An approach to evaluating E-business information systems projects

Information Systems Frontiers

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 249-263

  Kleist, Virginia Franke ^a  

^a WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Evaluation criteria (EI02); Information technology adoption (EL05); Research frameworks (IB02); System evaluation (UF)

Indexed keywords

ASYNCHRONOUS TRANSFER MODE; COMPETITION; COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; ELECTRONIC COMMERCE; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; INVESTMENTS; MANAGERS; PRODUCTION ENGINEERING; WEBSITES; XML;

EVALUATION CRITERIA (E102); INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION (EL05); RESEARCH FRAMEWORKS (IB02); SYSTEM EVALUATION (UF);

MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 0042761763     PISSN: 13873326     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1025693109442     Document Type: Review

References (54)

1. Ackoff RL. Management misinformation systems. Management Science 1967;14(4):147-156.
2. Alpar P, Porembski M, Pickerodt S. Measuring efficiency of web site traffic generation. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 2001;6(1):53-74.
3. Bailey JE, Pearson SW. Development of a tool for measuring and analyzing computer user satisfaction. Management Science 1983;29(5):350-545.
4. Bariff M, Lusk EN. Cognitive personality tests for the design of MIS. Management Science 1977;23(8):820-829.
5. Barua A, Kriebel CH, Mukhopadhyay T. Information technologies and business value: An analytical emprical investigation. Information Systems Research 1995;6(1):3-23.
6. Benbasat I, Zmud RW. Empirical research in information systems: The practice of relevance. MIS Quarterly 1999;23(1):3-16.
7. Blair MM, Wallman SMH (eds.). Unseen Wealth: Report of the Brookings Task Force on Intangibles. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2001.
8. Brynjolfsson E. The productivity paradox of information technology. Communications of the ACM 1993;36(12):67-77.
9. Brooks FP Jr. The Mythical Man-Month. 2nd edition. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1995.
10. Brynjolfsson E, Smith MD. Frictionless commerce? A comparison of internet and conventional retailers. Management Science 2000;46:563-585.
11. Carmines EG, Zeller RA. Reliability and Validity Assessment. Newbury Park: Sage Publications, 1979.
12. Cash JI, Konsynski BR. IS Redraws competitive boundaries. Harvard Business Review, March-April 1985. Reprinted in Revolution in Real Time: Managing Information Technology in the 1990s. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Book, 1991:95-111.
13. Cronbach LJ, Meehl PE. Construct validity in psychological tests. In: Jackson DN, Messick S, eds. Problems in Human Assessment. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1959:57-77.
14. Cusumano MA, Yoffie DB. Competing on Internet Time: Lessons from Netscape and its Battle with Microsoft. New York: The Free Press, 1998.
15. Cyert RM, March JG. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm: Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1963.
16. Davenport T. Process Innovation: Reengineering Work Through information Technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1992.
17. Dearden J. MIS is a mirage. Harvard Business Review 1972;50(1):90-99.
18. DeLone WH, McLean ER. Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research 1992;3(1):60-95.
19. Doll W, Torkzadeh G. The measurement of end user computing satisfaction. MIS Quarterly 1988;(June):259-274.
20. Dos Santos B. Justifying investments in new information technologies. Journal of Management Information Systems 1994;7(4);71-90.
21. Dos Santos B, Peffers K, Mauer D. The impact of information technology investment announcements on the market value of the firm. Information Systems Research 1993;4(1):l-23.
22. Eilon S. Measuring quality of information systems. OMEGA 1993;21(2):135-138.
23. Floyd SW, Woolridge W. Path analysis of the relationship between competitive strategy, information technology, and financial performance. Journal of Management Information Systems 1990;7(1):47-64.
24. Grove HD, Frank HS, Hanbery G. The effect of information system intangibles on the market value of the firm. Journal of Information Systems 1990;Fall:36-47.
25. Grover V, Teng TC, Fiedler KD. Information technology enabled business process redesign: An integrated planning framework. OMEGA Int. J. of Management Science 1993;21(4):433-447.
26. Harris SE, Katz JL. Organizational performance and information technology investment intensity in the insurance industry. Organization Science 1991;2(3):263-295.
27. Hammer M. Reengineering work: Don't automate, obliterate. Harvard Business Review July/August, 1990.
28. Hammer M, Champy J. Reengineering the Corporation. New York: Harper and Row, 1992.
29. Hitt L, Brynjolfsson E. The three faces of IT value: Theory and evidence. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference of Information Systems, Vancouver, Dec. 1994:263-277.
30. Hong Se-Joon. Information processing costs in online stock trading. Electronic Markets 2000;10(3): 192-196.
31. Ives B, Olson M, Baroudi J. The measurement of user information satisfaction. Communications of the ACM 1983;26(10):785-793.
32. Keen Peter GW. Competing In Time: Using Telecommunications for Competitive Advantage. Ballinger Publishing Company, 1988.
33. Kemerer C. Information Technology and Industrial Competitiveness; How "IT" Shapes Competition. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998.
34. Klein S, O'Keefe B. Refining the measurement of e-commerce, International Journal of Electronic Commerce 2001;6(1):9.
35. Kuhn TS. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd edn. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, enlarged, 1970. Originally published in 1962.
36. Markus ML, Robey D. Information technology and organizational change-causal-structure in theory and research. Management Science 1988;34(5):583-598.
37. Lee C. Valuation of the internet infomediaries. Working Paper, June 2,1999, National Taiwan University.
38. Lester RK. The Productive Edge. New York: W.W. Norton and Co., 1998.
39. Lucas HC Jr. Information Technology and the Productivity Paradox. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.
40. Melone N. A theoretical assessment of the user-satisfaction construct in information systems research. Management Science 1990;36(1):76-91.
41. Perkins AB, Perkins MC. The Internet Bubble: Inside the Overvalued World of High-Tech Stocks. New York: HarperBusiness, 1999.
42. Porter M, Millar V. How information gives you competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review July/August, 1985.
43. Powell TC, DentMicallef A. Information technology as competitive advantage: The role of human, business and technology resources. Strategic Management Journal 1997;18(5):375-405.
44. Rangone A, Balocco R. A performance measurement system for planning and controlling a B2C e-commerce strategy. Electronic Markets 2000;10(2):130-143.
45. Reynolds PD. A Primer in Theory Construction. New York: MacMillan Publishing Co., 1971.
46. Sethi V, King WR. Construct measurement in information systems research. Decision Sciences 1991;22:455-472.
47. Shiller RJ. Irrational Exuberance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000.
48. Steinbart PJ, Nath R. Problems and issues in the management of international data communications networks: The experience of American companies. MIS Quarterly 1992;(March):55-73.
49. Stewart TA. Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organizations. New York: Doubleday, 1997.
50. Strassmann PA. The Business Value of Computers: An Executive's Guide. New Canaan. CT: The New Information Economics Press, 1990.
51. Tam KY. The impact of information technolgoy investments on firm performance and evaluation: Evidence from newly industrialized economies. Information Systems Research 1998;9(1):85-98.
52. Vehovar V, Manfreda KL, Batagelj Z. Sensitivity of e-commerce measurement to the survey instrument. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 2001;6(1):31-51.
53. Weill P. The relationship between investment in information technology and firm performance: A study of the valve manufacturing sector. Information Systems Kesearch 1992;3(4):307-333.
54. Weill P, Olson MH. Managing investment in information technology: Mini case examples and implications. MIS Quarterly 1989;(March):3-17.