An overview of the major changes in the 2002 APA ethics code

Professional Psychology: Research and Practice

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 301-308

  Knapp, Samuel ^a   VandeCreek, Leon ^b  

^a Pennyslvania Psychol Association   (United States)

^b WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; BIOETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFIDENTIALITY; EDUCATION; ETHICS; FEE; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH INSURANCE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INFORMED CONSENT; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL RECORD; PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; PSYCHOLOGY; REVIEW; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; STANDARD; UNITED STATES;

AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION; BIOETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; CODES OF ETHICS; CONFIDENTIALITY; EDUCATION; ETHICS, PROFESSIONAL; FEES AND CHARGES; HEALTH INSURANCE PORTABILITY AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; MEDICAL RECORDS; PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS; PSYCHOLOGY; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIETIES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0042879983     PISSN: 07357028     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0735-7028.34.3.301     Document Type: Review

References (14)

1. American Psychological Association. (1992). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 47, 1597-1611. Available from the APA Web site: http://www.apa.org/ethics/code1992.html
2. American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 57, 1060-1073. Available from the APA Web site: http://www.apa.org/ethics/code2002.html
3. American Psychological Association, Committee on Legal Issues. (1996). Strategies for private practitioners coping with subpoenas or compelled testimony for client records or test data. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 27, 245-251.
4. Beauchamp, T., & Childress, J. (2001). Principles of biomedical ethics (5th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
5. Bersoff, D. (1994). Explicit ambiguity: The 1992 Ethics Code as an oxymoron. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 25, 382-386.
6. Caddy v. State of Florida Department of Health, Board of Psychology, 764 So. 2d 625 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000).
7. Gabbard, G. (1994). Reconsidering the American Psychological Association's policy on sex with former patients: Is it justifiable? Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 25, 329-335.
8. Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, 65 Fed. Reg. 82823 (2000a, December 28) (to be codified at 45 C.F.R. 164.524 (a) (2) (v)).
9. Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, 65 Fed. Reg. 82833 (2000b, December 28) (to be codified at 45 C.F.R. 164.524 (a) (3) (ii)).
10. Koocher, G., & Keith-Spiegel, P. (1998). Ethics in psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
11. Lakin, M. (1994). Morality in group and family therapies: Multiperson therapies and the 1992 Ethics Code. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 25, 344-348.
12. Lees-Haley, P., & Courtney, J. (2000). Disclosure of tests and raw data to the courts: A need for reform, Neuropsychology Review, 10, 169-174.
13. Newman, R. (2002, March). HIPAA: What you need to know now. Paper presented at the State Leadership Conference, Washington, DC.
14. Schoenfeld, L., Hatch, J., & Gonzalez, J. (2001). Responses of psychologists to complaints filed against them with a state licensing board. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 32, 491-495.