Neutron diffraction studies on aqueous solutions of glucose

Journal of Chemical Physics

Volumn 119, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 3347-3353

  Mason, P E ^a   Neilson, G W ^a   Barnes, A C ^a   Enderby, J E ^a   Brady, J W ^b   Saboungi, M L ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^b Cornell University ^*  (United States)

^c Centre Recherche Matiere Divisee   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FOURIER TRANSFORMS; HYDRATION; ISOTOPES; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NEUTRON DIFFRACTION; SATURATION (MATERIALS COMPOSITION); SOLUTIONS; SUBSTITUTION REACTIONS;

EMPIRICAL POTENTIAL STRUCTURAL REFINEMENT; ISOTOPIC SUBSTITUTION; MOLECULAR DYNAMIC SIMULATION; PLACZEK EFFECT; VOLUMETRIC CHEMISTRY;

GLUCOSE;

EID: 0042881048     PISSN: 00219606     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.1574772     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. D. Voet and J. G. Voet, Biochemistry, 2nd ed. (Wiley, New York, 1995).
2. M. Feeney, C. Brown, A. Tsai, D. Neumann, and P. G. Debenedetti, J. Phys. Chem. B 105, 7799 (2001).
3. G. W. Neilson and A. K. Adya, R. Soc. Chem. Annu. Rep. Sec. 93, 101 (1997)
4. H. Frauenfelder and P. G. Wolynes, Phys. Today 2, 58 (1994).
5. G. W. Neilson and J. E. Enderby, J. Phys. Chem. 100, 1317 (1996)
6. G. W. Neilson, P. E. Mason, S. Ramos, and D. Sullivan, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 359, 1575 (2001).
7. J. E. Wilson, S. Ansell, J. E. Enderby, and G. Neilson, Chem. Phys. Lett. 278, 21 (1997).
8. D. T. Bowron, A. K. Soper, and J. L. Finney, J. Chem. Phys. 114, 6203 (2001)
9. D. T. Bowron, J. L. Finney, and A. K. Soper, J. Phys. Chem. B 102, 3551 (1998).
10. K. S. Sidhu, J. M. Goodfellow, and J. Z. Turner, J. Chem. Phys. 110, 7943 (1999).
11. Q. Liu and J. W. Brady, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118, 12276 (1996)
12. C. Simmerling, T. Fox, and P. A. Kollman, ibid. 120, 5771 (1998).
13. K. J. Naidoo and J. W. Brady, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121, 2244 (1999).
14. J.-E. Shea and C. L. Brooks, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 52, 499 (2001)
15. W. F. van Gunsteren, R. Bürgi, C. Peter, and X. Daura, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 40, 352 (2001).
16. D. Sorous, M. A. Young, and D. L. Beveridge, J. Phys. Chem. B 102, 4658 (1998).
17. J. W. Brady, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 111, 5155 (1989)
18. C. J. Roberts and P. G. Debenedetti, J. Phys. Chem. B 103, 7308 (1999)
19. P. B. Conrad and J. J. de Pablo, J. Phys. Chem. A 103, 4049 (1999)
20. C. Branca, S. Magazù, G. Maisano, and P. Migliardo, J. Biol. Phys. 26, 295 (2000)
21. N. C. Ekdawl-Sever, P. B. Conrad, and J. J. de Pablo, J. Phys. Chem. A 105, 734 (2001).
22. R. S. Shallenberger, Advanced Sugar Chemistry: Principles of Sugar Stereochemistry (AVI Publishing Company, Inc., Westport, Connecticut, 1982).
23. A. C. Barnes, M. A. Hamilton, U. Beck, and H. E. Fischer, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 12, 7311 (2000).
24. G. L. Squires, Introduction to the Theory of Thermal Neutron Scattering (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1978).
25. It is known that the coherent component of the neutron scattering data must oscillate about the origin. The acceptable correction for the Placzek correction is, therefore, intrinsically limited to a few low-period oscillations. Due to the fact that Fourier transformation is an additive procedure, we may FT curves of similar form to our empirical correction to the data to estimate any error upon the real-space data. It is found that the empirical Placzek correction used here varies with the difference function being examined, and is generally observed to have no effect above ∼ 1.5 Å.
26. Data obtained with permission from the ISIS web site. See also K. Soper, Mol. Phys. 17, 1503 (2001).
27. A. K. Soper, Mol. Phys. 17, 1503 (2001).
28. S. J. Angyal, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 8, 157 (1969).
29. J. M. Harvey and M. C. R. Symons, J. Solution Chem. 7, 571 (1978).
30. R. H. Tromp, G. W. Neilson, and A. K. Soper, J. Chem. Phys. 96, 8460 (1992).