Optimal public harvesting under the interdependence of public and private forests

Forest Science

Volumn 45, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 259-271

  Koskela, Erkki ^a   Ollikainen, Markku ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Amenity valuation; Forest policy; Marginal willingness to pay

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032935065     PISSN: 0015749X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. ADAMS, D.A., R.J. ALIG, B.A. MCCARL, J.M. CALLAWAY, AND S.M. WINNETT. 1996. An analysis of the impacts of public timber harvest policies on private forest management in the United States. For. Sci. 42:343-358.
2. AMACHER, G.S. 1999. Government preferences and public harvesting. A second-best approach. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 87:14-28.
3. AMACHER, G.S., AND R.J. BRAZEE. 1997. Designing forest taxes with varying government preferences and budget targets. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 32:323-340.
4. ANDERSON, J.E. 1979. A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation. Am. Econ. Rev. 69: 106-116.
5. BEAVIS, B., AND I. DOBBS. 1990. Optimization and stability theory for economic analysis. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
6. BERCSTRAND, J.H. 1989. The generalized gravity equation, monopolistic competition, and the factor-proportions theory in international trade. Rev. Econ. Stat. 71:143-153.
7. BISHOP, R.C., P.A. CHAMP, AND D.J. MULLARKEY. 1995. Contingent valuation. In The handbook of environmental economics, Bromley, D.W. (ed.). Basil Blackwell, Cambridge, MA, and Oxford, U.K.
8. BOCKSTAEL, N.E. 1995. Travel cost models. In The Handbook of Environmental Economics. In The handbook of environmental economics, Bromley, D.W. (ed.). Basil Blackwell, Cambridge, MA, and Oxford, U.K.
9. BOWES, M.D., AND J. V. KRUTILLA. 1985. Multiple-use management of public forestlands. In Handbook of natural resource and energy economics. Vol. II. Kneese, A.V., and J.L. Sweeney (eds.). North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
10. BOWES, M.D., AND J.V. KRUTILLA. 1989. Multiple-use management: The economics of public forests. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.
11. BOYD, R.G., AND H.F. HYDE. 1989. Forestry sector intervention. The impacts of public regulation on social welfare. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa.
12. CHIPMAN, J.S. 1977. An empirical implication of Auspitz-Lieben-Edgeworth-Pareto complementarity. J. Econ. Theory 14:228-231.
13. DANIELS, S.E., W.F. HYDE, AND D.N. WEAR. 1991. Distributive effects of Forest Service attempts to maintain community stability. For. Sci. 37:245-269.
14. HARTMAN, R. 1976. The harvesting decision when a standing forest has value. Econ. Inquiry 14:52-58.
15. HYDE, W. 1980. Timber supply, land allocation, and economic efficiency. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
16. JOHANSSON, P.O., AND K.G. LÖFGREN. 1985. The economics of forestry and natural resources. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
17. KANNAI, Y. 1980. The ALEP definition of complementarity and least concave utility functions. J. Econ. Theory 22:115-117.
18. KING, M.A. 1986. A pigouvian rule for the optimum provision of public goods. J. Pub. Econ. 30:273-291.
19. KOSKELA, E., AND M. OLLIKAINEN. 1997. Optimal design of forest taxation with multiple-use characteristics of forest stands. Environ. Res. Econ. 10:41-62.
20. KOSKELA, E., AND M. OLLIKAINEN. 1998. Tax incidence and optimal forest taxation under stochastic demand. For. Sci. 44:4-16.
21. KUULUVAINEN, J., H. KARPPINEN, AND V. OVASKAINEN. 1996. Landowner objectives and nonindustrial private timber supply. For. Sci. 42:300-309.
22. MONTGOMERY, C.A., AND D.M. ADAMS. 1995. Optimal timber management policies. In Handbook of natural resource and energy economics, Vol. II. Kneese, A.V., and J.L. Sweeney (eds.). North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
23. OVASKAINEN, V. 1992, Forest taxation, timber supply, and economic efficiency. Acta Forestalia Fennica, No 233.
24. SAMUELSON, P.A. 1974. Complementarity. An essay on the 40th anniversary of the Hicks-Allen revolution in demand theory. J. Econ. Lit. 12:1255-1289.
25. STRANG, W.J. 1983. On the optimal forest harvesting decision. Econ. Inquiry 21:576-583.
26. SWALLOW, S.K., AND D.N. WEAR. 1993. Spatial interactions in multiple-use forestry and substitution and wealth effects for the single stand. J. Env. Econ. Manage. 25:103-120.
27. UNITED NATIONS ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE. 1992. The forest resources of temperate zones: The UN-ECE/FAO 1990 forest resource assesment, Vol. I and II. New York, United Nations Publications.