Information perspectives of the Haseman-Elston method

Human Heredity

Volumn 55, Issue 2-3, 2003, Pages 132-142

  Wright, Fred A ^a  

^a IL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; FAMILY; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENETIC MODEL; GENOTYPE PHENOTYPE CORRELATION; INFORMATION; LINKAGE ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; PHENOTYPE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SAMPLING; SIBLING; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; GENETICS, MEDICAL; HUMANS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MODELS, GENETIC; PHENOTYPE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

EID: 0042886970     PISSN: 00015652     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000072318     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Chang IS, Chen MY, Hsiao CF: A unified multi-point linkage analysis of qualitative and quantitative traits for sib-pairs. Stat Sinica 2002;12:297-309.
2. Cox DR, Hinkley DV: Theoretical Statistics. New York, Chapman and Hall, 1974, pp 1-511.
3. Drigalenko E: How sib pairs reveal linkage. Am J Hum Genet 1998;63:1242-1245.
4. Dudoit S, Speed TP: A score test for the linkage analysis of qualitative and quatitaive traits based on identity by descent data from sib-pairs. Biostatistics 2000;1:1-26.
5. Elston RC, Buxbaum S, Jacobs KB, Olson JM: Haseman and Elston revisited. Genet Epidemiol 2000;19:1-17.
6. Feingold E: Regression-based quantitative-trait-locus mapping in the 21st century. Am J Hum Genet 2002;71:217-222.
7. Forrest WF: Weighting improves the 'new Haseman-Elston' method. Hum Hered 2001;52:47-54.
8. Forrest WF, Feingold E: Composite statistics for QTL mapping with moderately discordant sibling pairs. Am J Hum Genet 2000;66:1642-1660.
9. Fulker DW, Cherny SS: An improved multipoint sib-pair analysis of quantitative traits. Behav Genet 1996;26:527-532.
10. Gaines RE, Elston RC: On the probability that a twin pair is monozygotic. Am J Hum Genet 1969;21:457-465.
11. Haseman JK, Elston RC: The investigation of linkage between a quantitative trait and a marker locus. Behav Genet 1972;2:3-19.
12. Kong A, Wright F: Asymptotic theory for gene mapping. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994;91:9705-9709.
13. Kruglyak L, Lander ES: High-resolution genetic mapping of complex traits. Am J Hum Genet 1995;56:1212-1223.
14. Liang KY, Huang CY, Beaty TH: A unified sampling approach for multipoint analysis of qualitative and quantitative traits in sib pairs. Am J Hum Genet 2000;66:1631-1641.
15. McCulloch CE, Searle SR: Generalized, Linear and Mixed Models. New York, Wiley, 2001, pp 1-325.
16. Palmer LJ, Jacobs KB, Elston RC: Haseman and Elston revisited: the effects of ascertainment and residual familial correlations on power to detect linkage. Genet Epidemiol 2000 19:456-460.
17. Pitman EJG: A note on normal correlation. Biometrika 1939;31:9-12.
18. Risch N, Zhang H: Extreme discordant sib pairs for mapping quantitative trait loci in humans. Science 1995;268:1584-1589.
19. Sen S: Confidence intervals for gene location: The effect of model misspecification and smoothing. PhD Thesis, University of Chicago Department of Statistics, 1998.
20. Sham PC, Purcell S, Cherny SS, Abecasis GR: Powerful regression-based quantitative-trait linkage analysis of general pedigrees. Am J Hum Genet 2002;71:238-253.
21. Wang D, Lin S, Cheng R, Gao X, Wright FA: Transformation of sib-pair values for the Haseman-Elston method. Am J Hum Genet 2001;68:1238-1249.
22. Wang K, Huang J: A score-statistic approach for the mapping of quantitative-trait loci with sibships of arbitrary size. Am J Hum Genet 2002;70:412-424.
23. Wright FA: The phenotypic difference discards sib-pair QTL linkage information. Am J Hum Genet 1997;60:740-742.
24. Xu X, Weiss S, Xu X, Wei LJ: A unified Haseman-Elston method for testing linkage with quantitative traits. Am J Hum Genet 2000;67:1025-1028.
25. Zhang H, Risch N: Mapping quantitative-trait loci in humans by use of extreme concordant sib pairs: selected sampling by parental phenotypes. Am J Hum Genet 1996;59:951-957.