How do roll compaction/dry granulation affect the tableting behaviour of inorganic materials? Comparison of four magnesium carbonates

European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 281-289

  Freitag, Franziska ^a   Kleinebudde, Peter ^a,b  

^a MARTIN LUTHER UNIVERSITY HALLE WITTENBERG   (Germany)

^b HEINRICH HEINE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Heckel plot; Inorganic material; Magnesium carbonate; Recompression; Relative density; Roll compaction dry granulation

Indexed keywords

COMPACTION; DENSIFICATION; DEPOSITION; GRANULATION; MAGNESIUM COMPOUNDS; PRESSURE EFFECTS; TENSILE STRENGTH;

COMPACTION FORCES;

DRUG PRODUCTS;

INORGANIC COMPOUND; MAGNESIUM CARBONATE;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENSITY; FLOW RATE; FORCE; POWDER; PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TABLET FORMULATION; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 0042669705     PISSN: 09280987     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0928-0987(03)00133-7     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Armstrong N.A., Abourida N.M.A.H., Krijgsman L. Multiple compression of powders in a tablet press. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 34:1982;9-13.
2. Beten D.B., Yüksel N., Baykara T. The changes in the mechanic properties of a direct tableting agent microcrystalline cellulose by precompression. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 20:(14):1994;2323-2331.
3. Bultmann J.M. Multiple compaction of microcrystalline cellulose in a roller compactor. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 54:2002;59-64.
4. European Pharmacopoeia. 4th Edition: 2001;Council of Europe, Strasbourg.
5. Fell J.T., Newton J.M. Determination of tablet strength by the diametral-compression test. J. Pharm. Sci. 59:1970;688-691.
6. Hersey J.A., Rees J.E. Deformation of particles during briqueting. Nature Phys. Sci. 230:(12):1971;96.
7. Khan K.A., Musikabhumma P. Effect of slugging pressure on the properties of granules and tablets prepared from potassium phenethicillin. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 33:1981;627-631.
8. Kochhar S.K., Rubinstein M.H., Barnes D. The effects of slugging and recompression on pharmaceutical excipients. Int. J. Pharm. 115:1995;35-43.
9. Kuentz M., Leuenberger H. Pressure susceptibility of polymer tablets as a critical property: A modified heckel equation. J. Pharm. Sci. 88:(2):1999;174-179.
10. Malkowska S., Khan K.A. Effect of recompression on the properties of tablets prepared by dry granulation. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 9:(3):1983;331-347.
11. Murakami H., Yoneyama T., Nakajima K., Kobayashi M. Correlation between loose density and compactibility of granules prepared by various granulation methods. Int. J. Pharm. 216:2001;159-164.
12. Parrott E.L. Densification of powders by concavo-convex roller compactor. J. Pharm. Sci. 70:(3):1981;288-291.
13. Riepma K.A., Vromans H., Zuurmann K., Lerk C.F. The effect of dry granulation on the consolidation and compaction of crystalline lactose. Int. J. Pharm. 97:1993;29-38.
14. Roberts R.J., Rowe R.C. Brittle fracture propensity measurements on 'tablet-sized' cylindrical compacts. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 38:1986;526-528.
15. Ruegger C., Celik M. The influence of varying precompaction and main compaction profile parameters on the mechanical strength of compacts. Pharm. Dev. Technol. 5:2000;495-505.
16. Selkirk, A.B., Ganderton, D., 1970. The influence of wet and dry granulation methods on the pore structure of lactose tablets. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. Suppl., 86S-94S.
17. Sonnergaard J.M. A critical evaluation of the heckel equation. Int. J. Pharm. 193:1999;63-71.
18. Sonnergaard J.M. Impact of particle density and initial volume on mathematical compression models. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 11:2000;307-315.
19. Vezin W.R., Pang H.M., Khan K.A., Malkowska S. The effect of precompression in a rotary machine on tablet strength. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 9:(8):1983;1465-1474.
20. Zuurmann K., Riepma K.A., Bolhuis G.K., Vromans H., Lerk C.F. The relationship between bulk density and compactibility of lactose granulations. Int. J. Pharm. 102:1994;1-9.