Using combined research methods for exploring diabetes patient education

Patient Education and Counseling

Volumn 51, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 45-52

  Cooper, Helen ^a   Booth, Katie ^b   Gill, Geoff ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^c Department of Radiology   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Combined research methods; Complex interventions; Diabetes; Patient education

Indexed keywords

ANTIDIABETIC AGENT; INSULIN;

ADULT; AGED; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; BODY WEIGHT; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PATIENT EDUCATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE;

EID: 0042855873     PISSN: 07383991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0738-3991(02)00265-3     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Amos A.T., McCarty D.J., Zimmet P. The rising global burden of diabetes and its complications: estimated predictions to the year 2010. Diabet. Med. 14(Suppl. 5):1997;S1-S85.
2. Turner R., Cull C., Holman R.R. United Kingdom prospective diabetes study 17: a 9-year update of randomised controlled trials on the effect of improved metabolic control on complications in non-insulin controlled diabetes. Ann. Int. Med. 124:1996;136-145.
3. Audit Commission. Testing times: a review of diabetes services in England and Wales. The Audit Commission for local authorities and the National Health Service in England and Wales, London; 2000.
4. Cooper H., Booth K., Fear S., Gill G. Lessons from chronic disease patient education. Patient Educ. Couns. 44:2001;107-117.
5. Griffin S, Kinmouth AL, Skinner C, Kelly J. Educational and psychosocial interventions for adults with diabetes article (online), March 1999. Summary of report available on: http://www.diabetes.org.uk .
6. Roter D.L., Hall J.A., Merisca R., Nordstrom B., Cretin D., Svarstad B. Effectiveness of interventions to improve patient compliance: a meta-analysis. Med. Care. 36:1998;1138-1161.
7. Skinner T.C., Cradock S. Empowerment: what about the evidence? Pract. Diab. Int. 17:2000;91-95.
8. Campbell M., Fitzpatrick R., Haines A., Kinmonth A.L.et al. Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. Br. Med. J. 321:2000;694-696.
9. Cooper H, Booth K, Fear S, Gill G. Patients' perspectives on diabetes health care education. Health Educ Res 2003;18:101-16.
10. Bradley C. Designing medical and educational intervention studies. Diabetes Care. 16:1993;509-518.
11. Cook DC, Campbell DT. Quasi-experimentation: design and analysis issues for field settings. Boston MA, USA: Houghton Miffllin; 1979.
12. Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. Handbook of qualitative research. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage; 1994.
13. Livta A., Eyles J. Coming out: exposing social theory in medical geography. Health Place. 1:1995;5-14.
14. Blumer H. Symbolic interactionism: perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1969.
15. Mead GH. Mind, self and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1962.
16. Bryman A. Quantity and quality in social research. London: Routledge; 1988.
17. Sandelowski M. Combining qualitative and quantitative sampling, data collection, and analysis techniques in mixed-methods studies. Res. Nurs. Health. 23:2000;246-255.
18. Welch G., Beeney L., Dunn S., Smith R.B.W. The development of the diabetes integration scale: a psychometric study of the ATT 39. Multiva Exp. Clin. R. 11:1994;75-88.
19. Glasgow R.E., Toobert D.J., Hampson S., Noell J.W. A brief office based intervention to facilitate diabetes self-management. Health Educ. Res. 10:1995;467-478.
20. Toobert DJ, Glasgow RE. Assessing diabetes self-management: the summary of diabetes self-care activities questionnaire. In: Bradley C, editor. Handbook of psychology and diabetes, vol. 15. Switzerland: Harwood; 1994. p. 351-75.
21. Brannen J. Mixing methods: qualitative and quantitative research. Aldershot: Avebury; 1992.
22. Carey J.W. Linking qualitative and quantitative methods: integrating cultural factors into public health. Qual Health Res. 3:1993;298-318.
23. Denzin NK. The art and politics of interpretation. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. Handbook of qualitative research. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage; 1994.
24. Cooper H., Booth K., Gill G. Diabetes education: the patient's perspective. J. Diabetes Nurse. 6:2002;91-95.
25. Leventhal H, Nerenz DR, Steele DJ. Illness representations and coping with health threats. In: Baum A, Taylor SE, Singer JE, editors. Handbook of psychology and health. Hillside NJ: Erlbaum; 1984.
26. Prochaska J.O., DiClemente C.C., Norcross J.C. In search of how people change: applications to addictive behaviours. Am. Psychol. 47:1992;1102-1114.
27. Costor S, Gulliford MC, Seed PT, Powrie JK, Swaminathan R. Monitoring blood glucose control in diabetes mellitus: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess 2000;4.
28. Department of Health. The expert patient: a new approach to chronic disease management for the 21st century. London: HMSO (Books); 2001.
29. Keiffer C. Citizen empowerment: a developmental perspective. Prev. Hum. Serv. 3:1984;9-36.