Responses of psychologists to complaints filed against them with a state licensing board

Professional Psychology: Research and Practice

Volumn 32, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 491-495

  Schoenfeld, Lawrence S ^a   Hatch, John P ^b   Gonzalez, Jodi M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035537372     PISSN: 07357028     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0735-7028.32.5.491     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. American Psychological Association Ethics Committee. (1953). Ethical standards of psychologists. Washington, DC: Author.
2. American Psychological Association Ethics Committee. (1999). Report of the ethics committee, 1998. American Psychologist, 54, 701-710.
3. Breslin, F., Taylor, K., & Brodsky, S. (1986). Psychological Reports, 58, 547-550.
4. Charles, S. (1986). Malpractice litigation and its impact on physicians. Current Psychiatric Therapies, 23, 173-180.
5. Charles, S., Warnecke, R., Wilbert, J., Lichtenberg, R., & DeJesus, C. (1987). Sued and nonsued physicians: Satisfactions, dissatisfactions and sources of stress. Psychosomatics, 28, 462-468.
6. Charles, S., Wilbert, J., & Franke, K. (1985). Sued and nonsued physician's self-reported reactions to malpractice litigation. American Journal of Psychiatry, 142, 437-440.
7. Floyd, M., Myszka, M., & Orr, P. (1998). Licensed psychologists' knowledge and utilization of a state association colleague assistance committee. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 29, 594-598.
8. Greenburg, S., & Greenburg, J. (1988). Malpractice litigation: Fears and facts. Psychotherapy in Private Practice, 6, 47-62.
9. Hadjistavropoulos, T., & Malloy, D. C. (1999). Ethical principles of the American Psychological Association: An argument for philosophical and practical ranking. Ethics and Behavior, 9, 127-140.
10. Hall, J., & Hare-Mustin, R. (1983). Sanctions and the diversity of ethical complaints against psychologists. American Psychologist, 38, 714-729.
11. Laliotis, D. A., & Grayson, J. H. (1985). Psychologist heal thyself: What is available for the impaired psychologist? American Psychologist, 40, 84-96.
12. Miller, R. (1992). Grievances and law suits against public mental health professionals: Cost of doing business? Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 20, 395-408.
13. Montgomery, L., Cupit, B., & Wimberley, T. (1999). Complaints, malpractice, and risk management: Professional issues and personal experiences. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 30, 402-410.
14. Moore, B. V. (1954). Cases and inquiries before the Committee on Scientific and Professional Ethics and Conduct, American Psychologist, 9, 806-807.
15. Pope, K. (1986). New trends in malpractice cases and changes in APA liability insurance. The Independent Practitioner, 6, 23-26.
16. Reaves, R. P. (2000, August). Destroying the myths about psychology regulatory boards. Paper presented at the 108th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
17. Sanders, J. (1979). Complaints against psychologists adjudicated informally by APA's committee on scientific and professional ethics and conduct. American Psychologist, 34, 1139-1144.
18. Wilbert, J., & Fulero, S. (1988). Impact of malpractice litigation on professional psychology: Survey of practitioners. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 19, 379-382.