An analysis of attitudinal change and community adjustment among probationers in a County boot camp

Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 139-154

  Ethridge, Philip A ^a   Sorensen, Jonathan R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS PAN AMERICAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041895468     PISSN: 10439862     EISSN: 15525406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1043986297013002004     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Austin, J., Jones, M., & Boylyard, M. (1996). A survey of jail-operated boot camps and guidelines for their implementation. In D. L. MacKenzie & E. E. Hebert (Eds.), Correctional boot camp: A tough intermediate sanction. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.
2. Cronin, C. C. (1994). Boot camps for adult and juvenile offenders: An overview and update. NIJ Research Report. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.
3. Fabelo, T. (1991). Uniform recidivism and revocation rate calculation. Austin, TX: Criminal Justice Policy Council.
4. Fabelo, T. (1996). Recidivism of offenders in community corrections: The record so far. Austin, TX: Criminal Justice Policy Council.
5. Gowdy, V. B. (1996). Historical perspective. In D. L. MacKenzie & E. E. Hebert (Eds.), Correctional boot camp: A tough intermediate sanction. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.
6. Gransky, L. A., Castellano, T. C., & Cowles, E. L. (1995). Is there a "second generation" of shock incarceration facilities? The evolving nature of goals, program elements, and drug treatment services in boot camp programs. In J. O. Smykla & W. L. Selke (Eds.), Intermediate sanctions: Sentencing in the 1990s. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
7. Lemert, E. (1951). Social pathology: A systematic approach to the theory of sociopathic behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.
8. MacKenzie, D. L. (1990). Boot camp prisons: Components, evaluations, and empirical issues. Federal Probation, 54, 44-52.
9. MacKenzie, D. L. (1993). Boot camp prisons in 1993. NIJ Reports. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.
10. MacKenzie, D. L., & Ballow, D. B. (1989). Shock incarceration programs in state correctional jurisdictions-An update. NIJ Reports. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.
11. MacKenzie, D. L., Gould, L. A., Reichers, L. M., & Shaw, J. W. (1989). Shock incarceration: Rehabilitation or retribution?Journal of Offender Counseling & Rehabilitation, 14, 25-40.
12. MacKenzie, D. L., & Hebert, E. E. (1996). Correctional boot camps: A tough intermediate sanction. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.
13. MacKenzie, D. L., & Shaw, J. W. (1990). Inmate adjustment and change during shock incarceration: The impact of correctional boot camp programs. Justice Quarterly, 7(1), 125-150.Correctional Populations in the United States, 1993. NIJ Reports
14. MacKenzie, D. L., & Souryal, C. C. (1990). Rehabilitation, recidivism reduction outrank punishment as main goals. Corrections Today, 53(6), 90-115.
15. MacKenzie, D. L., & Souryal, C. C. (1991). The parole performance of offenders released from shock incarceration (boot camp prisons): A survival time analysis. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 19(3), 225-237.
16. MacKenzie, D. L., & Souryal, C. C. (1994). Multisite evaluation of shock incarceration. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
17. Morash, M., & Rucker, L. (1990). A critical look at the idea of boot camp as a correctional reform. Crime and Delinquency, 36, 204-222.
18. Osler, M. W. (1991). Shock incarceration: Hard realities and real possibilities. Federal Probation, 55(1), 34-52.
19. Parent, D. (1989). Shock incarceration: An overview of existing programs. National Institute of Justice Issues and Practice Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
20. Reckless, W. C., Dinitz, S., & Murray, E. (1956). Self-concept as an insulator against delinquency. American Sociological Review, 21, 744-756.
21. Scheff, T. J., Retzinger, S. M., & Ryan, M. T. (1989). Crime, violence and self-esteem: Review and proposal. In A. M. Mecca, N. J. Smelser, & J. Vasconcellos (Eds.), The social importance of self-esteem. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
22. Sechrest, D. K. (1989). Prison "boot camps" do not measure up. Federal Probation, 53(3), 15-20.
23. Snell, T. L. (1995). Correctional populations in the United States, 1993. NIJ Reports. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.
24. Souryal, C., & MacKenzie, D. L. (1995). Shock incarceration and recidivism: An examination of boot camp programs in four states. In J. O. Smykla & W. L. Selke (Eds.), Intermediate sanctions: Sentencing in the 1990s. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.