Developing primary care review criteria from evidence-based guidelines: Coronary heart disease as a model

British Journal of General Practice

Volumn 53, Issue 494, 2003, Pages 690-696

  Hutchinson, Allen ^a   McIntosh, Aileen ^a   Anderson, Jeff ^a   Gilbert, Claire ^a   Field, Rosemary ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Audit; Coronary heart disease (CHD); Evidence based practice; Guidelines; Primary care; Review criteria

Indexed keywords

ACETYLSALICYLIC ACID;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG DOSE REGIMEN; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; GENERAL PRACTICE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE; LOW DRUG DOSE; MEDICAL AUDIT; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; STABLE ANGINA PECTORIS; TREATMENT CONTRAINDICATION; UNITED KINGDOM;

CORONARY DISEASE; ENGLAND; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE;

EID: 0042697611     PISSN: 09601643     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Department of Health. The NHS Plan. London: 2000, The Stationery Office.
2. Department of Health. First-Class Service. Quality in the New NHS. London: NHS Executive, 1998.
3. NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Implementing Clinical Practice Guidelines: Can guidelines be used to improve clinical practice? Effective Health Care Bulletin 1994; 1(8): 1-8.
4. NICE. Welcome to nice. http://www.nice.org.uk/Cat.asp?pn=professional&cn=toplevel&ln=en (accessed 29 July 2003).
5. Curr SJ. Organisational interventions to encourage guideline implementation. Chest 2000; 118 (suppl. 2): 40S-46S.
6. Gourgoulianis KI, Hamos B, Christou K, Rizopoulou D, Efthimiou A. Prescription of medications by primary care physicians in the light of asthma guidelines. Respiration 1998; 65: 18-20.
7. Davis DA, Taylor-Vaisey A. Translating guidelines into practice: A systematic review of theoretic concepts, practical experience and research evidence in the adoption of clinical practice guidelines. Can Med Assoc J 1997; 157: 408-416.
8. Grol R, Jones R. Twenty years of implementation research. Fam Pract 2000; 17(suppl. 1): S26-S31.
9. Baker R, Fraser RC, Stone M, Stevenson K, Shiels C, Lambert P. Randomised controlled trial of the impact of guidelines, prioritised review criteria and feedback on the implementation of recommendations for angina and asthma. Br J Gen Pract 2003; 53: 284-291.
10. McColl A, Roderick P, Gabbay J, Smith H, Moore M. Performance indicators for primary care groups: An evidence-based approach. BMJ 1998; 317: 1345-1360.
11. Wilkinson EK, McColl A, Exworthy M, Roderick P, Smith H, Moore M, Gabbay J. Reactions to the use of evidence-based performance indicators in primary care: A qualitative study. Qual Health Care 2000; 9: 166-174.
12. Campbell SM, Roland MO, Shekelle PG, Cantrill J, Buetow SA, Cragg DK. Development of review criteria for assessing the quality of management of stable angina, adult asthma, and non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus in general practice. 1999; 8: 6-15.
13. Buetow SA, Coster GD. New Zealand and United Kingdom experiences with the RAND-modified Delphi approach to producing angina and heart failure criteria for quality assessment in general practice. Qual Health Care 2000; 9: 222-231.
14. Campbell SM, Mann M, Hacker J, Durie A, Thapar A, Roland MO. Quality assessment for three common conditions in primary care: Validity and reliability of review criteria developed by expert panels for angina, asthma and type 2 diabetes. Qual Saf Health Care 2002; 11: 125-130.
15. Campbell S, Braspenning J, Hutchinson A, Marshall M. Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care. Qual Saf Health Care 2002; 11: 358-364.
16. Hearnshaw HM, Harker RM, Cheater FM, Baker RH, Grimshaw GM. Expert consensus on the desirable characteristics of review criteria for improvement of health care quality. Qual Health Care 2001; 10: 173-178.
17. Grimshaw JM, Russell IT. Achieving health gain through clinical guidelines: II. Ensuring guidelines change clinical practice. Qual Health Care 1994; 3: 45-52.
18. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Using Clinical Practice Guidelines to Evaluate Quality of Care. Volume 1: Issues. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, 1995. (AHCPR publication no. 95-0045).
19. Baker R, Fraser R. Development of review criteria: Linking guidelines and assessment of quality. BMJ 1995; 311: 370-373.
20. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Using Clinical Practice Guidelines to Evaluate Quality of Care. Volume 2: Methods. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, 1995. (AHCPR publication no. 95-0045.)
21. Davies HTO. Performance management using health outcomes: In search of instrumentality. J Eval Clin Pract 1998; 4: 359-362.
22. Hadorn DC, Baker DW, Kamberg CJ, Brook RH. Practice guidelines. Phase II of the AHCPR-sponsored heart failure guideline: Translating practice recommendations into review criteria. Journal of Quality Improvement 1996; 22: 265-276.
23. Haycox A, Bagust A, Walley T. Clinical guidelines - The hidden costs. BMJ 1999; 318: 391-393.
24. Woolf SH, Grol R, Hutchinson A, Eccles M, Grimshaw J. Potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines. BMJ 1999; 318: 527-530.
25. Bell D, Layton AJ, Gabbay J. Use of a guideline-based questionnaire to audit hospital care of acute asthma. BMJ 1991; 302: 1440-1443.
26. Bradley EH, Horwitz SM, Grogan CM, Roberto M. Monitoring clinical quality in medicaid managed care. Conn Med 1998; 62(4): 215-220.
27. Cluzeau F, Littlejohns P, Grimshaw J, Feder G. Appraisal Instrument for Clinical Guidelines. London: St George's Hospital Medical School, 1997.
28. NHS. National Service Framework for Coronary Heart Disease. London: Department of Health, 2000.
29. North of England Guidelines Development Group. Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline: ACE-Inhibitors in the Primary Care Management of Adults with Symptomatic Heart Failure. Report 90. Newcastle-upon-Type: Centre for Health Services Research, 1997.
30. North of England Guidelines Development Group. Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline: The Primary Care Management of Stable Angina. Report 98. Newcastle-upon-Type: Centre for Health Services Research, 1999.
31. Khunti K, Baker R, Lakhani M. Management of Angina in General Practice. Audit protocol CT7. Leicester: Eli Lilly National Clinical Audit Centre, Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Leicester, 1995.
32. Hicks NR, Moher M. Evidence-Based Management: Common Cardiovascular Conditions. Oxford: Oxford University/Oxford Radcliffe NHS Trust, 1998.
33. Konstam MA, Dracup K, Baker DW, et al. Heart Failure: Evaluation and Care of Patients with Left-Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction. Report number 11. Rockville, MD: Department of Health and Human Services, AHCPR, 1994.
34. Khunti K, Baker R, Lakhani M. Heart Failure. Audit protocol CT13. Leicester: Eli Lilly National Clinical Audit Centre, Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Leicester, 1997.
35. NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Aspiring and myocardial infarction. Effectiveness Matters 1995; 1: 1-4.
36. National Prescribing Centre. Secondary prevention of myocardial infarction. MeReC Bulletin 1999; 10(2): 5-8.
37. Ryan TJ, Anderson JL, Antman EM, et al. Guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction. Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction). J Am Col Cardiol 1996; 28: 1328-1428.
38. The North of England study of standards and performance in general practice. Medical audit in general practice II: Effects on health of patients with common childhood conditions. BMJ 1992; 304: 1484-1488.