: An approach to object recognition. Cognition, 32, 193-254.
39. Wagner, A. R., & Rescorla, R. A. (1972). Inhibition in Pavlovian conditioning: Application of a theory. In R. A. Boakes & M. S. Halliday (Eds.), Inhibition and learning (pp. 301-336). New York: Academic Press.
40. Wasserman, E. A., Gagliardi, J. L., Cook, B. R., Kirkpatrick-Steger, K., Astley, S. L., & Biederman, I. (1996). The pigeon's recognition of drawings of depth-rotated stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 22, 205-221.
41. Wasserman, E. A., Kirkpatrick-Steger, K., Van Hamme, L. J., & Biederman, I. (1993). Pigeons are sensitive to the spatial organization of complex visual stimuli. Psychological Science, 4, 336-341.
42. Wehner, R. (1997). Insect navigation: Low-level solutions to high-level tasks. In M. V. Srinivasan & S. Venkatesh (Eds.), From living eyes to seeing machines (pp. 158-173). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.