The influence of a shock incarceration program on inmate adjustment and attitudinal change

Journal of Criminal Justice

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 255-267

  Lutze, Faith E ^a  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042920609     PISSN: 00472352     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0047-2352(01)00088-5     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Abbott J. In the belly of the beast: letters from prison. 1981;Vintage Books, New York.
2. Bernard T., McCleary R. Life without parole: living in prison today, Victor Hassine, inmate Am4737. 1996;Roxbury Publishing, Los Angeles, CA.
3. Burns J., Anderson J., Dyson L. What disciplinary rehabilitation unit participants are saying about shock incarceration. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice. 13(2):1997;172-183.
4. Burton V., Marquart J., Cuvelier S., Alarid L., Hunter R. A study of attitudinal change among boot camp participants. Federal Probation. 57(3):1993;46-52.
5. Caldas S. Intensive incarceration programs offer hope of rehabilitation to a fortunate few: Orleans Parish Prison does an 'about face'. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. 34(1):1990;67-76.
6. Clark C., Aziz D. Shock incarceration in New York state: philosophy, results, and limitations. MacKenzie D., Hebert E. Correctional boot camps: a tough intermediate sanction. 1996;39-68 US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC.
7. Clark C., Aziz D., MacKenzie D. Shock incarceration in New York: focus on treatment. 1994;US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC.
8. Cowles E., Castellano T. Substance abuse programming in adult correctional boot camps: a national overview. MacKenzie D., Hebert E. Correctional boot camps: a tough intermediate sanction. 1996;207-232 US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC.
9. Cowles E., Castellano T., Gransky L. 'Boot camp' drug treatment and aftercare interventions: an evaluation review. 1995;Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC.
10. Ethridge P., Sorensen J. An analysis of attitudinal change and community adjustment among probationers in a county boot camp. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice. 13(2):1997;139-154.
11. Gendreau P., Ross R. Revivification of rehabilitation: evidence from the 1980s. Justice Quarterly. 4(3):1987;349-407.
12. Goffman E. Asylums: essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. 1961;Aldine Publishing, Chicago, IL.
13. Goodstadt M., Cook G., Magid S., Gruson V. The Drug Attitudes Scale (DAS): its development and evaluation. The International Journal of the Addictions. 13(8):1978;1307-1317.
14. Goodstein L., Hepburn J. Determinate sentencing and imprisonment: a failure of reform. 1985;Anderson Publishing, Cincinnati, OH.
15. Goodstein L., Wright K. Inmate adjustment to prison. Goodstein L., MacKenzie D. The American prison: issues in research and policy. 1989;229-251 Plenum, New York.
16. Irwin J. Prisons in turmoil. 1980;Little, Brown and Company, Boston, MA.
17. Irwin J., Austin J. It's about time: America's imprisonment binge. 2nd ed. 1997;Wadsworth Publishing, Belmont, CA.
18. Johnson R. Hardtime: understanding and reforming the prison. 2nd ed. 1996;Brooks/Cole Publishing, Monterey, CA.
19. Lutze F. Do boot camp prisons possess a more rehabilitative environment than traditional prison? A survey of inmates. Justice Quarterly. 15(2):1998;547-566.
20. Lutze F., Brody D. The eighth amendment and boot camp prison: mental abuse as cruel and unusual punishment. Crime and Delinquency. 45(2):1998;242-255.
21. Lutze F., Marenin O. The effectiveness of a shock incarceration program and a minimum security prison on changing attitudes towards drugs. The Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice. 13(2):1997;106-130.
22. Lutze F., Murphy D. Ultra-masculine prison environments and inmate adjustment: it is time to move beyond the "boys will be boys" paradigm. Justice Quarterly. 16(4):1999;709-733.
23. MacKenzie D. Shock incarceration as an alternative for drug offenders. MacKenzie D., Uchida C. Drug and crime: evaluating public policy initiatives. 1994;215-230 Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
24. MacKenzie D., Donaldson H. Boot camp for women offenders. Criminal Justice Review. 21(1):1996;21-43.
25. MacKenzie D., Gould L., Riechers L., Shaw J. Shock incarceration: rehabilitation or retribution? Journal of Offender Counseling, Services and Rehabilitation. 14:1989;25-40.
26. MacKenzie D., Hebert E. Correctional boot camps: a tough intermediate sanction. 1996;US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC.
27. MacKenzie D., Shaw J. Inmate adjustment and change during shock incarceration: the impact of correctional boot camp programs. Justice Quarterly. 7(1):1990;125-150.
28. MacKenzie, D., & Shaw, J. (1991). The impact of shock incarceration on technical violations and new criminal activities. A paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, San Francisco, CA.
29. MacKenzie D., Souryal C. Rehabilitation, recidivism reduction outrank punishment as main goals. Corrections Today. 53(6):1991;90-96.
30. MacKenzie D., Souryal C. Inmates' attitude change during incarceration: a comparison of boot camp with traditional prison. Justice Quarterly. 12(2):1995;324-353.
31. Marcus-Mendoza S., Klein-Saffran J., Lutze F. A feminist examination of boot camp prison programs for women. Women and Therapy. 21(1):1998;173-185.
32. McCorkle R. Correctional boot camps and change in attitude: is all this shouting necessary? A research note. Justice Quarterly. 12(2):1995;365-375.
33. Morash M., Rucker L. A critical look at the idea of boot camp as a correctional reform. Crime and Delinquency. 36(2):1990;204-222.
34. Palmer T. The re-emergence of correctional intervention. 1992;Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.
35. Parent D. Shock incarceration: an overview of existing programs. 1989;US Department of Justice, Washington, DC. National Institute of Justice Issues and Practice Report.
36. Sechrest D. Prison 'boot camps' do not measure up. Federal Probation. 53(3):1989;15-20.
37. Shoemaker D., Hillery A. Jr. Violence and commitment in custodial settings. Criminology. 18:1980;94-102.
38. Spielberger C., Gorsuch R., Lushene R. Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory. 1970;Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA.
39. Sykes G. The society of captives: a study of a maximum security prison. 1958;Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
40. Thomas C., Foster C. Prisonization in the inmate contraculture. Social Problems. 20:1972;229-329.
41. VanVoorhis P. Correctional effectiveness: the high cost of ignoring success. Federal Probation. 51:1987;56-62. March.
42. Warr P., Cook J., Wall T. Scales for the measurement of some work attitudes and aspects of psychological well-being. Journal of Occupational Psychology. 52:1979;129-148.
43. Zamble E., Porporino F. Coping, behavior, and adaption in prison inmates. 1988;Queens University, Kingston, Ontario.