Design and synthesis of a new binucleating ligand via cobalt-promoted C-N bond fusion reaction. Ligand isolation and its coordination to nickel, palladium, and platinum

Inorganic Chemistry

Volumn 42, Issue 17, 2003, Pages 5367-5375

  Kamar, Kunal K ^a   Das, Srijit ^a   Hung, Chen Hsiung ^b   Castiñeiras, Alfonso ^c   Kuz'min, Michael D ^d   Rillo, Conrado ^d   Bartolomé, Juan ^d   Goswami, Sreebrata ^a  

^a DEPARTMENT OF MATERIALS SCIENCE   (India)

^b NATIONAL CHANGHUA UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION   (Taiwan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SANTIAGO DE COMPOSTELA   (Spain)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ZARAGOZA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINE; AMINOPYRIDINE DERIVATIVE; CARBON; COBALT COMPLEX; COORDINATION COMPOUND; LIGAND; METAL COMPLEX; NICKEL; NICKEL COMPLEX; NITROGEN; PALLADIUM; PALLADIUM COMPLEX; PHENYL GROUP; PLATINUM; PLATINUM COMPLEX; POTASSIUM DERIVATIVE; PYRIDINE DERIVATIVE; SODIUM DERIVATIVE;

ACCELERATION; AMINATION; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CHEMICAL BINDING; CHEMICAL BOND; CHEMICAL REACTION; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; COMPLEX FORMATION; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; EXTRACTION; HIGH TEMPERATURE; MAGNETISM; MEASUREMENT; PROTON TRANSPORT; REACTION ANALYSIS; SPECTROSCOPY; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; SYNTHESIS; TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCE; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY;

EID: 0042509901     PISSN: 00201669     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ic034313h     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. (a) Chakravarty, A. R.; Cotton, F. A.; Tocher, D. A. Organometallics 1985, 4, 863.
2. (b) Chakravarty, A. R.; Cotton, F. A.; Falvello, L. R. Inorg. Chem. 1986, 25, 214.
3. (c) Chakravarty, A. R.; Cotton, F. A. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1986, 113, 19.
4. Saha, A.; Majumdar, P.; Goswami, S. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 2000, 1703.
5. Saha, A.; Majumdar, P.; Peng, S.-M.; Goswami, S. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2000, 2631.
6. Das, C.; Ghosh, A. K.; Hung, C.-H.; Lee, G.-H.; Peng, S.-M.; Goswami, S. Inorg. Chem. 2002, 41, 7125.
7. Das, C.; Peng, S.-M.; Lee, G.-H.; Goswami, S. New J. Chem. 2002, 26, 222.
8. Das, C.; Saha, A.; Hung, C.-H.; Lee, G.-H.; Peng, S.-M.; Goswami, S. Inorg. Chem. 2003, 42, 198.
9. Saha, A.; Ghosh, A. K.; Majumdar, P.; Mitra, K. N.; Mondal, S.; Rajak, K. K.; Falvello, L. R.; Goswami, S. Organometallics 1999, 18, 3772.
10. Das, S.; Hung, C.-H.; Goswami, S. Inorg. Chem., in press.
11. Mahapatra, A. K. Ph.D. Thesis, Jadavpur University, Calcutta, India, 1986.
12. Saha, A.; Das, C.; Peng, S.-M.; Goswami, S. Indian J. Chem., Sect. A 2001, 40A, 198.
13. (a) Aullón, G.; Lledós, A.; Alvarez, S. Inorg. Chem. 2000, 39, 906.
14. (b) Holland, P. L.; Andersen, R. A.; Bergman, R. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 1092.
15. (c) Hope, H.; Olmstead, M. M.; Murray, B. D.; Power, P. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 712.
16. This may also happen due to geometric reason. For a bis-chelating bidentate ligand, forming two five-member chelate rings, the M-N bond length for the middle nitrogen is smaller than those for the terminal nitrogens.
17. (a) Pramanik, N. C.; Pramanik, K.; Ghosh, P.; Bhattacharya, S. Polyhedron 1998, 17, 1525.
18. (b) Matsumoto, N.; Motoda, Y.; Matsuo, T.; Nakashima, T.; Re, N.; Dahan, F.; Tuchagues, J.-P. Inorg. Chem. 1999, 38, 1165.
19. (c) Bruin, B. De.; Bill, E.; Bothe, E.; Weyhermuller, T.; Wieghardt, K. Inorg. Chem. 2000, 39, 2936.
20. Ginsberg, A. P.; Martin, R. L.; Brookes, R. W.; Sherwood, R. C. Inorg. Chem. 1972, 11, 2884.
21. Neglect of the interdimer exchange interaction in the above approach is justified by the weakness of that interaction. Thus, between 1.8 and 5 K, the susceptibility follows the Curie-Weiss law, χ = C/(T - θ), with C = 4.2 K emu/mol and θ ≈ -2 K. The interdimer exchange integral is then estimated as zJ′ = 0/4 -0.5 K, z being the number of nearest neighbors. On the other hand, D < 0. hence the ground state of the dimer is a nonmagnetic singlet, therefore the presence of the small interdimer interaction, z|J′| ≪ |D|, is irrelevant. Any possibility of a positive zero-field splitting can be ruled out, since this would have meant a doublet ground state and a Curie-Weiss behavior with a much smaller Curie constant. C = 2.3 K emu/mol. This conclusion holds regardless of the interdimer interaction, which affects θ but not C.
22. Nanda, K. K.; Thompson, L. K.; Bridson, J. N.; Nag, K. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1994, 1337.
23. (a) Laskowski, E. J.; Felthouse, T. R.; Hendrickson, D. N.; Long, G. Inorg. Chem. 1976, 15, 2908.
24. (b) Journaux, Y.; Kahan, O. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1979, 1575.
25. (a) Ribas, J.; Monfort, M.; Diaz, C.; Bastos, C.; Solans, X. Inorg. Chem. 1993, 32, 3557.
26. (b) Karmakar T. K.; Chandra, S. K.; Ribas, J.; Mostafa, G.; Lu, T. H.; Ghosh, B. K. Chem. Commun. 2002, 2364.
27. (c) Ribas, J.; Monfort, M.; Ghosh, B. K.; Solans, X. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1994, 33, 2087 and references therein.
28. Mohanta, S.; Nanda, K. K.; Werner, R.; Haase, W.; Mukherjee, A. K.; Dutta, S. K.; Nag, K. Inorg. Chem. 1997, 36, 4656 and references therein.
29. Mealli, C.; Proserpio, D. M. J. Chem. Educ. 1990, 67, 399.
30. (a) Chattopadhyay, P.; Nayak, M. K.; Bhattacharya, S. P.; Sinha, C. Polyhedron 1997. 16, 1291.
31. (b) Basuli, F.; Chattopadhyay, P.; Sinha, C. Polyhedron 1996, 15, 2439.
32. (a) Sheldrick, G. M. Acta Crystallogr. 1990, 46A, 467.
33. (b) Sheldrick, G. M. SHELXS-97, Program for the Solution of Crystal Structures; University of Göttingen: Göttingen, Germany, 1997.
34. Sheldrick, G. M. SHELXL-97, Program for the Refinement of Crystal Structures; University of Göttingen: Göttingen, Germany, 1997.