Density functional theory study of ethene and acetylene addition to oxazole and protonated oxazole

Journal of the Chemical Society. Perkin Transactions 2

Volumn 5, Issue , 1996, Pages 1021-1026

  Jursic, Branko S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW ORLEANS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042935622     PISSN: 03009580     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1039/p29960001021     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. G. Ya. Kondrateva, Khim. Nauka Prom., 1957, 2, 666
2. (Chem. Abstr., 1958, 52, 6345);
3. G. Ya. Kondrateva, Izv. Akad., Nauk SSSR, Ser. Khim., 1959, 484.
4. M. Ya. Karpeiskii and V. L. Florent'ev, Russ. Chem. Rev. (Engl. Ed.), 1969, 38, 540;
5. R. Lakhan and B. Ternai, Adv. Heterocycl. Chem., 1967, 17, 99;
6. D. L. Boger, Tetrahedron, 1983, 39, 2869;
7. D. L. Boger, Chem. Ber., 1986, 86, 781;
8. I. J. Turchi, Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev., 1981, 20, 32;
9. D. L. Boger and S. W. Weireb, Hetero Diels-Alder Methodology in Organic Synthesis, Academic Press, New York, 1987.
10. G. Ya. Kondrateva and C.-H. Huang, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Khim., 1961, 141, 628;
11. C.-H. Huang and G. Ya. Kondrateva, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Khim., 1962, 525;
12. T. Naito and T. Yoshikawa, Chem. Pharm. Bull. Tokyo, 1966, 14, 918;
13. T. Yoshikawa, F. Ishikawa, Y. Omura and T. Naito, Chem. Pharm. Bull. Tokyo, 1965, 13, 873;
14. T. Naito, T. Yoshikawa, F. Ishikawa and Y. Omura, Jap P 65 23 908 (Chem. Abstr., 1966, 64, 3495).
15. Daiichi Seiyaku Co., Ltd., N P 6 607 005 (Chem. Abstr., 1967, 67, 32593v).
16. S. M. Weinreb and J. I. Levin, J. Org. Chem., 1984, 49, 4325;
17. S. M. Weinreb and J. I. Levin, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1983, 105, 1397.
18. J. Gonzalez, E. C. Taylor and K. N. Houk, J. Org. Chem., 1992, 57, 3753.
19. B. S. Jursic and Z. Zdravkovski, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1994, 1877.
20. M. J. S. Dewar, E. G. Zoebisch and E. F. Healy, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1985, 107, 3902.
21. J. J. P. Stewart, MOPAC 6.0, QCPE No. 455, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, 1983.
22. GAUSSIAN 92/DFT, Revision G.2, M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel, P. M. W. Gill, B. G. Johnson, M. W. Wong, J. B. Foresman, M. A. Robb, M. Head-Gordon, E. S. Replogle, R. Gomperts, J. L. Andres, K. Raghavachari, J. S. Binkley, C. Gonzalez, R. L. Martin, D. J. Fox, D. J. Defrees, J. Baker, J. J. P. Stewart and J. A. Pople, Gaussian, Inc., Pittsburgh PA, 1993.
23. C. C. J. Roothan, Rev. Mod. Phys., 1951, 23, 69.
24. C. Møller and M. S. Plesset, Phys. Rev., 1934, 46, 618.
25. J. C. Slater, Adv. Quantum Chem., 1972, 6, 1.
26. S. H. Vosko, L. Wilk and M. Nusair, Can. J. Phys., 1980, 58, 1200.
27. A. D. Becke, J. Chem. Phys., 1993, 98, 1372.
28. C. Lee, W. Yang and R. G. Parr, Phys. Rev. B, 1988, 37, 785.
29. J. P. Perdew, Phys. Rev., 1986, 33, 8820;
30. J. P. Perdew, Phys. Rev., 1986, 34, 7408.
31. It is broadly accepted that the transition-state structure must have only one imaginary frequency. That has become the major criteria for providing the transition-state structure. For a perspective of the transition-state theory see W. J. Albery, Adv. Phys. Org. Chem., 1993, 28, 139;
32. R. A. Marcus, Science, 1992, 256, 1523;
33. I. W. M. Smith, Nature, 1992, 358, 279.
34. For an excellent discussion about direct observation of the transition state see: J. C. Polanyi and A. H. Zewail, Acc. Chem. Res., 1995, 28, 119.
35. W. J. Hehre, R. F. Stewart and J. A. Pople, J. Chem. Phys., 1969, 51, 2657.
36. W. J. Hehre, R. Ditchfield and J. A. Pople, J. Chem. Phys., 1972, 56, 2257;
37. P. C. Harihard and J. A. Pople, Theor. Chim. Acta, 1973, 28, 213;
38. M. S. Gordon, Phys. Lett., 1980, 76, 163;
39. T. Clark, J. Chadrasekhar, G. W. Spitznagel and P. v. R. Schleyer, J. Comp. Chem., 1983, 4, 294.
40. R. B. Woodward and R. Hoffman, The Conservation of Orbital Symmetry, Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, 1970;
41. K. N. Houk, Pure. Appl. Chem., 1989, 61, 643;
42. K. N. Houk, Y. Lin and J. D. Evansek, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1992, 31, 682, and references therein.
43. M. J. Dewar and C. Jie, Acc. Chem. Res., 1992, 25, 537, and references therein.
44. F. Bernardi, A. Bottoni, M. J. Field, M. F. Guest, I. H. Hillier, M. A. Robb and A. Venturini, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1988, 110, 3050.
45. K. N. Houk and Y. Li, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1993, 115, 7478.
46. R. V. Stanton and K. M. Merz, Jr., J. Chem. Phys., 1994, 100, 434;
47. J. E. Carpenter and C. Sosa, J. Mol. Struct. (Theochem.), 1994, 117, 325.
48. K. H. Houk, J. Gonzalez and Y. Li, Acc. Chem. Res., 1995, 28, 81, and references therein.
49. I. Fleming, Frontier Orbitals and Organic Reactions, Wiley, New York, 1976;
50. K. Fukui and H. Fujimoto, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 1967, 40, 2018;
51. K. Fukui and H. Fujimoto, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 1969, 42, 2018;
52. K. Fukui, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 1982, 21, 801;
53. K. N. Houk and K. Yamaguchi, 1,3-Dipolar Cycloaddition Chemistry, ed. A. Padwa, Wiley, New York, 1984, vol. 2, p. 451.
54. K. N. Houk, in Pericyclic Reactions, ed. A. P. Marchand and R. E. Lehr, Academic Press, New York, 1977, vol. II, p. 203;
55. K. N. Houk, Top. Curr. Chem., 1979, 79, 33.
56. B. S. Jursic and Z. Zdravkovski, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1995, 1223.
57. For DFT calculation of geometric parameters and dissociation energy of (Z)-NO dimer see B. S. Jursic and Z. Zdravkovski, Int. J. Quant. Chem., 1995, 54, 161.
58. Much better results were obtained with DFT hybrid methods: B. S. Jursic, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1995, 236, 206.
59. 4 see B. S. Jursic, Int. J. Quant. Chem., 1996, 58, 41.
60. For sulfur-fluorine compounds see B. S. Jursic, J. Comp. Chem., 1996, 17, 298.
61. For oxygen-fluorine compounds see B. S. Jursic, Inorg. Chem., in the press.
62. For nitrogen-fluorine compounds see B. S. Jursic, J. Chem. Phys., 1996, 104, 4151.
63. A. Kumar, J. Sheridan and O. L. Stiefvater, Z. Naturforsch., Teil A, 1978, 33, 549.
64. A. Kumar, J. Sheridan and O. L. Stiefvater, Z. Naturforsch., Teil A, 1978, 33, 146.
65. B. S. Jursic, J. Mol. Struct. (Theochem.), 1995, 358, 139.
66. A useful postulate for qualitative estimation of the reaction barrier is known as Hammond's postulate. For very exothermic reactions the transition-state structure is much closer in energy to the reactants than to the products. If two transition structures are compared for the same reaction, the one that is similar in geometry to the reactants should have lower activation barriers. For further explanation see G. S. Hammond, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1955, 77, 344.
67. For analytical functions that describe the reaction coordinates and reproduce the Hammond behaviour see W. J. Le Noble, A. R. Miller and S. D. Hamann, J. Org. Chem., 1977, 42, 338;
68. A. R. Miller, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1978, 100, 1984.
69. D. Roweley and H. Steiner, Discuss. Faraday Soc., 1951, 10, 198;
70. R. D. Bach, J. J. W. McDouall and H. B. Schlegel, J. Org. Chem., 1989, 54, 2931, and references therein.
71. K. N. Houk, R. J. Loncharich, J. F. Blake and W. J. Jorgensen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1989, 111, 9172;
72. W. L. Jorgensen, D. Lim and J. F. Blake, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1993, 115, 2936, and references therein.
73. O. Wiest, K. A. Black and K. N. Houk, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1994, 116, 10 336.
74. H. Jiao and P. v. R. Schleyer, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1995, 34, 334.