A QSPR study of the p solute polarity parameter to estimate retention in HPLC

Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 1240-1247

  Bosque, Ramón ^a   Sales, Joaquim ^a   Bosch, Elisabeth ^a   Rosés, Marté ^a   Garcia Alvarez Coque M C ^b   Torres Lapasio J R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACIDITY; HYDROGEN BONDS; HYDROPHOBICITY; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

POLARITY;

ORGANIC COMPOUNDS;

EID: 0042700263     PISSN: 00952338     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci0340660     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Poole, C. F. The Essence of Chromatography; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2003.
2. Rosés, M.; Bosch, E. Linear solvation energy relationships in reversed-phase liquid chromatography. Prediction of retention from a single solvent and a single solute parameter. Anal. Chim. Acta 1993, 274, 247-162.
3. Bosch, E.; Bou, P.; Rosés, M. Linear description of solute retention in reversed-phase liquid chromatography by a new mobile phase polarity parameter. Anal. Chim. Acta 1994, 299, 219-229.
4. Rosés, M.; Bou, P.; Bosch, E.; Siigur, K. A new solvent parameter for prediction of retention on HPLC. Org. React. 1995, 29, 51-53.
5. Torres-Lapasió, J. R.; García-Alvarez-Coque, M. C.; Rosés, M.; Bosch, E. Prediction of the retention in reversed-phase liquid chromatography using solute-mobile phase-stationary phase polarity parameters. J. Chromatogr. A 2002, 955, 19-34.
6. Torres-Lapasió, J. R.; García-Alvarez-Coque, M. C.; Rosés, M.; Bosch, E.; Zissimos, A. M.; Abraham, M. H. Analysis of a solute polarity parameter in reversed-phase liquid chromatography on a linear solvation relationships basis. Submitted for publication.
7. Smith, R. M.; Burr, C. M. Retention prediction of analytes in reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography based in molecular structure: I Monosubstituted aromatic compounds. J. Chromatogr. 1989 475, 57-74.
8. Smith, R. M.; Burr, C. M. Retention prediction of analytes in reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography based in molecular structure: II Long-term reproducibility of capacity facors and retention. J. Chromatogr. 1989, 475, 75-83.
9. Smith, R. M.; Burr, C. M. Retention prediction of analytes in reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography based in molecular structure: III Monosubstituted aliphatic compounds. J. Chromatogr. 1989, 481, 71-84.
10. Smith, R. M.; Burr, C. M. Retention prediction of analytes in reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography based in molecular structure: IV Branched and unsaturated alkylbenzenes. J. Chromatogr. 1989, 481, 85-95.
11. Smith, R. M.; Burr, C. M. Retention prediction of analytes in reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography based in molecular structure: V Cripes Chromatographic retention index prediction expert system). J. Chromatogr. 1989, 485, 325-340.
12. Smith, R. M.; Burr, C. M. Retention prediction of analytes in reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography based in molecular structure: VI Disubstituted aromatic compounds. J. Chromatogr. 1991, 550, 335-356.
13. Katritzky, A. R.; Maran, U.; Lobanov, V. S.; Karelson, M. Structurally Diverse Quantitative Structure-Property Relationship Correlations of Technologically Relevant Physical Properties. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40, 1-18.
14. (a) Kaliszan, R. Quantitative Structure-Chromatographic Retention Relationships; Wiley: New York, 1987.
15. (b) Kaliszan, R. Structure and Retention in Chromatography. A Chemometric Approach; Harwood: Amsterdam, 1997.
16. (c) Forgács, E.; Cserháti, T. Molecular Basis of Chromatographic Separation; CRC: Boca Ratón, 1997.
17. Baczek, T.; Kaliszan, R. Predictive approaches to gradient retention based on analyte structural descriptors from calculation chemistry. J. Chromatogr. A 2003, 987, 29-37, and references therein.
18. Ledesma, E. B.; Wormat, M. J. QSRR Prediction of Chromatographic Retention of Ethynyl-Substituted PAH from semiempirically Computed Solute Descriptors. Anal. Chem. 2000, 72, 5437-5443.
19. Katritzky, A. R.; Perumal, S.; Petrukhin, R.; Kleimpeter, E. CODESSA-Based Theoretical QSPR Model for Hydantoin HPLC-RT Lipophilicities. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2001, 41, 569-574.
20. Hanai, T.; Hubert, J. Dependence of the retention of phenols upon van der Waals volume, π-energy and hydrogen bonding effects. J. Chromatogr. 1984, 302, 89-94.
21. Hanai, T.; Hubert, J. Retention versus wan der Waals volume and π energy in liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. 1984, 290, 197-206.
22. Hanai, T.; Hubert, J. Prediction of retention time of phenols in liquid chromatography. J. High Resolut. Chromatogr. Chromatogr. Commun. 1983, 6, 20-26.
23. Kaibara, A.; Hirose, M.; Nakagawa, T. Effect of the polar functional group of the solute on hydrophobic interaction with the stationary ligand in reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. Chromatographia 1990, 29, 551-556.
24. Katritzky, A. R.; Lovanov, V. S.; Karelson, M. CODESSA, Reference Manual V 2.13; Semichem and the University of Florida. 1997.
25. SPSS for Windows, version 10.0.06. SPSS Inc.
26. Dewar, M. J. S.; Zoebisch, E. G.; Healy, E. F.; Stewart, J. J. P. AMI: A New General Purpose Quantum Mechanical Molecular Model. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 707, 3902-3909.
27. Stewart, J. P. P. MOPAC 6.0, Quantum Chemistry Program Exchange; QCPE, No. 455, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN. 1989.
28. Basak, S. C.; Harris, D. K.; Magnuson, V. R. Comparative study of lipohilicity versus topological molecular descriptors in biological correlations. J. Pharm. Sci. 1984, 73, 429-437.
29. Kier, L. B.; Hall, L. H. The Nature of structure-activity relationships and their relation to molecular connectivity. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 1977, 12, 307-312.
30. Stanton, D. T.; Jurs, P. C. Development and Use of Charged Partial Surface Area Structural Descriptors in Computer-Assisted Quantitative Structure-Property Relationship Studies. Anal. Chem. 1990, 62, 2323-2329.
31. Stanton, D. T.; Egolf, L. M.; Jurs. P. C. Computer-Assisted Prediction of Normal Boiling Points of Pyrans and Pyrroles. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1992, 32, 306-316.
32. Zefirov, N. S.; Kirpichenok, M. A.; Izmailov, F. F.; Trofimov, M. I. Calculation schemes for atomic electronegativities in molecular graphs within the framework of Sanderson principle. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 1987, 296, 883-887.
33. Abraham, M. H.; Chadha, H. S.; Leo, A. J. Hydrogen bonding: XXXV. Relationships between high performance liquid chromatography factors, and water-octanol partition coefficients. J. Chromatogr. A 1994, 685, 203-211.
34. Hansch, C.; Leo, A.; Hoekman, D. Exploring QSAR, hydrophobic, electronic and steric constants; ACS Professional Reference Book, Washington, 1995.
35. Advanced Chemistry Development Inc. in SciFinder, Chemical Abstracts Service, http://www.cas.org/SCIFINDER.
36. Kier, L. B. In Computational Chemical Graph Theory; Rouvray, D. H., Ed.; Nova Science Publishers: New York, 1990.
37. Abraham, M. H. Scales of Solute Hydrogen-Bonding: Their Construction and Application to Physicochemical and Biochemical Processes. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1993, 73-83.
38. Abraham, M. H. In Quantitative Treatments of Solute/Solvent Interactions; Politzer, P., Murray, J. S., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1994.
39. Abraham, M. H.; Rosés, M. Hydrogen bonding. 38. Effect of solute structure and mobile phase composition on reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatographic capacity factors. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 1994, 7, 672-684.
40. 18 stationary phases. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 1997, 10, 358-368.