Legal strategies in resolving domain name disputes

Industrial Management and Data Systems

Volumn 103, Issue 5-6, 2003, Pages 332-338

  Apke, Thomas M ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Disputes; Internet; Trade marks

Indexed keywords

DATABASE SYSTEMS; LEGACY SYSTEMS; TRADEMARKS; WEBSITES;

LEGAL ISSUES;

INFORMATION MANAGEMENT;

EID: 0042864557     PISSN: 02635577     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/02635570310477389     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. Advantage Rent-A-Car v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car (2001), 238 F 3d378 (5th Cir. 2001).
2. A.J. Canfield Co v. Honickman (1986), 808 F.2d291 (3rd Cir.).
3. America Online Inc. v. Huang (2000), 106 F. Supp 2d 848 (E.D. VA 2000).
4. AMF Inc. v. Sleek Craft Boats (1979), 599 F. 2d341 (9th Cir.).
5. Anti-cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA), 15 U.S.C §1125 et seq.
6. Ballon, I. (2001), E-Commerce and Internet Law: Treatise with Forms Glasser Legal Works, Glasser Legal Works, Little Falls, NJ.
7. Broad Bridge Media LLC v. Hypercd.com (2000), 106 F. Supp 2d505 (S.D.N.Y. 2000).
8. Cendali, D.M. (2001), "Legal developments in trademark law and the Internet", in Ballon, I., Levi, S. and Wong, N. (Eds), 5th Annual Internet Law Institute, Practicing Law Institute Handbook, Practicing Law Institute, New York, NY, pp. 259-330.
9. Electronics Boutique Holding Corp. v. SZuccarini (2000), 56 USPQ 2d 1705, No. 00-4055, 2000 WL 1622760 (E.D. PA Oct.).
10. Granger, M. and Schroeder, D. (1994), "Integrating the Internet into the business environment", Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 94 No. 8.
11. Hsieh, C. and Lin, B. (1998), "Internet commerce for small businesses", Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 98 No. 3.
12. ICANN (1999), "Uniform domain dispute resolution policy of 1999", available at: www.icann.org/udrp/udrp-policy-24oct99.htm
13. ICANN (2002), "FAQ, 'new TLD program'", available at: www.ican.org/tlds/htm (accessed January 2002).
14. ICANN (n.d.a), "ICANN authorized dispute resolution providers", available at: www.icann.org/udrp/approved-providers.htm
15. ICANN (n.d.b), "Statistical summary of the proceedings under uniform domain name dispute resolution policy", available at: www.icann.org/udrp/proceedings-stat.htm (accessed 19 June 2002).
16. International Shoe Co. v. SWashington (1945), 326 U.S. 310.
17. Lanham Act: 15 USC §1114(1)
18. Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. SJohnson (2000), 56 U.S.P.Q. 2d 1637 (C.D. Cal 2000) and Porsche Cars of N. America Inc. v. Spenser, civ 5-00-471 GEB PAN, 55 U.S.P.Q. 2d 1026 (E.D.Cal. May).
19. Nissan Motor Co. Ltd v. SNissan Computer Corp. (2000), 89 F. Supp 2d1154 (C.D. Cal).
20. Palumbo, F. and Herbig, P. (1998), "International marketing tool: the Internet", Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 98 No. 6.
21. Prescott, M. (1997), "Understanding the Internet as an innovation", Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 97 No. 3.
22. Panavision International v. Toeppen (1998), 141 F.3d 1316 (9th Cir).
23. WIPO (n.d.), available at: www.wipo.int/domains/statistics.results.html (accessed 19 June 2002).
24. World Wrestling Federation Entertainment Inc. v. Bossman (1999), Case No. D 99-0001 (WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Ctr. Dec. 9, 1999).
25. Zippo Mfg. Co. v. Zippodot.com (1997), 952 F. Supp 1119 (W.D. PA).