Patch-testing practices of American Contact Dermatitis Society members: A cross-sectional survey

American Journal of Contact Dermatitis

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 5-11

  Warshaw, Erin M ^a   Moore, Jane Blowers ^a   Nelson, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ALLERGY; ALLERGY TEST; ARTICLE; CHILD; CONTACT DERMATITIS; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATCH TEST; PHOTOPATCH TEST; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRIVATE PRACTICE; SKIN ALLERGY; THIN LAYER RAPID USE EPICUTANEOUS TEST;

EID: 0042562051     PISSN: 1046199X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2310/6620.2003.38741     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Fischer T, Maibach H, Howard I. Improved, but not perfect, patch testing. Am J Contact Dermat 1990;1(2):73-90.
2. Storrs FJ. Additional sources of information that can be used in patch testing. Am J Contact Dermat 1995;6(1):40-1.
3. Beltrani VS, Beltrani VP. Contact dermatitis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 1997;78:160-73.
4. Rietschel RL, Fowler JF. Fisher's contact dermatitis. 4th ed. Williams & Wilkins; 1995. p. 11.
5. Belsito DV. Message from the president. In: American Contact Dermatitis Society 2001 Membership Directory. p. 2-3.
6. Warshaw EM, Nelson D. Prevalence of evaluation for latex allergy and association with practice characteristics in United States dermatologists: results of a cross-sectional survey. Aro J Contact Dermat 2001;12(3):139-45.
7. Warshaw EM, Nelson D. Prevalence of patch testing and methodology of U.S. dermatologists: results of a cross-sectional survey. Am J Contact Dermat 2002;13(2):53-8.
8. Farrell A, Warshaw EM, Zhao Y, Nelson D. Prevalence and methodology of patch testing by allergists in the United States: results of a cross-sectional survey. Am J Contact Dermat 2002;13(4):157-63.
9. Farrell A, Warshaw EM, Zhao Y, Nelson D. Prevalence and methodology of evaluation for latex allergy among allergists in the United States: results of a cross-sectional survey. Am J Contact Dermat 2002;13(4):183-9.
10. Zug K. Time, costs and other factors affecting patch testing. Presented at the New Orleans American Academy of Dermatology meeting, Contact and Occupational Dermatitis Symposium; 1998; New Orleans (LA).
11. Rietschel RL, Adams RM, Maibach HI, et al. The case for patch test readings beyond day 2. J Am Acad Dermatol 1988;18:42-5.
12. Uter WJ, Geier J, Schnuch A. Good clinical practice in patch testing: readings beyond day 2 are necessary: a confirmatory analysis. Am J Contact Dermat 1996;7(4):231-7.