The use of an ultrasonic technique to remove a fractured rotary nickel-titanium instrument from the apical third of a curved root canal

Australian Endodontic Journal

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 25-30

  Ward, Jeff R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DENTAL ALLOY; NICKEL; TITANIUM; TITANIUM NICKELIDE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; ENDODONTICS; EQUIPMENT; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FOREIGN BODY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MICROSCOPY; PATHOLOGY; TOOTH PULP; TOOTH ROOT; ULTRASOUND;

ADULT; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL PULP CAVITY; EQUIPMENT FAILURE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; FOREIGN BODIES; HUMANS; MICROSCOPY; NICKEL; ROOT CANAL PREPARATION; TITANIUM; TOOTH APEX; ULTRASONICS;

EID: 0042806128     PISSN: 13291947     EISSN: 17474477     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-4477.2003.tb00492.x     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Walia H. Brantley WA. Gerstein H. An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of nitinol root canal files. JEndod 1988; 14:346-51.
2. Glosson C.R., Holler R.H., Dove S.B., del Rio C.E. A comparison of root canal preparations using NiTi hand, NiTi engine-driven. and K-flex endodontic instruments. JEndod 1995: 21: 146-51
3. Gombill J.M, Alder M., del Rio C.E. Comparison of nickel-titanium and stainless steel hand-file instrumentation using computed tomography. J Endod 1996: 22: 369-75.
4. Thompson S.A. Dummer P.M.H. Shaping ability of ProFile 0.04 taper Series 29 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Part I. Int Endod j I997a; 30: I 8.
5. Pruett 1.P. Clement D.J., Cornes D.L. Cyclic fatigue of nickel-titanium endodontic systems. J Endod 1997; 23: 77-85.
6. Gambarini G. Cyclic fatigue of ProFile rotary instruments after prolonged clinical use. Int Endod J 200I: 34: 386--9.
7. Zuolo M.L. Walton R.E. Instrument deterioration with usage: Nickel-titanium versus stainless steel. Quintessence Int 1997; 28: 397-402.
8. Barbakow F, Lutz F. The Lightspeed preparation technique evaluated by Swiss clinicans after attending continuing education courses. Int Endod J 1 997; 30: 46-50.
9. Mandel E., Adib-Yazdi M., Benhamou L.M., Lachthkar, Mesgouez C., Sobel M. Rotary NiTi profile systems for preparing curved canals in resin blocks: influence of operator on instrument breakage. Int Endod J 1999: 32: 436-43.
10. Ruddle CJ. Micr-o-endodontic nonsurgical retreatment. Dent Clin N Am 1997: 4 I: 429-54.
11. Ruddle C.J, Nonsurgical retreatment. In Cohen S. Burns R.C. eds. Pathways of the pulp, 8th edition. St Louis, 2002, Mosby Year Book Inc.
12. Thompson S.A., Dummer PM.H. Shaping ability of ProFile 0.04 taper Series 29 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Part 2. Int Endod J 1 997b: 30: 8 1 6.
13. Bryant S.T. Thompson S.A., Al-Omori M.A.O., Dummer P.M.H. Shaping ability of ProFile rotary nickel-titanium instruments with IS0 sized tips in simulated root canals. Part I. Int Endod J 1998; 3I: 275-8I
14. Haikel Y. Serfaty R. Bateman G. Senger B, Allernonn C. Dynamic and cyclic fatigue of engine-driven rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod 1999; 25: 434-40.
15. Sattapan B, Nervo G.J. Palamara J.E.A., Messer H.H. Defects in rotary nickel-iitanium files after clinical use. J Endod 2000: 26: 161--5.
16. Yared G.M. Bou Dagher FE. Machtou P Influence of rotational speed, torque, and operator's proficiency on ProFile failures. Int Endod J 200I: 34. 47--53.
17. Yared G.M., Bou Dogher FE., Machtou P, Kulkarni G.K. Influence of rotational speed, torque, and operator proficiency of Greater Taper files. Int Endod J 2002; 35: 7-1 2.
18. Esposito PT. Cunningham C.J. A comparison of canal preparation with nickel-titanium and steel instruments. J Endod 1995: 2I: 173-6.
19. Yared G.M., Bou Dagher FE. Machtou P. Cyclic fatigue of ProFile rotary instruments after simulated clinical use. Int Endod J 1999: 32: I 15-9.
20. Thompson S.A, Dummer P.M.H. Shaping ability of Quantec Ser-ies 2000 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Part 2. Int Endod J 1998: 3 I: 268-74.
21. Hülsmann M. Schinkel L. Influence of several factors on the success or failure of removal of fractured instruments from the root canal. Endod Dent Traumatol 1999; 15: 252-8.
22. Kerekes K., Tronstad L. Long-term results of endodontic treatment performed with a standardised technique. J Endod 1979: 5:83-90.
23. Grossrman L.I. Guidelines for the prevention of fracture of root canal instruments. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1969; 19: 305-8.
24. Strindberg L.Z. The dependence of the results of pulp therapy on certain factors. ACTA Odontol Scand 1956: I4 (Suppl 2I): 1-156.
25. Engström B. Lundberg M. The correlation between positive culture and the prognosis of root canal therapy after pulpectomy. Odontol Revy 1965; 16: 193-203.
26. Sjögren U., Hägglund B. Sundqvist G., Wing K. Factors affecting the long-term results of endodontic treatment. J Endod 1990; 16: 498-504.
27. Ingle J. l. Endodontics, 3rd edition. Philadelphia, 1985, Lea and Febiger.
28. Seltzer S. Endodontology. 2nd edition, Philadelphia, 1988, Lea and Febiger.
29. Crump M.C., Natkin E. Relationship of broken root canal instruments to endodontic case prognosis: a clinical investi gation. J Am Dent Assoc 1970; 80: I341-7.
30. Grossman L.I. Fate of endodontically treated teeth with fractured root canal instruments. J Brit Endod SOC 1968; 2: 35-7.
31. Kim S., Pecora G., Rubinstein R.A. Color atlas of microsurgery in endodontics. Philadelphia, 200I, W.B. Saunders Company, I5-8.
32. Fors U.G.H. Berg J.O. Endodontic treatment of root canals obstructed by foreign objects. Int Endod J 1986; 19: 2-10.
33. Walton R.E., Tarabinejad M. Principles and practice of endodontics, 3rd edition, Philadelphia, 2002, W.B. Saunders Company.
34. Seltzer S. Bender l. B., Smith J., Freedman I., Nozirnov H. Endo dontic failures: an analysis based on clinical, roentgenographic, and histologic findings - I and II. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1967;23:500-30.
35. Souyave L.CJ., lnglis A.T. Alcalay M. Removal of fractured endodontic instruments using ultrasonics. Br Dent J 1985; 159: 251-3.
36. Nagai O., Tani N., Kayaba Y, Kodama S., Osada T. Ultrasonic removal of broken instruments in root canals. Int Endod J 1986: 19:298-304.
37. Hülsmann M. The removal of silver cones and fractured instruments using the canal finder system. J Endod 1990; 16: 596-600.
38. Spriggs K. Gettlernan B. Messer H.H. Evaluation of a new method for silver point removal. J Endod 1990; 1 6: 335-8.
39. Hülsmann M. Methods for removing metal obstructions from the root canal. Endod Dent Traumatol 1993: 9: 223-37.
40. Nehme W. A new approach for the retrieval of broken instruments. J Endod 1999; 25: 633-5.