The role of geometric complementarity in secondary structure packing: A systematic docking study

Protein Science

Volumn 12, Issue 8, 2003, Pages 1646-1651

  Jiang, Sulin ^a   Tovchigrechko, Andrei ^b   Vakser, Ilya A ^b  

^a WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^b STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Docking; Molecular recognition; Protein folding; Protein modeling; Structural bioinformatics

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; GEOMETRY; METABOLISM; MODEL; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; THERMODYNAMICS;

BINDING SITES; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEINS; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 0042844593     PISSN: 09618368     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1110/ps.0304503     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Ausiello, G., Cesareni, G., and Helmer-Citterich, M. 1997. ESCHER: A new docking procedure applied to the reconstruction of protein tertiary structure. Proteins 28: 556-567.
2. Baker, D. and Lim, W.A. 2002. Folding and binding: From folding towards function. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 12: 11-13.
3. Chothia, C., Levitt, M., and Richardson, D. 1981. Helix to helix packing in proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 145: 215-250.
4. Cohen, F.E., Richmond, T.J., and Richards, F.M. 1979. Protein folding: Evaluation of some simple rules for the assembly of helices into tertiary structures with myoglobin as an example. J. Mol. Biol. 132: 275-288.
5. Glaser, F., Steinberg, D., Vakser, I.A., and Ben-Tal, N. 2001. Residue frequencies and pairing preferences at protein-protein interfaces. Proteins 43: 89-102.
6. Halperin, I., Ma, B., Wolfson, H., and Nussinov, R. 2002. Principles of docking: An overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions. Proteins 47: 409-443.
7. Hobohm, U. and Sander, C. 1992. Selection of a representative set of structures from the Brookhaven Protein Data Bank. Protein Sci. 1: 409-417.
8. -. 1994. Enlarged representative set of protein structures. Protein Sci. 3: 522-524.
9. Hubbard, S.J. and Argos, P. 1994. Cavities and packing at protein interfaces. Protein Sci. 3: 2194-2206.
10. Kabsch, W. and Sander, C. 1983. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 22: 2577-2637.
11. Katchalski-Katzir, E., Shariv, I., Eisenstein, M., Friesem, A.A., Aflalo, C., and Vakser, I.A. 1992. Molecular surface recognition: Determination of geometric fit between proteins and their ligands by correlation techniques. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 89: 2195-2199.
12. Keskin, O., Bahar, I., Badretdinov, A.Y., Ptitsyn, O.B., and Jernigan, R.L. 1998. Empirical solvent-mediated potentials hold for both intra-molecular and inter-molecular inter-residue interactions. Protein Sci. 7: 2578-2586.
13. Murzin, A.G. and Finkelstein, A.V. 1988. General architecture of the α-helical globule. J. Mol. Biol. 204: 749-769.
14. Nagarajaram, H.A., Reddy, B.V.B., and Blundell, T.L. 1999. Analysis and prediction of inter-strand packing distances between β-sheets of globular proteins. Protein Eng. 12: 1055-1062.
15. Ponder, J.W. and Richards, F.M. 1987. Internal packing and protein structural classes. In Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology, Vol. LII, pp. 421-428. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
16. Reddy, B.V.B. and Blundell, T.L. 1993. Packing of secondary structure elements in proteins: Analysis and prediction of inter-helix distances. J. Mol. Biol. 233: 464-479.
17. Reddy, B.V.B., Nagarajaram, H.A., and Blundell, T.L. 1999. Analysis of interactive packing of secondary structural elements in α/β units in proteins. Protein Sci. 8: 573-586.
18. Richmond, T.J. and Richards, F.M. 1978. Packing of α-helices: Geometrical constraints and contact areas. J. Mol. Biol. 119: 537-555.
19. Shoemaker, B.A., Portman, J.J., and Wolynes, P.G. 2000. Speeding molecular recognition by using the folding funnel: The fly-casting mechanism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 97: 8868-8873.
20. Tovchigrechko, A. and Vakser, I.A. 2001. How common is the funnel-like energy landscape in protein-protein interactions? Protein Sci. 10: 1572-1583.
21. Tsai, C.-J., Lin, S.L., Wolfson, H.J., and Nussinov, R. 1996. Protein-protein interfaces: Architectures and interactions in protein-protein interfaces and in protein cores: Their similarities and differences. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 31: 127-152.
22. Vajda, S., Sippl, M., and Novotny, J. 1997. Empirical potentials and functions for protein folding and binding. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 7: 222-228.
23. Vakser, I.A. 1995. Protein docking for low-resolution structures. Protein Eng. 8: 371-377.
24. -. 1997. Evaluation of GRAMM low-resolution docking methodology on the hemagglutinin-antibody complex. Proteins 1(Suppl): 226-230.
25. Vakser, I.A. and Aflalo, C. 1994. Hydrophobic docking: A proposed enhancement to molecular recognition techniques. Proteins 20: 320-329.
26. Vakser, I.A. and Jiang, S. 2002. Strategies for modeling the interactions of the transmembrane helices of G protein-coupled receptors by geometric complementarity using the GRAMM computer algorithm. Methods Enzymol. 343: 313-328.
27. Walther, D., Eisenhaber, F., and Argos, P. 1996. Principles of helix-helix packing in proteins: The helical lattice superposition model. J. Mol. Biol. 255: 536-553.
28. Yue, K. and Dill, K.A. 2000. Constraint-based assembly of tertiary protein structures from secondary structure elements. Protein Sci. 9: 1935-1946.