Exploring noiseless subsystems via nuclear magnetic resonance

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 67, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 623031-6230316

  Fortunato, Evan M ^a   Viola, Lorenza ^b   Pravia, Marco A ^a   Knill, Emanuel ^b   Laflamme, Raymond ^c,d   Havel, Timothy F ^a   Cory, David G ^a  

^a USA   (United States)

^b LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^d PERIMETER INSTITUTE FOR THEORETICAL PHYSICS   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); DYNAMICS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE;

NOISELESS SUBSYSTEMS;

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 0042510752     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. M.A. Nielsen and I.L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000).
2. L. Viola, E. Knill, and R. Laflamme, J. Phys. A 34, 7067 (2001).
3. P.W. Shor, in Proceedings of the 37th Symposium on the Foundations of Computer Science (IEEE Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 1996).
4. A.Yu. Kitaev, Russ. Math. Surveys 52, 1191 (1997).
5. D. Aharonov and M. Ben-Or, in Proceedings of the 29th Annual ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computation (ACM Press, New York, 1996).
6. E. Knill, R. Laflamme, and W.H. Zurek, Science (Washington, DC, U.S.) 279, 342 (1998).
7. J. Preskill, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 454, 385 (1998).
8. P. Zanardi and M. Rasetti, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 3306 (1997).
9. L.-M. Duan and G.-C. Guo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1953 (1997).
10. D.A. Lidar, I.L. Chuang, and K.B. Whaley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 2594 (1998).
11. E. Knill, R. Laflamme, and L. Viola, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2525 (2000).
12. L. Viola, E. Knill, and S. Lloyd, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3520 (2000).
13. S. De Filippo, Phys. Rev. A 62, 052307 (2000).
14. P. Zanardi, Phys. Rev. A 63, 012301 (2001).
15. L. Viola, E. Knill, and S. Lloyd, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2417 (1999).
16. P. Zanardi, Phys. Lett. A 258, 77 (1999).
17. L. Viola, S. Lloyd, and E. Knill, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4888 (1999).
18. D. Vitali and P. Tombesi, Phys. Rev. A 59, 4178 (1999).
19. L. Viola, Phys. Rev. A 66, 012307 (2002).
20. L. Viola and E. Knill, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 037901 (2003).
21. R. Freeman, S.P. Kempsell, and M.H. Levitt, J. Magn. Reson. (1969-1992) 38, 453 (1980).
22. A.J. Shaka and R. Freeman, J. Magn. Reson. (1969-1992) 55, 487 (1983).
23. H.K. Cummins and J.A. Jones, New J. Phys. 2, 6.1 (2000).
24. E.M. Fortunato, M.A. Pravia, N. Boulant, G. Teklemariam, T.F. Havel, and D.G. Cory, J. Chem. Phys. 116, 7599 (2002).
25. E. Knill and R. Laflamme, Phys. Rev. A 55, 900 (1997).
26. E. Knill, R. Laflamme, A. Ashikhmin, H. Barnum, L. Viola, and W.H. Zurek, Los Alamos Sci. 27, 188 (2002).
27. L.-A. Wu and D.A. Lidar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 207902 (2002).
28. D. Bacon, J. Kempe, D.A. Lidar, and K.B. Whaley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1758 (2000).
29. P. Zanardi and S. Lloyd, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 067902 (2003).
30. L. Viola, E.M. Fortunato, M.A. Pravia, E. Knill, R. Laflamme, and D.G. Cory, Science (Washington, DC, U.S.) 293, 2059 (2001).
31. S. Gheorghiu-Svirschevski, Phys. Rev. A 66, 032101 (2002).
32. C.-P. Yang and J. Gea-Banacloche, Phys. Rev. A 63, 022311 (2001).
33. D.A. Lidar and K.B. Whaley, e-print quant-ph/0301032.
34. K. Kraus, States, Effects, and Operations (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1983).
35. M. Burrow, Representation Theory of Finite Groups (Academic Press, New York, 1965).
36. W. Arveson, An Imitation to C*-Algebras (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1976), pp. 17-22.
37. N.P. Landsman, e-print math-ph/9807030.
38. W. Thirring, A Course in Mathematical Physics (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1983), Vol. 4, pp. 35-37.
39. The "identity action" of the relevant error operators on a DOF of the system, as expressed by Eq. (5), remains the key (necessary and sufficient) condition for characterizing NSs without reference to a dagger-closed algebraic structure as invoked here. Such a generalization may be relevant to handle open-system evolutions directly described in terms of master equations, see, for instance, Ref. [40].
40. J. Kempe, D. Bacon, D.A. Lidar, and K.B. Whaley, Phys. Rev. A 63, 042307 (2001).
41. P.G. Kwiat, A.J. Berglund, J.B. Altepeter, and A.G. White, Science (Washington, DC, U.S.) 290, 498 (2000).
42. D. Kielpinski, V. Meyer, M.A. Rowe, C.A. Sackett, W.M. Itano, C. Monroe, and D.J. Wineland, Science (Washington, DC, U.S.) 291, 1013 (2001).
43. E.M. Fortunate, L. Viola, J. Hodges, G. Teklemariam, and D.G. Cory, New J. Phys. 4, 5.1 (2002).
44. R.R. Ernst, G. Bodenhausen, and A. Wokaun, Principles of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance in One and Two Dimensions (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1994).
45. P. Zanardi, Phys. Rev. A 60, R729 (1999).
46. J. Kempe, D. Bacon, D.P. DiVincenzo, and K.B. Whaley, Quantum Inf. Comput. 1, 33 (2001).
47. T.F. Havel, Y. Sharf, L. Viola, and D.G. Cory, Phys. Lett. A 280, 282 (2001).
48. D.A. Lidar and L.-A. Wu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 017905 (2001).
49. L.-A. Wu, M.S. Byrd, and D.A. Lidar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 127901 (2002).
50. A. G. Redfield, Advances in Magnetic Resonance (Academic Press, New York, 1965), Vol. 1.
51. L. Viola and E.M. Fortunato, Los Alamos Sci. 27, 260 (2002).
52. A. Peres, Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1995), p. 132.
53. z.
54. L. Masanes, G. Vidal, and J.I. Latorre, Quantum Inf. Comput. 2, 285 (2002).
55. L. Viola and E. Knill, e-print quant-ph/0303165.
56. D.G. Cory et al., Fortschr. Phys. 48, 875 (2000).
57. G. Teklemariam, E.M. Fortunate, M.A. Pravia, T.F. Havel, and D.G. Cory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5845 (2001).
58. I.L. Chuang, N.A. Gershenfeld, M. Kubinec, and D.W. Leung, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 454, 447 (1998).
59. P. Zanardi and F. Rossi, Phys. Rev. B 59, 8170 (1999).
60. D.P. DiVincenzo, D. Bacon, J. Kempe, G. Burkard, and K.B. Whaley, Nature (London) 408, 339 (2000).
61. (Z) [cf. Eqs. (37) and (22)] simply reflects a 90° rotation in the basis states of the physical and abstract syndrome, respectively.
62. J.A. Jones and E. Knill, J. Magn. Reson. 141, 322 (1999).
63. Note that, if desired, application of the noise during the entire evolution period could be effected at the expenses of modulating the gradient Hamiltonian during each decoupling subinterval so as to compensate for the rotations due to the refocusing pulses. See Ref. [17] for related ideas on fast-switched control schemes.
64. A. Sodickson and D.G. Cory, Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 33, 77 (1998).
65. D.G. Cory, W. Maas, M. Price, E. Knill, R. Laflamme, W.H. Zurek, T.F. Havel, and S.S. Somaroo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 2152 (1998).
66. B. Schumacher, Phys. Rev. A 54, 2614 (1996).
67. E. Knill, R. Laflamme, R. Martinez, and C. Negrevergne, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5811 (2001).
68. C.H. Bennett, D.P. DiVincenzo, J.A. Smolin, and W.K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. A 54, 3824 (1996).
69. A.M. Childs, I.L. Chuang, and D.W. Leung, Phys. Rev. A 64, 012314 (2001).
70. T.F. Havel, J. Math. Phys. 44, 534 (2003).