A Pragmatic Evaluation of Three Models of Disability in Special Education

Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 343-359

  Danforth, Scot ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI ST LOUIS   (United States)

Author keywords

Models of disability; Special education

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042884268     PISSN: 1056263X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1012281312012     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Barker, R. G., Wright, B. A., and Gonick, M. R. (1946). Adjustment to Physical Handicap and Illness: A Survey of the Social Psychology of Physique and Disability, Social Science Research Council, New York.
2. Berger, P., and Luckmann, T. (1967). The Social Construction of Reality, Anchor, New York.
3. Bernstein, R. J. (1985). Dewey, democracy: The task ahead of us. In Rajchman, J., and West, C. (eds.), Post-analytic Philosophy, Columbia University Press, New York.
4. Bogdan, R., and Taylor, S. J. (1989). The social construction of humanness: Relationships with severely disabled people. Soc. Problems 36(2): 135-148.
5. Bogdan, R., and Taylor, S. J. (1994). The Social Meaning of Mental Retardation. Teachers College Press, New York.
6. Charlton, J. (1998). Nothing About Us Without Us: Disability Oppression and Empowerment, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
7. Cullinan, D., Epstein, M. H., and Lloyd, J. W. (1991). Evaluation of conceptual models of behavior disorders. Behav. Disord. 16(2): 148-157.
8. Danforth, S. (in press). Pragmatism and the scientific validation of professional practices in American special education. Disabil. Soc. 14: 6.
9. Danforth, S., and Navarro, V. (1998). Speech acts: Sampling the social construction of mental retardation in everyday life. Ment. Retard. 36(1): 31-43.
10. Danforth, S., and Rhodes, W. C. (1997). Deconstructing disability: A philosophy for inclusion. Remedial Spec. Educ. 18(6): 357-366.
11. Davis, L. J. (1997). The Disability Studies Reader, Routledge, New York.
12. Deutsch, M. (1973). The Resolution of Conflict: Constructive and Destructive Processes, Yale University Press, New Haven.
13. Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and Education, The Macmillan Company, New York.
14. Dewey, J. (1939). Freedom and Culture, Capricorn Books, New York.
15. Dewey, J. (1930). Individualism, Old and New, Minton, Balch and Company, New York.
16. Dossa, P. A. (1992). Ethnography as narrative discourse: Community integration of people with developmental disabilities. Int. J. Rehabil. Res. 15: 11-14
17. Ferguson, P. M., Ferguson, D. L., and Taylor, S. J. (eds.) (1992). Interpreting Disability: A Qualitative Reader, Teachers College Press, New York.
18. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
19. Gartner, D., and Lipsky, A. (1987). Beyond special education: Toward a quality system for all students. Harvard Educ. Rev. 57: 367-390.
20. Hahn, H. (1983). Paternalism and public policy. Society 20: 36-46.
21. Hahn, H. (1985). Introduction: Disability policy and the problem of discrimination. Am. Behav. Sci. 28(3): 293-318.
22. Hahn, H. (1987). Advertising the acceptably employable image: Disability and capitalism. Policy Stud. J. 15(3): 551-570.
23. Heward, W. L. (1996). Exceptional Children: An Introduction to Special Education, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
24. Jacobson, J. W., Mulick, J. A., and Schwartz, A. A. (1995). A history of facilitated communication: Science, pseudoscience, and anti-science. Am. Psychol. 50: 750-765.
25. Jahnukainen, M. (1999). Winners or Losers? A ten-year follow-up of twenty-three former students from special classes for the maladjusted in Finland. Young-Nordic J. Youth Res. 7(1): 36-49.
26. James, W. (1907). Pragmatism, Hackett Publishing, Indianapolis.
27. Jones, S. R. (1996). Toward inclusive theory: Disability as social construction. Naspa J. 33(4): 347-354.
28. Kauffman, J. M. (1987). Research in special education: A commentary. Remedial Spec. Educ. 8(6): 57-62.
29. Kauffman, J. M. (1999). How we prevent the prevention of emotional behavioral disorders. Except. Child. 65(4): 448-468.
30. Kauffman, J. M., and Hallahan, D. P. (1995). The Illusion of Full Inclusion : A Comprehensive Critique of a Special Education Bandwagon, Pro-Ed, Austin, TX.
31. Kauffman J. M., Lloyd, J. W., Baker, J., and Reidel, T. M. (1995). Inclusion of all students with emotional or behavioral disorders? Let's think again. Phi Delta Kappan 76(7): 542-46.
32. Kliewer, C., and Biklen, D. (1996). Labeling: Who wants to be called retarded? In Stainback, W., and Stainback, S. (eds.), Controversial Issues Confronting Special Education: Divergent Perspectives. Allyn and Bacon, Needham Heights, MA, pp. 83-95.
33. Linton, S. (1998). Claiming Disability: Knowledge and Identity, New York University Press, New York.
34. Linton, S., Mello, S., and O'Neill, J. (1995). Disability studies: Expanding the parameters of diversity. Radical Teacher 47: 4-10.
35. McDermott, R., and Varenne, H. (1995). Culture as disability. Anthropol. Educ. Q. 26(3): 325-348.
36. Mercer, J. R. (1973). Labeling the Mentally Retarded, University of California Press, Berkeley.
37. Meyerson, L. (1988). The social psychology of physical disability: 1948 and 1988. J. Soc. Issues 44(1): 173-188.
38. Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
39. Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity, Cambridge University Press, New York.
40. Rorty, R. (1991a). Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth, Cambridge University Press, New York.
41. Rorty, R. (1991b). Essays on Heidegger and Others, Cambridge University Press, New York.
42. Rorty, R. (1998). Truth and Progress, Cambridge University Press, New York.
43. Ryan, A. (1995). John Dewey and the High Tide of American Liberalism, Norton, New York.
44. Scotch, R. K. (1988). Disability as the basis for a social movement: Advocacy and the politics of definition. J. Soc. Issues 44(1): 159-172.
45. Simpson, R. L. (1995). Children and youth with autism in an age of reform: A perspective on current issues. Behav. Disord. 21(1): 7-20.
46. Skrtic, T. M. (ed.). (1996). Disability and Democracy: Reconstructing (special) Education for Postmodernity, Teachers College Press, New York.
47. Sleeter, C. (1986). Learning disabilities: The social construction of a special education category. Excep. Child. 53(1): 46-54.
48. Smelter, R. W., Rasch, B. W., and Yudewitz, G. J. (1994). Thinking of inclusion for all special needs students? Better think again. Phi Delta Kappan 76(1): 35-38.
49. Stuhr, J. J. (1993). Philosophy and the Reconstruction of Culture : Pragmatic Essays After Dewey, State University of New York Press, Albany.
50. Thomson, R. G. (1995). Integrating disability studies in the existing curriculum: The example of 'Women and Literature' at Howard University. Radical Teacher 47: 15-21.
51. Wang, M. C., Reynolds, M. C., and Walberg, H. J. (1988). Integrating the children of the second system. Phi Delta Kappan 70: 248-251.
52. West, C. (1985). The Politics of American neo-pragmatism, In Rajchman, J., and West, C. (eds.), Post-Analytic Philosophy, Columbia University Press, New York.
53. West, C. (1989). The American Evasion of Philosophy: A Genealogy of Pragmatism, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI.
54. West, C. (1993). Keeping Faith: Philosophy and Race in America, Routledge, New York.
55. Westbrook, R. B. (1991). John Dewey and American Democracy, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.