Optimal forest taxation under private and social amenity valuation

Forest Science

Volumn 49, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 596-607

  Koskela, Erkki ^a   Ollikainen, Markku ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

Forest amenities; Optimal forest taxation; Rotation age

Indexed keywords

DATA REDUCTION; SOCIAL ASPECTS; TAXATION;

FOREST TAXATION;

FORESTRY;

EID: 0042927976     PISSN: 0015749X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. AMACHER, G.S. 1999. Government preferences and public harvesting: A second-best approach. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 81:14-28.
2. AMACHER, G.S., AND R.J. BRAZEE. 1997. Designing forest taxes with varying government preferences and budget targets. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 32:323-340.
3. BINKLEY, C. 1981. Timber supply from private nonindustrial forests. Yale Univ., Sch. of For. and Environ. Stud.. Bull. No. 92.
4. BOWES, M.D., AND J. V. KRUTILLA. 1985. Multiple-use management of public forestlands. P. 531-569 in Handbook of natural resource and energy economics. Vol. II, Kneese, A.V., and J.L. Sweeney (eds.). North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
5. CALISH, S, R.D. FIGHT, AND D.E. TEEGUARDEN. 1978. How do nontimber values affect Douglas-fir rotations? J. For. 76:217-221.
6. CHANG, S.J. 1982. An economic analysis of forest taxation's impact on optimal rotation age. Land Econ. 58:310-323.
7. GAMPONIA, V., AND R. MENDELSOHN. 1987. The economic efficiency of forest taxes. For. Sci. 33:367-378.
8. ENGLIN, J.E., AND M.K. KLAN. 1990. Optimal taxation: Timber and externalities. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 18:263-275.
9. HARTMAN, R. 1976. The harvesting decision when a standing forest has value. Econ. Inquiry 14:52-58.
10. JOHANSSON, P.-O., AND K.-G. LÖFGREN. 1985. The economics of forestry and natural resources. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, United Kingdom. 292 p.
11. JOHANSSON, P.-O., AND K.-G. LÖFGREN. 1988. Where's the beef? A reply to price. J. Environ. Manage. 27:337-339.
12. KOSKELA, E., AND M. OLLIKAINEN. 1997a. Optimal desing of forest and capital income taxation in an economy with an Austrian sector. J. For. Econ. 3:107-132.
13. KOSKELA, E., AND M. OLLIKAINEN. 1997b. Optimal design of forest taxation with multiple- use characteristics of forest stands. Environ. Resour. Econ. 10:41-62.
14. KOSKELA, E., AND M. OLLIKAINEN. 1998. Tax incidence and optimal forest taxation under stochastic demand. For. Sci. 44:4-16.
15. KOSKELA, E., AND M. OLLIKAINEN. 1999. Optimal public harvesting under the interdependence of public and private forests. For. Sci. 45:259-271.
16. KOSKELA, E., AND M. OLLIKAINEN. 2001. Forest taxation and rotation age under private amenity valuation: New results. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 42:374-384.
17. KOVENOCK, D. 1986. Property and income taxation in an economy with an Austrian sector. Land Econ. 62:201-209.
18. KOVENOCK, D., AND M. ROTHSCHILD. 1983. Capital gains taxation in an economy with an Austrian sector. J. Public Econ. 21:215-256.
19. KUULUVAINEN, J., H. KARPPINEN, AND V. OVASKAINEN. 1996. Land-owner objectives and nonindustrial private timber supply. For. Sci. 42:300-309.
20. KUULUVAINEN, J., AND O. TAHVONEN. 1999. Testing the forest rotation model: Evidence from panel data. For. Sci. 45:539-551.
21. REED, W.J. 1993. 1993. The decision to conserve or harvest old-growth forest. Ecol. Econ. 8:45-69.
22. REED, W.J., AND J,J. YE. 1994. The role of stochastic monotonicity in the decision to conserve or harvest old-growth forest. Natur. Res. Model. 8:47-79.
23. SAMUELSON, P.A. 1976. Economics of forestry in an evolving society. Econ. Inquiry 4:466-492.
24. STRANG, W.J. 1983. On the optimal forest harvesting decision. Econ. Inquiry 21:756-583.
25. SWALLOW, S.K., PJ. PARKS, AND D.N. WEAR. 1990. Policy relevant nonconvexities in the production of multiple forest benefits. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 19:264-280.
26. UUSIVUORI, J. 2000. Neutrality of forestry income taxation and inheritable tax exemptions for timber capital. For. Sci. 46:219-228.