Does PPP hold between Asian and Japanese economies? Evidence using panel unit root and panel cointegration

Japan and the World Economy

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 35-50

  Azali, M ^a   Habibullah, M S ^a   Baharumshah, A Z ^a  

^a Universiti P   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Asian economies; F30; Japanese economy; Panel cointegration; Panel unit root; Purchasing power parity

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042908772     PISSN: 09221425     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0922-1425(00)00055-4     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Baharumshah A.Z., Ariff M. Purchasing power parity in Southeast Asian countries economies. Asian Economic Journal. 11:1997;141-153.
2. Bahmani-Oskooee M. Purchasing power parity based on effective exchange rate and cointegration: 25 LDCs' experience with its absolute formulation. World Development. 21:1993;1023-1031.
3. Bahmani-Oskooee M., Rhee H.J. Time-series support for Balassa's productivity-bias hypothesis: evidence from Korea. Review of International Economics. 4:1996;364-370.
4. Baltagi, B.H., 1995. Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. Wiley, Singapore.
5. Bird G. Exchange rate policy in developing countries: what is left of the nominal anchor approach? Third World Quarterly. 19:1998;255-276.
6. Engle R.F., Granger C.W.J. Cointegration and error-correction: representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica. 55:1987;251-276.
7. Im, K.S., Pesaran, M.H., Shin, Y., 1997. Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels, Discussion Paper, University of Cambridge, December.
8. Johansen S., Juselius K. Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration with application on demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics. 52:1990;169-210.
9. Kim, B.J.C., 1993. Test of the long-run purchasing power parity: the case of some Pacific-Rim countries. In: Pan Pacific Business Association (Eds.), Proceedings of the Pan Pacific Conference on A Business, Economic, Technological and Educational Exchange. Beijing, pp. 370-372.
10. MacDonald R. Panel unit root tests and real exchange rates. Economics Letters. 50:1996;7-11.
11. Miyakoshi T. Productivity biases and real interest rates differentials on East-Asian real exchange rates. Asian Economic Journal. 13:1999;345-352.
12. Nagayasu, J., 1998. Does the long-run PPP hypothesis hold for Africa? evidence from panel cointegration, IMF Working Paper, WP/98/123.
13. O'Connell P.G.J. The overvaluation of purchasing power parity. Journal of International Economics. 44:1998;1-19.
14. Osterwald-Lenum M. A note with quantiles of the asymptotic distribution of the maximum likelihood cointegration rank statistics. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics. 54:1992;461-471.
15. Papell D.H. Searching for stationarity: purchasing power parity under the current float. Journal of International Economics. 43:1997;313-332.
16. Pedroni, P., 1995. Panel cointegration, asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests, with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Indiana University, Working Paper in Economics, No. 95-031, June.
17. Pedroni, P., 1997. Panel cointegration, asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests, with an application to the PPP hypothesis: new Results. Indiana University, Working Paper in Economics, November.
18. Pedroni, P., 1999. Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, in press.
19. Phillips P.C.B., Perron P. Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika. 75:1988;335-346.
20. Taylor M.P., Sarno L. The Behavior of real exchange rates during the post-Bretton Woods periods. Journal of International Economics. 46:1998;281-312.
21. Wu J. The empirical investigation of long-run purchasing power parity: The case of Taiwan exchange rates. International Economic Journal. 10:1996;59-69.