Establishing the technical adequacy of functional behavioral assessment: Conceptual and measurement challenges

Behavioral Disorders

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 282-298

  Gresham, Frank M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042415283     PISSN: 01987429     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/019874290302800305     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: Author.
2. Arndorfer, R., Miltenberger, R., Woster, S., Rortvedt, A., & Gaffaney, T. (1994). Home-based descriptive and experimental analysis of problem behaviors in children. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 14, 64-87.
3. Baer, D. (1977a). Reviewer's comment: Just because it's reliable doesn't mean you can use it. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 117-119.
4. Baer, D. (1977b). Perhaps it would be better not to know everything. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 167-172.
5. Boyajian, A., DuPaul, G., Handler, M., Eckert, T., & McGoey, K. (2001). The use of classroom-based brief functional assessment with preschoolers at-risk for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. School Psychology Review, 30, 278-293.
6. Broussard, C., & Northrup, J. (1995). An approach to functional assessment and analysis of disruptive behavior in regular education classrooms. School Psychology Quarterly, 10, 151-164.
7. Broussard, C., & Northrup, J. (1997). The use of functional analysis to develop peer interventions for disruptive classroom behavior. School Psychology Quarterly, 12, 65-76.
8. Busk, P., & Serlin, R. (1992). Meta-analysis for single case research. In T. Kratochwill & J. Levin (Eds.), Single-case research design and analysis (pp. 187-212). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Campbell, D., & Fiske, D. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multi-method matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81-105.
10. Carr, E. (1994). Emerging themes in functional analysis of problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 393-400.
11. Cone, J. (1978). The Behavioral Assessment Grid (BAG): A conceptual framework and taxonomy. Behavior Therapy, 9, 882-888.
12. Cone, J. (1981). Psychometric considerations. In M. Hersen & A. Bellack (Eds.), Behavioral assessment: A practical handbook (pp. 38-70). New York: Pergamon.
13. Cone, J. (1986). Idiographic, nomothetic, and related perspectives in behavioral assessment. In R. Nelson & S. Hayes (Eds.), Conceptual foundations of behavioral assessment (pp. 111-128). New York: Guilford.
14. Cooper, J., Heron, T., & Heward, W. (1987). Applied behavior analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
15. Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. New York: Holt.
16. Cronbach, L., Gleser, G., Nanda, H., & Rajaratnam, N. (1972). The dependability of behavioral measures. New York: Wiley.
17. DeProspero, A., & Cohen, S. (1979). Inconsistent visual analysis of intrasubject data. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12, 573-579.
18. Drasgow, E., & Yell, M. (2001). Functional behavioral assessments: Legal requirements and challenges. School Psychology Review, 30, 239-251.
19. Drasgow, E., Yell, M., Bradley, R., & Shriner, J. (1999). The IDEA Amendments of 1997: A school-wide model for conducting functional behavioral assessments and developing behavior intervention plans. Education and Treatment of Children, 22, 244-266.
20. Dunlap, G., & Childs, K. (1996). Intervention research in emotional and behavioral disorders: An analysis of studies from 1980-1993. Behavioral Disorders, 21, 275-291.
21. Ervin, R., Radford, P., Bertsch, K., Piper, A., Ehrhardt, K., & Poling, A. (2001). A descriptive analysis and critique of the empirical literature on school-based functional assessment. School Psychology Review, 30, 193-210.
22. Fisch, G. (1998). Visual inspection of data revisited: Do the eyes still have it? The Behavior Analyst, 27, 111-123.
23. Fox, J., Conroy, M., & Heckaman, K. (1998). Research issues in functional assessment of challenging behavior. Behavioral Disorders, 24, 26-33.
24. Gresham, F. M. (1998). Designs for evaluation behavior change: Conceptual principles of single case methodology. In T. S. Watson & F. M. Gresham (Eds.), Handbook of child behavior therapy (pp. 23-40). New York: Plenum.
25. Gresham, F. M., & Lambros, K. (1998). Behavioral and functional assessment. In T. S. Watson & F. M. Gresham (Eds.), Handbook of child behavior therapy (pp. 3-22). New York: Plenum.
26. Gresham, F. M., & Lopez, M. (1996). Social validation: A unifying concept for school-based research and practice. School Psychology Quarterly, 11, 204-227.
27. Gresham, F. M., McIntyre, L. L., Olson-Tinker, H., Dolstra, L., McLaughlin, V., & Van, M. (2002). Relevance of school-based studies in Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis for functional behavioral assessment and positive behavioral support: 1991-1999. Manuscript submitted for publication.
28. Gresham, F. M., Watson, T. S., & Skinner, C. (2001). Functional behavioral assessment: Principles, procedures, and future directions. School Psychology Review, 30, 156-172.
29. Hagopian, L., Fisher, W., Thompson, R., Owen-DeSchryver, J., Iwata, B., & Wacker, D. (1997). Toward the development of structured criteria for interpretation of functional analysis data. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 313-326.
30. Hartmann, D. (1977). Considerations in the choice of interobserver reliability estimates. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 103-116.
31. Hayes, S. (1981). Single case experimental design and empirical clinical practice. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 193-211.
32. Hayes, S., Nelson, R., & Jarrett, R. (1987). The treatment utility of assessment. American Psychologist, 42, 963-974.
33. Hopkins, B., & Hermann, J. (1977). Evaluating inter-observer reliability of interval data. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 121-126.
34. Individuals With Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997, Pub. L. No. 105-17. 20 U.S.C. 33, §1400 et seq. (West, 1997).
35. Iwata, B., Dorsey, M. Slifer, K. Bauman, K., & Richman, G. (1982). Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 2, 3-20. (Reprinted in journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1994, 27, 196-209).
36. Iwata, B., Pace, G., Dorsey, M., Zarcone, J., Vollmer, T., Smith, et al. (1994). The functions of self-injurious behavior: An experimental epidemiological analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 215-240.
37. Johnston, J., & Pennypacker, H. (1993). Strategies and tactics of behavioral research (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
38. Kazdin, A. (1977). Artifact, bias, and complexity of assessment: The ABCs of reliability. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 141-150.
39. Knapp, T. (1983). Behavior analysts' visual appraisal of behavior change in graphic display. Behavioral Assessment, 5, 155-164.
40. Kratochwill, T., & Shapiro, E. (2000). Conceptual foundations of behavioral assessment in schools. In E. Shapiro & T. Kratochwill (Eds.), Behavioral assessment in schools: Theory, research, and clinical foundations (2nd ed., pp. 3-13). New York: Guilford.
41. Kratochwill, T., & Wetzel, R. (1977). Observer agreement, credibility, and judgment: Some considerations in presenting observer agreement data. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 133-139.
42. Lane, K., Umbreit, J., & Beebe-Frankenberger, M. (1999). Functional assessment research on students with or at-risk for EBD: 1990 to present. Journal of Positive Behavioral Interventions, 1, 101-111.
43. Linehan, M. (1980). Content validity: Its relevance to behavioral assessment. Behavioral Assessment, 2, 147-159.
44. Mace, F. C. (1994). The significance and future of functional analysis methodologies. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 385-392.
45. Macmann, G., & Barnett, D. (1999). Diagnostic decision making in school psychology: Understanding and coping with uncertainty. In C. Reynolds & T. Gutkin (Eds.), Handbook of school psychology (3rd ed., pp. 519-548). New York: Wiley.
46. Matyas, T., & Greenwood, K. (1990). Visual analysis of single-case time series: Effects of variability, serial dependence, and magnitude of intervention effects. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 341-351.
47. Matyas, T., & Greenwood, K. (1991). Problems in the estimation of autocorrelation in brief time series and some implications for behavioral data. Behavioral Assessment, 13, 137-157.
48. McComas, J., & Mace, F. C. (2000). Theory and practice in conducting functional assessment. In E. Shapiro & T. Kratochwill (Eds.), Behavioral assessment in schools: Theory, research, and clinical foundations (2nd ed., pp. 78-103). New York: Guilford.
49. Meehl, P., & Rosen, A. (1955). Antecedent probability and the efficiency of psychometric signs, patterns, or cutting scores. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 194-216.
50. Michael, J. (1974). Statistical inference for individual organism research: Mixed blessing or curse? Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 7, 647-653.
51. Nelson, J. R., Roberts, M., Mathur, S. R., & Rutherford, R. B. (1999). Has public policy exceeded our knowledge base? A review of the functional behavioral assessment literature. Behavioral Disorders, 24, 169-179.
52. Nelson, R., Hayes, S., & Jarrett, R. (1986). Evaluating the quality of behavioral assessment. In R. Nelson & S. Hayes (Eds.), Conceptual foundations of behavioral assessment (pp. 461-503). New York: Guilford.
53. Nelson, R., Hayes, & Jarrett, R. (1987). The treatment utility of assessment: A functional approach to evaluating assessment quality. American Psychologist, 42, 963-974.
54. Northrup, J., Broussard, C., Jones, K., George, T., Vollmer, T., & Hering, M. (1995). The differential effects of teacher and peer attention on the disruptive behavior of three children with a diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 227-228.
55. Northrup, J., & Culley, V. (2001). Some contributions of functional analysis to the assessment of behaviors associated with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and the effects of stimulant medication. School Psychology Review, 30, 227-238.
56. Northrup, J., Wacker, D., Sasso, G., Steege, M., Cigrand, K., Cook, J., & DeRaad, A. (1994). A brief functional analysis of aggressive and alternative behavior in an outclinic setting. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 509-522.
57. Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, J. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
58. Office of Technology Assessment. (1978). Assessing the efficacy and safety of medical technologies. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. (Stock No. 052-003-00593-0)
59. O'Neill, R., Horner, R., Albin, R., Storey, K., & Sprague, J. (1997). Functional assessment and program development for behavior problems. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
60. Ottenbacher, K. (1990). When is a picture worth a thousand p values? A comparison of visual and quantitative methods to analyze single case data. The Journal of Special Education, 23, 436-449.
61. Peterson, L., Homer, A., & Wunderlich, S. (1982). The integrity of independent variables in behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 75, 477-492.
62. Reed, H., Thomas, E., Sprague, J., & Horner, R. (1997). The student-guided functional assessment interview: An analysis of student and teacher agreement. Journal of Behavioral Education, 7, 33-49.
63. Reid, R., & Nelson, J. R. (2002). The utility, acceptability, and practicality of functional behavioral assessment for students with high-incidence problem behaviors. Remedial and Special Education, 23, 15-23.
64. Sasso, G. (1999, September). Reliability and validity in functional assessment: Unsubstantiated claims and wishful thinking. Paper presented at the Council for Children with Behavioral Disorders National Conference, Dallas, TX.
65. Sasso, G., Conroy, M., Stichler, J., & Fox, J. (2001). Slowing down the bandwagon: The misapplication of functional assessment for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 26, 282-296.
66. Schill, M., Kratochwill, T., & Elliott, S. (1998). Functional assessment in behavioral consultation: A treatment utility study. School Psychology Quarterly, 13, 116-140.
67. Scruggs, T., & Mastropieri, M. (1998). Summarizing single subject research: Issues and applications. Behavior Modification, 22, 221-242.
68. Shriver, M., Anderson, C., & Proctor, B. (2001). Evaluating the validity of functional behavioral assessment. School Psychology Review, 30, 180-192.
69. Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Free Press.
70. Stage, S., & Quiroz, D. (1997). A meta-analysis of interventions to decrease disruptive classroom behavior in public education settings. School Psychology Review, 26, 333-368.
71. Sterling-Turner, H., Robinson, S., & Wilczynski, S. (2001). Functional assessment of distracting and disruptive behaviors in the school setting. School Psychology Review, 30, 211-226.
72. Strosahl, K., & Linehan, M. (1986). Basic issues in behavioral assessment. In A. Ciminero, K. Calhoun, & H. Adams (Eds.), Handbook of behavioral assessment (2nd ed., pp. 12-46). New York: Wiley Interscience.
73. Suen, H. (1990). Principles of test theories. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
74. Vollmer, T., & Northrup, J. (1996). Some implications of functional analysis for school psychology. School Psychology Quarterly, 11, 76-92.
75. Wampold, B., & Furlong, M. (1981). The heuristics of visual inference. Behavioral Assessment, 3, 79-92.
76. Wiggins, J. (1973). Personality and prediction: Principles of personality assessment. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
77. Witt, J., Daly, E., & Noell, G. (2000). Functional assessments: A step-by-step guide to solving academic and behavior problems. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
78. Wolf, M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203-214.
79. Woolery, M., Bailey, D., & Sugai, G. (1988). Effective teaching: Principles and procedures of applied behavior analysis with exceptional students. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
80. Yeaton, W. (1988). Treatment effect norms. In J. Witt, S. Elliott, & F. Gresham (Eds.), Handbook of behavior therapy in education (pp. 171-187). New York: Plenum.