Latent Inhibition and Learned Irrelevance of Occasion Setting

Learning and Motivation

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 157-182

  Oberling, Philippe ^a   Gunther, Lisa M ^c   Miller, Ralph R ^b  

^a INSERM   (France)

^b BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042597639     PISSN: 00239690     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/lmot.1999.1029     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Aguado L., Symonds M., Hall G. Interval between preexposure and test determines the magnitude of latent inhibition: Implications for an interference account. Animal Learning and Behavior. 22:1994;188-194.
2. Baker A. G. Learned irrelevance and learned helplessness: Rats learn that stimuli, reinforcers, and responses are uncorrelated. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes. 2:1976;130-141.
3. Baker A. G., Mackintosh N. J. Excitatory and inhibitory conditioning following uncorrelated presentations of CS and UCS. Animal Learning and Behavior. 5:1977;315-319.
4. Bonardi C. Inhibitory discriminative control is specific to both the response and the reinforcer. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 41B:1989;225-242.
5. Bonardi C. Blocking of occasion setting in feature-positive discriminations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 43B:1991;431-448.
6. Bonardi C. Conditional learning: An associative analysis. Occasion setting: Associative learning and cognition in animals. 1998;Am. Psychol. Assoc. Washington. p. 37-67.
7. Bonardi C., Hall G. Learned irrelevance: No more than the sum of CS and US preexposure effects? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes. 22:1996;183-191.
8. Bouton M. E. Context and retrieval in extinction and in other examples of interference in simple associative learning. Dachowski L. W., Flaherty C. F. Current topics in animal learning: Brain, emotion and cognition. 1991;25-53 Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
9. Bouton M. E. Context, time, and memory retrieval in the interference paradigms of Pavlovian learning. Psychological Bulletin. 114:1993;80-99.
10. Brandon S. E., Wagner A. R. Modulation of a discrete Pavlovian conditioned reflex by a putative emotive Pavlovian conditioned stimulus. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes. 17:1991;299-311.
11. Davidson T. L., Rescorla R. A. Transfer of facilitation in the rat. Animal Learning and Behavior. 14:1986;380-386.
12. Davidson T. L., Aparicio J., Rescorla R. A. Transfer between Pavlovian facilitators and instrumental discriminative stimuli. Animal Learning and Behavior. 16:1988;285-291.
13. Friedman B., Blaisdell A. P., Miller R. R. Comparator mechanisms and conditioned inhibition: CS preexposure disrupts Pavlovian conditioned inhibition but not explicitly unpaired inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes. 24:1998;453-466.
14. Grahame N. J., Barnet R. C., Gunther L. M., Miller R. R. Latent inhibition as a performance deficit resulting from CS-context associations. Animal Learning and Behavior. 22:1994;395-408.
15. Gunther L. M., Cole R. P., Miller R. R. Overshadowing of occasion setting. Learning and Motivation. 29:1998;323-344.
16. Holland P. C. Occasion-setting in Pavlovian feature positive discriminations. Commons M. L., Herrnstein R. J., Wagner A. R. Quantitative analysis of behavior: Discrimination processes. 1983;183-206 Ballinger, New York.
17. Holland P. C. Temporal determinants of occasion setting in feature-positive discrimination. Animal Learning and Behavior. 14:1986a;111-120.
18. Holland P. C. Transfer after serial feature positive discrimination training. Learning and Motivation. 17:1986b;243-268.
19. Holland P. C. Feature extinction enhances transfer of occasion setting. Animal Learning and Behavior. 17:1989;269-279.
20. Holland P. C. Transfer of control in ambiguous discriminations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes. 17:1991;231-248.
21. Jenkins H. M., Sainsbury R. S. The development of stimulus control through differential reinforcement. Mackintosh N. J., Honig W. K. Fundamental issues in associative learning. 1969;123-161 Dalhousie Univ. Press, Halifax.
22. Kasprow W. J., Catterson D., Schachtman T. R., Miller R. R. Attenuation of latent inhibition by postacquisition reminder. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 36B:1984;53-63.
23. Kraemer P. J., Spear N. E. The effect of nonreinforced stimulus exposure on the strength of a conditioned taste aversion as a function of retention interval: Do latent inhibition and extinction involve a shared process? Animal Learning and Behavior. 20:1992;1-7.
24. Lubow R. E. Latent inhibition and conditioned attention theory. 1989;Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
25. Lubow R. E., Gewirtz J. C. Latent inhibition in humans: Data, theory, and implications for schizophrenia. Psychological Bulletin. 117:1995;87-103.
26. Lubow R. E., Moore A. U. Latent inhibition: The effect of non-reinforced preexposure to the conditional stimulus. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology. 52:1959;415-419.
27. Lubow R. E., Weiner I., Schnur P. Conditioned attention theory. Bower G. H. The psychology of learning and motivation. 1981;1-49 Academic Press, New York.
28. Mackintosh N. J. Stimulus selection: learning to ignore stimuli that predict no change in reinforcement. Hinde R. A., Stevenson-Hinde J. Constraints on learning. 1973;75-96 Academic Press, London.
29. Mackintosh N. J. The psychology of animal learning. 1974;Academic Press, London.
30. Mackintosh N. J. A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement. Psychological Review. 82:1975;276-298.
31. Matzel L. D., Schachtman T. R., Miller R. R. Learned irrelevance exceeds the sum of CS-preexposure and US-preexposure deficits. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes. 14:1988;311-319.
32. McLaren I. P. L., Kaye H., Mackintosh N. J. An associative theory of the representation of stimuli: Applications to perceptual learning and latent inhibition. Morris R. G. M. Parallel distributed processing: Implications for psychology and neurobiology. 1989;102-120 Clarendon, Oxford.
33. Miller R. R., Matzel L. D. The comparator hypothesis: A response rule for the expression of associations. Bower G. H. The psychology of learning and motivation. 1988;51-92 Academic Press, Orlando.
34. Miller R. R., Oberling P. Analogies between occasion setting and Pavlovian conditioning. Schmajuk N. A., Holland P. C. Occasion setting: Associative learning and cognition in animals. 1998;3-35 Am. Psychol. Assoc. Washington.
35. Miller R. R., Schachtman T. R. Conditioning context as an associative baseline: Implications for response generation and the nature of conditioned inhibition. Miller R. R., Spear N. E. Information processing in animals: Conditioned Inhibition. 1985;51-88 Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
36. Pearce J. M. A model for stimulus generalization in Pavlovian conditioning. Psychological Review. 94:1987;61-73.
37. Pearce J. M., Hall G. A model for Pavlovian learning: Variation in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli. Psychological Review. 87:1980;532-552.
38. Rescorla R. A. Summation and retardation tests of latent inhibition. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology. 75:1971;77-81.
39. Rescorla R. A. Conditioned inhibition and facilitation. Miller R. R., Spear N. E. Information processing in animals: Conditioned inhibition. 1985;299-326 Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
40. Rescorla R. A. Facilitation and excitation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes. 12:1986;325-332.
41. Rescorla R. A. Facilitation based on inhibition. Animal Learning and Behavior. 16:1988;169-176.
42. Ross R. T. Relationships between the determinants of performance in serial feature-positive discriminations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes. 9:1983;349-373.
43. Ross R. T., Holland P. C. Conditioning of simultaneous and serial feature-positive discriminations. Animal Learning and Behavior. 9:1981;293-303.
44. Schmajuk N., Lamoureux J. A., Holland P. C. Occasion setting: A neural network approach. Psychological Review. 105:1998;3-32.
45. Schmajuk N. A., Holland P. C. Occasion setting: Associative learning and cognition in animals. 1998;Am. Psychol. Assoc. Washington.
46. Swartzentruber D. Blocking between occasion setters and contextual stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes. 13:1991;3-13.
47. Thomas D. R., Curran P. S., Russel R. J. Factors affecting conditional discrimination learning in pigeons: II. Physical and temporal characteristics of stimuli. Animal Learning and Behavior. 16:1988;468-476.
48. Wagner A. R. Priming in STM: an information processing mechanism for self-generated or retrieval-generated depression in performance. Tighe T. J., Leaton R. N. Habituation: Perspectives from child development, animal behavior, and neurophysiology. 1976;95-128 Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
49. Wagner A. R. Expectancies and the priming of STM. Hulse S. H., Fowler H., Honig W. K. Cognitive processes in animal behavior. 1978;177-209 Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
50. Wagner A. R. SOP: A model of automatic memory processing in animal behavior. Miller R. R., Spear N. E. Information processing in animals: Memory mechanisms. 1981;5-47 Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
51. Wagner A. R., Brandon S. E. Evolution of a structured connectionist model of Pavlovian conditioning (AESOP). Klein S. B., Mowrer R. R. Contemporary learning theories: Pavlovian conditioning and the status of traditional learning theory. 1989;149-190 Erlbaum, Hillsdale.