Heterosexual signalling by the lizard Anolis carolinensis, with intersexual comparisons across contexts

Behaviour

Volumn 140, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 603-634

  Orrell, Kimberly S ^a   Jenssen, Thomas A ^a  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042570577     PISSN: 00057959     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/156853903322149469     Document Type: Article

References (104)

1. Andersson, M. (1994). Sexual selection. - Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
2. Andrews, R.M. (1985a). Oviposition frequency of Anolis carolinensis. - Copeia 1985, p. 259-262.
3. _ (1985b). Mate choice by females of the lizard, Anolis carolinensis. - J. Herpetol. 19, p. 284-289.
4. Barlow, G. (1977). Modal action patterns. - In: How animals communicate (T.A. Sebeok, ed.). Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Indiana, p. 98-134.
5. Bateman, A.J. (1948). Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. - Heredity 2, p. 349-368.
6. Bels, V.L. (1990). The mechanism of dewlap extension in Anolis carolinensis (Reptilia: Iguanidae) with histological analysis of the hyoid apparatus. - J. Morphol. 206, p. 225-244.
7. Berglund, A., Bisazza, A. & Pilastro, A. (1996). Armaments and ornaments: an evolutionary explanation of traits of dual utility. - Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 58, p. 385-399.
8. Birkhead, T.R. (1998). Cryptic female choice: criteria for establishing female sperm choice. - Evolution 52, p. 1212-1218.
9. Bradbury, J.W. & Vehrencamp, S.L. (1998). Principles of animal communication. - Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
10. Buth, D.G., Gorman, G.C. & Lieb, C.S. (1980). Genetic divergence between Anolis carolinensis and its Cuban progenitor, Anolis porcatus. - J. Herpetol. 14, p. 279-284.
11. Carpenter, C.C. (1982). The aggressive displays of Iguanine lizards. - In: Iguanas of the world, their behavior, ecology and conservation (G.M. Burghardt & A.S. Rand, eds). Noyes Publications, Park Ridge, New Jersey, p. 215-231.
12. _ (1986). An inventory of the Display-Action-Patterns in lizards. - Smiths. Herpetol. Inf. Serv. 68, p. 1-19.
13. _ & Grubitz, G. (1961). Time-motion study of a lizard. - Ecology 42, p. 123-128.
14. Cooper, W.E., Jr. (1977). Information analysis of agonistic behavioral sequences in male Iguanid lizards, Anolis carolinensis. - Copeia 1977, p. 721-735.
15. _ (1979). Variability and predictability of courtship in Anolis carolinensis (Reptilia, Lacertilia, Iguanidae). - J. Herpetol. 13, p. 233-243.
16. _ (1985). Female residency and courtship intensity in a territorial lizard, Holbrookia propinqua. - Amphibia-Reptilia 6, p. 63-69.
17. Crews, D. (1973a). Coition-induced inhibition of sexual receptivity in female lizards (Anolis carolinensis). - Physiol. Behav. 11, p. 463-468.
18. _ (1973b). Social factors associated with the male in the control of reproduction in the female lizard Anolis carolinensis: the role of courtship and aggression. - PhD thesis. Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
19. _ (1975). Inter- and Intraindividual variation in display patterns in the lizard Anolis carolinensis (Reptilia, Lacertilia, Iguanidae). - J. Herpetol. 13, p. 233-243.
20. Davies, N.B. (1991). Mating systems. - In: Behavioural ecology: An evolutionary approach, 3rd ed. (J.R. Krebs & N.B. Davies, eds). Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, United Kingdom, p. 263-294.
21. DeCourcy, K.R. & Jenssen, T.A. (1994). Structure and use of male territorial headbob signals by the lizard Anolis carolinensis. - Anim. Behav. 47, p. 251-262.
22. Emlen, S. & Oring, L. (1977). Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. - Science 197, p. 215-223.
23. Evans, L.T. (1938). Courtship behavior and sexual selection of Anolis. - J. Comp. Psychol. 26, p. 475-491.
24. Font, E. & Rome, L. (1990). Functional morphology of dewlap extension in the lizard Anolis equestris (Iguanidae). - J. Morphol. 206, p. 245-258.
25. Ford, N.B. (1986). The role of pheromone trails in the sociobiology of snakes. - In: Chemical signals in vertebrates (D. Duvall, D. Müller-Schwarze & R.M. Silverstein, eds). Plenum, New York, p. 261-278.
26. Forsythe, A. & Alcock, J. (1990). Female mimicry and resource defense polygyny by males of a tropical rove beetle, Leistrotrophus versicolor (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae). - Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 26, p. 325-330.
27. Fox, W. (1963). Special tubules for sperm storage in female lizards. - Nature 198, p. 500-501.
28. Fox, S.F. & Baird, T.A. (1992). The dear enemy phenomenon in the collared lizard, Crotaphytus collaris, with a cautionary note on experimental methodology. - Anim. Behav. 44, p. 780-782.
29. Goncalves, E.J., Almada, V.C., Oliveira, R.F. & Santos, A.J. (1996). Female mimicry as a mating tactic in males of the blenniid fish Salaria pavo. - J. Marine Biol. Assoc. U.K. 76, p. 529-538.
30. Greenberg, B. & Noble, G.K. (1944). Social behavior of the American chameleon (Anolis carolinensis Voigt). - Physiol. Zool. 17, p. 392-439.
31. Greenberg, N. (1977). A neuroethological study of display behavior in the lizard Anolis carolinensis (Reptilia, Lacertilia, Iguanidae). - Amer. Zool. 17, p. 392-439.
32. _ & Crews, D. (1983). Physiological ethology of aggression in amphibians and reptiles. - In: Hormones and aggressive behavior (B.B. Svare, ed.). Plenum Press, New York, p. 469-506.
33. Hakkarainen, H., Korpimaki, H.E. & Palokangas, P. (1993). Delayed maturation in plumage color - evidence for the female-mimicry hypothesis in the kestrel. - Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 33, p. 247-251.
34. Harari, A.R., Brockmann, H.J. & Landolt, P.J. (2000). Intrasexual mounting in the beetle Diaprepes abbreviatus (L.). - Proc. Royal Soc. London B 267, p. 2071-2079.
35. Howard, R.D. (1978). The evolution of mating strategies in bullfrogs, Rana catesbeiana. - Evolution 32, p. 850-871.
36. _, Moorman, R.S. & Whiteman, H.H. (1997). Differential effects of mate competition and mate choice on eastern tiger salamanders. - Anim. Behav. 53, p. 1345-1356.
37. Husak, J.F. & Fox, S.F. (2003). Adult male collared lizards, Crotaphytus collaris, increase aggression towards displaced neighbours. Anim. Behav. 65, p. 391-396.
38. Jennions, M.D. & Petrie, M. (2000). Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. - Biol. Rev. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 75, p. 21-64.
39. Jenssen, T.A. (1970). Female response to filmed displays of Anolis nebulosus (Sauria, Iguanidae). - Anim. Behav. 18, p. 640-647.
40. _ (1971). Display analysis of Anolis nebulosus. (Sauria, Iguanidae). - Copeia 1971, p. 197-209.
41. _ (1977). Evolution of anoline lizard display behavior. - Amer. Zool. 17, p. 203-215.
42. _ (1978). Display diversity in Anoline lizards and problems of interpretation. - In: Behavior and neurology of lizards (N. Greenberg & P.D. MacLean, eds). National Institute of Mental Health, Rockville, Maryland, p. 269-285.
43. _ (1979). Display modifiers of Anolis opalinus (Lacertilia: Iguanidae). - Herpetologica 35, p. 21-30.
44. _ (1996). A test of assortative mating between sibling lizard species, Anolis websteri and A. caudalis, in Haiti. - In: Herpetology of the West Indies: a symposium in honor of Albert Schwartz (R. Powell & R. Henderson, eds). SSAR Contributions to Herpetology Series, Ithaca, New York, p. 303-315.
45. _, Lovern, M.B. & Congdon, J.D. (2001). Field-testing the protandry-based mating system for the lizard, Anolis carolinensis: does the model organism have the right model? - Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 50, p. 162-172.
46. _, Greenberg, N. & Hovde, K.A. (1995). Behavioral profile of free-ranging male lizards, Anolis carolinensis, across breeding and post-breeding seasons. - Herpetol. Monogr. 9, p. 41-62.
47. _ & Nunez, S.C. (1998). Spatial and breeding relationships of the lizard, Anolis carolinensis: evidence of intrasexual selection. - Behaviour 135, p. 981-1003.
48. _, Orrell, K.S. & Lovern, M.B. (2000). Sexual dimorphisms in aggressive signal structure and use by a polygynous lizard, Anolis carolinensis. - Copeia 2000, p. 140-149.
49. _ & Rothblum, L.M. (1977). Display repertoire analysis of Anolis townsendi (Sauria: Iguanidae) from Cocos Island. - Copeia 1977, p. 103-109.
50. Langmore, N.E. & Bennett, A.T.D. (1999). Strategic concealment of sexual identity in an estrildid finch. - Proc. Royal Soc. London B 266, p. 543-550.
51. Licht, P. (1971). Regulation of the annual testis cycle by photoperiod and temperature in the lizard Anolis carolinensis. - Ecology 52, p. 540-252.
52. Lightbody, K.P. & Weatherhead, P.J. (1988). Female settling patterns and polygyny: tests of a neutral-mate-choice hypothesis. - Amer. Nat. 132, p. 20-33.
53. Lopez, P. & Martin, J. (2001). Fighting rules and rival recognition reduce costs of aggression in male lizards, Podarcis hispanica. - Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 49, p. 111-116.
54. Losos, J.B. (1985). An experimental demonstration of the species-recognition role of Anolis dewlap color. - Copeia 1985, p. 905-910.
55. Lovern, M.B. (2000). Social and hormonal effects on the ontogeny of sex differences in behavior in the lizard, Anolis carolinensis. - PhD thesis. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia.
56. _, Jenssen, T.A., Orrell, K.S. & Tuchak, T. (1999). Comparisons of temporal display structure acoss contexts and populations in male Anolis carolinensis: signal stability or lability? - Herpetologica 55, p. 222-234.
57. MacDonald, D. & Echternacht, A.C. (1991). Red-throated and gray-throated Anolis carolinensis: do females know the difference? - Anolis Newsletter 4, p. 92-100.
58. Macedonia, J.M., Evans, C.S. & Losos, J.B. (1994). Male Anolis lizards discriminate video-recorded conspecific and heterospecific displays. - Anim. Behav. 47, p. 1220-1223.
59. _ & Stamps, J.A. (1994). Species recognition in Anolis grahami: evidence from responses to video playbacks of conspecific and heterospecific displays. - Ethology 98, p. 246-264.
60. McGeveran, Jr., W. (2002). The world almanac and book of facts. World Almanac Education Group, Inc. New York, p. 1-1008.
61. Martins, E.P. (1991). Individual and sex differences in the use of push-up display by the sagebrush lizard, Sceloporus graciosus. - Anim. Behav. 41, p. 403-416.
62. Mason, R.T. & Crews, D. (1985). Female mimicry in garter snakes. - Nature 316, p. 59-60.
63. Michaud, E.J. (1990). Geographic variation of life history traits in the lizard, Anolis carolinensis. - PhD dissertation, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee.
64. Noble, G.K. & Bradley, H.T. (1933). The mating behavior of lizards: its bearing on the theory of sexual selection. - Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 35, p. 25-100.
65. Nunez, S.C., Jenssen, T.A. & Ersland, K. (1997). Female activity profile of a polygynous lizard (Anolis carolinensis): evidence of intersexual asymmetry. - Behaviour 134, p. 205-223.
66. Oliveira, R.F. & Almada, V.C. (1998). Mating tactics and male-male courtship in the lek-breeding cichlid Oreochromis mossambicus. - J. Fish Biol. 52, p. 1115-1129.
67. Olsson, M. (1994). Rival recognition affects male contest behavior in sand lizards (Lacerta agilis). - Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 35, p. 249-252.
68. Ord, T.J., Blumstein, D.T. & Evans, C.S. (2001). Intrasexual selection predicts the evolution of signal complexity in lizards. - Proc. Royal Soc. London B 268, p. 737-744.
69. Orrell, K.S. (2002). Male mate preference, heterosexual communication, and reproductive energetics of the polygynous lizard, Anolis carolinensis. - PhD dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia.
70. _ & Jenssen, T.A. (1998). Display behavior of Anolis bahorucoensis: an anole with a diminutive dewlap. - Caribbean J. Sci. 34, p. 113-125.
71. _ & _ (in press). Male mate choice by the lizard, Anolis carolinensis: a preference for novel females. - Anim. Behav.
72. Ortiz, P.R. & Jenssen, T.A. (1982). Interspecific aggression between lizard competitors, Anolis cooki and Anolis cristatellus. - Z. Tierpsychol. 60, p. 227-238.
73. Partridge, L. & Endler, J.A. (1987). Life history constraints on sexual selection. - In: Sexual selection: testing the alternatives (J.W. Bradbury & M.B. Andersson, eds). Wiley, Chichester, United Kingdom, p. 265-277.
74. Passek, K. (2002). Extra-male paternity and sperm competition in the lizard Anolis carolinensis. - PhD dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia.
75. Qualls, C.P. & Jaeger, R.G. (1991). Dear enemy recognition in Anolis carolinensis. - J. Herpetol. 25, p. 361-363.
76. Rand, A.S. & Williams, E.E. (1970). An estimation of redundancy and information content of anole dewlaps. - Amer. Nat. 104, p. 9-103.
77. Rice, W.R. (1989). Analyzing tables of statistical tests. - Evolution 43, p. 223-225.
78. Ruby, D.E. (1977). The function of the shudder displays in the lizard Sceloporus jarrovi. - Copeia 1977, p. 110-114.
79. _ (1984). Male breeding success and differential access to females in Anolis carolinensis. - Herpetologica 40, p. 272-280.
80. Ruchon, F., Laugier, T. & Quignard, J.P. (1995). Alternative male reproductive strategies in the peacock blenny. - J. Fish Biol. 47, p. 826-840.
81. Ruibal, R. (1967). Evolution and behavior in West Indian anoles. - In: Lizard ecology: a symposium (W.W. Milstead, ed.). University of Missouri Press, Columbia, Missouri, p. 116-140.
82. SAS Institute Inc. (1989). SAS/STAT user's guide, version 6, 4th Ed., Vol. 1 & 2. - SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina.
83. Saetre, G.P. & Slagsvold, T. (1996). The significance of female mimicry in male contests. - Amer. Nat. 147, p. 981-995.
84. Searcy, W.A. & Andersson, M. (1986). Sexual selection and the evolution of song. - Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 17, p. 507-533.
85. _ & Yawasaka, K. (1994). Polygyny and sexual selection in red-winged blackbirds. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
86. Shine, R., Phillips, B., Waye, H., LeMaster, M. & Mason, R.T. (2001). Benefits of female mimicry in snakes. - Nature 414, p. 267.
87. Sigmund, W.R. (1978). The analysis of visual displays in the lizard, Anolis carolinensis. - PhD dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana.
88. Soltis, J. & McElreath, R. (2001). Can females gain extra paternal investment by mating with multiple males? A game theoretic approach. - Amer. Nat. 158, p. 519-529.
89. Stamps, J.A. & Barlow, G.W. (1973). Variation and stereotypy in the displays of Anolis aeneus (Sauria: Iguanidae). - Behaviour 47, p. 67-94.
90. Sutherland, W.J. (1996). From individual behaviour to population ecology. Oxford University Press, New York.
91. Thornhill, R. (1976). Sexual selection and nuptual feeding behavior in Bittacus apicalis (Insecta: Mecoptera). - Amer. Nat. 110, p. 529-548.
92. _ & Alcock, J. (1983). The evolution of insect mating systems. - Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massechusetts.
93. Tinbergen, N. (1951). The study of instinct. - Oxford University Press, New York.
94. Tinkle, D.W. (1967). The life and demography of the side-blotched lizard, Uta stansburiana. - Misc. Publ. Mus. Zool., University of Michigan 132, p. 1-182.
95. Tokarz, R.R. (1985). Body size as a factor determining dominance in staged agonistic encounters between male brown anoles (Anolis sagrei). - Anim. Behav. 33, p. 746-753.
96. _ (1992). Male mating preference for unfamiliar females in the lizard, Anolis sagrei. - Anim. Behav. 44, p. 843-849.
97. _ (1995). Mate choice in lizards: a review. - Herpetol. Monogr. 9, p. 17-40.
98. Tregenza, T. & Wedell, N. (2000). Genetic compatibility, mate choice and patterns of parentage: invited review. - Molecular Ecol. 9, p. 1013-1027.
99. Trivers, R. (1976). Sexual selection and resource-accruing abilities in Anolis garmani. - Evolution 30, p. 253-269.
100. Uglem, I., Galloway, T.F., Rosenqvist, G. & Folstad, I. (2001). Male dimorphism, sperm traits and immunology in the corkwing wrasse (Symphodus melops L.). - Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 50, p. 511-518.
101. Webster, T.P. & Burns, J.M. (1973). Dewlap color variation and electrophoretically detected sibling species in a Haitian lizard, Anolis brevirostris. - Evolution 27, p. 368-377.
102. Whiting, M.J. (1999). When to be neighbourly: differential agonistic responses in the lizard Platysaurus broadleyi. - Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 46, p. 210-124.
103. Wiley, R.H. & Poston, J. (1996). Indirect mate choice, competition mates, and coevolution of the sexes. - Evolution 50, p. 1371-1381.
104. Zeh, J.A. & Zeh, D.W. (1996). The evolution of polyandry I: intragenomic conflict and genetic incompatibility. - Proc. Royal Soc. London B 263, p. 1711-1717.