Managerial ratings of in-role behaviors, organizational citizenship behaviors, and overall performance: Testing different models of their relationship

Journal of Business Research

Volumn 51, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 145-155

  Barksdale, Kevin ^a   Werner, Jon M ^b  

^a Chuck Hutton Chevrolet Co   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN WHITEWATER   (United States)

Author keywords

Halo; In role behavior; Organizational citizenship behavior; Overall performance

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042371969     PISSN: 01482963     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0148-2963(99)00061-2     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Barnard CI The functions of the executive. 1938;Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
2. Balzer WK, Sulsky LM Halo and performance appraisal research: a critical examination. J Appl Psychol. 77:1992;975-985.
3. Barrick MR, Mount MK The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: a meta-analysis. Pers Psychol. 44:1991;1-26.
4. Bateman TS, Organ DW Job satisfaction and the good soldier: the relationship between affect and employee citizenship. Acad Manage J. 26:1983;587-595.
5. Becker TE, Vance RJ Construct validity of three types of organizational citizenship behavior: an illustration of the direct product model with refinements. J Manage. 19:1993;663-682.
6. Bentler PM, Chou CP Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociol Methods Res. 16:1987;78-117.
7. Bollen KA Structural Equations with Latent Variables. 1989;Wiley, New York.
8. Borman WC, Motowidlo SJ Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. Schmitt N, Borman WC Personnel Selection in Organizations. 1993;71-98 Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
9. Browne MW, Cudeck R Alternative ways of assessing fit. Bollen K, Long JS Testing Structural Equation Models. 1993;132-162 Sage Press, Newbury Park.
10. Burke MJ, Borucki CC, Hurley AE Reconceptualizing psychological climate in a retail service environment: a multiple stakeholder perspective. J Appl Psychol. 77:1992;717-729.
11. Campbell JP Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. Dunnette MD, Hough LM 2nd edn. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. vol. 1:1990;687-732 Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA.
12. Campbell JP Job Performance: Theories of Determinants and Factor Structure. 1993;Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Francisco. Comments as symposium discussant (April).
13. Campbell JP, McCloy RA, Oppler SH, Sager CE A theory of performance. Schmitt N, Borman WC Personnel Selection in Organizations. 1993;35-70 Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
14. Cascio WF Costing Human Resources: The Financial Impact of Behavior in Organizations. 4th ed. 1991;PWS Kent, Boston.
15. Cooper W Ubiquitous halo. Psychol Bull. 90:1981;218-244.
16. Costa PT Jr., McCrae RR The NEO Personality Inventory. 1985;Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa, FL.
17. Digman JM Personality structure: emergence of the five-factor model. Annu Rev Psychol. 41:1990;417-440.
18. Feldman JM Beyond attribution theory: cognitive processes in performance appraisal. J Appl Psychol. 66:1981;127-148.
19. Futoran GC, Hunt JG, Rivera JB The temporal impact of management faculty style and course characteristics. Group Organ Manage. 20:1995;310-326.
20. George JM, Brief AP Feeling good-doing good. Psycol Bull. 112:1992;310-329.
21. Ghiselli EE, Brown CW Personnel and Industrial Psychology. 1955;Wiley, New York.
22. Goldberg LR The structure of phenotypic personality traits. Am Psychol. 48:1993;26-34.
23. Graham JW. Organizational citizenship behavior: construct redefinition, operationalization, and validation. Unpublished manuscript. Loyola University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 1989.
24. Harmon HH Modern Factor Analysis. 1967;Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago.
25. Harvey RJ The future of partial correlations as a means to reduce halo in performance ratings. J Appl Psychol. 67:1982;171-176.
26. Hogan J, Ones DS Conscientiousness and integrity at work. Hogan R, Johnson JA, Briggs SA Handbook of Personality Psychology. 1997;849-870 Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
27. Hulin CL Some reflections on general performance dimensions and halo rating error. J Appl Psychol. 67:1982;165-170.
28. Joreskog KG, Sorbom D LISREL 7: A Guide to the Program and Applications. 2nd edn. 1989;SPSS, Chicago.
29. Katz D, Kahn RL Some recent findings in human relations research. Swanson GE, Newcomb TE, Hartley EL Readings in Social Psychology. 1952;650-665 Holt, New York.
30. Katz D, Kahn RL The Social Psychology of Organizations. 2nd edn. 1978;Wiley, New York.
31. Lance CE. Personal communication, October 15, 1995.
32. Lance CE, LaPointe JA, Fisicaro SA Tests of three causal models of halo rater error. Organ Behav Hum Decis Processes. 57:1994;83-96.
33. Lance CE, LaPointe JA, Stewart AM A test of context dependency of three causal models of halo rater error. J Appl Psychol. 79:1994;332-340.
34. Lance CE, Woehr DJ, Fisicaro SA Cognitive categorization processes in performance evaluation: Confirmatory tests of two models. J Organ Behav. 12:1991;1-20.
35. Landy FJ, Vance RJ, Barnes-Farrell JL, Steele JW Statistical control of halo error in performance ratings. J Appl Psychol. 65:1980;501-506.
36. MacKenzie SB, Podsakoff PM, Fetter R Organizational citizenship behavior and objective productivity as determinants of managerial evaluations of salespersons' performance. Organ Behav Hum Decis Processes. 50:1991;123-150.
37. Marsh HW, Antill JK, Cunningham JD Masculinity and feminity: A bipolar construct and independent constructs. J Pers. 57:1989;625-663.
38. McAllister D. Regrounding organizational citizenship behavior research. Paper presented at the Academy of Management, Miami, FL, 1991.
39. McDonald R, Marsh H Choosing a multivariate model: noncentrality and goodness of fit. Psychol Bull. 107:1990;247-255.
40. McNeely BL, Meglino BM The role of dispositional and situational antecedents in prosocial organizational behavior: an examination of the intended beneficiaries of prosocial behavior. J Appl Psychol. 79:1994;836-844.
41. Medsker GJ, Williams LJ, Holahan PJ A review of current practices for evaluating causal models in organizational behavior and human resources management research. J Manage. 20:1994;439-464.
42. Moorman RH Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? J Appl Psychol. 76:1991;845-855.
43. Moorman RH, Blakely GL Individualism-collectivism as an individual difference predictor of organizational citizenship behavior. J Organ Behav. 16:1995;127-142.
44. Morrison EW Role definitions and organizational citizenship behavior: the importance of the employee's perspective. Acad Manage J. 37:1994;1543-1567.
45. Motowidlo SJ, Van Scotter JR Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance. J Appl Psychol. 79:1994;475-480.
46. Mulaik SA, James LR, Van Alstine J, Bennett N, Lind S, Stilwell CD Evaluation of goodness of fit indices for structural equation models. Psychol Bull. 105:1989;430-445.
47. Murphy KR Difficulties in the statistical control of halo. J Appl Psychol. 67:1982;161-164.
48. Murphy KR, Balzer WK Rater errors and rating accuracy. J Appl Psychol. 74:1989;619-624.
49. Murphy KR, Cleveland JN Understanding Performance Appraisal: Social, Organizational, and Goal-Based Perspectives. 1995;Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
50. Murphy KR, Shiarella AH Implication of the multidimensional nature of job performance for the validity of selection tests: multivariate frameworks for studying test validity. Pers Psychol. 50:1997;823-854.
51. Nathan BR, Lord RG Cognitive categorization and dimensional schemata: a process approach to the study of halo in performance ratings. J Appl Psychol. 68:1983;102-114.
52. O'Reilly C III, Chatman J Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: the effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on pro-social behaviors. J Appl Psychol. 71:1986;492-499.
53. Organ DW Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Good Soldier Syndrome. 1988;Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.
54. Organ DW The motivational basis of organizational citizenship behavior. Res Organ Behav. 12:1990;43-72.
55. Organ DW Personality and organizational citizenship behavior. J Manage. 20:1994;465-478.
56. Organ DW Organizational citizenship behavior: it's construct clean-up time. Hum Perform. 10:1997;85-97.
57. Organ DW, Konovsky M Cognitive versus affective determinants of organizational citizenship behavior. J Appl Psychol. 74:1989;157-164.
58. Organ DW, Ryan K A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior. Pers Psychol. 48:1995;775-802.
59. Orr JM, Sackett PR, Mercer M The role of prescribed and nonprescribed in estimating the dollar value of performance. J Appl Psycol. 74:1989;34-40.
60. Ostroff C The relationship between satisfaction, attitudes, and performance: an organizational level analysis. J Appl Psychol. 77:1992;963-974.
61. Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB Organizational citizenship behaviors and sales unit effectiveness. J Mark Res. 31:1994;351-363.
62. Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Hui C Organizational citizenship behaviors and managerial evaluations of employee performance: a review and suggestions for future research. Res Pers Hum Resour Manage. 11:1993;1-40.
63. Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Moorman RH, Fetter R Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers' trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Leadership Q. 1:1990;107-142.
64. Podsakoff PM, Organ DW Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects. J Manage. 12:1986;531-544.
65. Shore LM, Barksdale K, Shore TH Managerial perceptions of employee commitment. Acad Manage J. 38:1995;1593-1615.
66. Shore LM, Tetrick L A construct validity of the survey of organizational support. J Appl Psychol. 76:1991;637-643.
67. Shore LM, Wayne SJ Commitment and employee behavior: comparison of affective commitment and continuance commitment with perceived organizational support. J Appl Psychol. 78:1993;774-780.
68. Smith CA, Organ DW, Near JP Organizational citizenship behaviors: it's nature and antecedents. J Appl Psychol. 68:1983;453-463.
69. Tompson HB, Werner JM The impact of role conflict/facilitation on core and discretionary behaviors: testing a mediated model. J Manage. 23:1997;583-601.
70. Tornow WW Editor's note: introduction to special issue on 360-degree feedback. Hum Resour Manage. 32(2-3):1993;211-219.
71. Van Dyne L, Cummings LL. Extra-role behaviors: the need for onstruct and definitional clarity. Paper presented at the Academy of Management, San Francisco, 1990.
72. Van Dyne L, Cummings LL, Parks JM Extra role behaviors: in pursuit of construct and definitional clarity (a bridge over muddied waters). Cummings LL, Staw BM Research in Organizational Behavior. vol. 17:1995;215-285 JAI, Greenwich, CT.
73. Van Dyne L, Graham JW, Dienesch RM Organizational citizenship behavior: construct redefinition, measurement, and validation. Acad Manage J. 37:1994;765-802.
74. Van Scotter JR, Motowidlo SJ Interpersonal facilitation and job dedication as separate facets of contextual performance. J Appl Psychol. 81:1996;525-531.
75. Viswesvaran C, Schmidt FL, Ones DS. Are different aspects of job performance correlated? A meta-analysis. Paper presented at the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Francisco, April, 1993.
76. Waldman DA The contributions of total quality management to a theory of work performance. Acad Manage Rev. 19:1994;510-536.
77. Werner JM Dimensions that make a difference: examining the impact of in-role and extrarole behaviors on supervisory ratings. J Appl Psychol. 79:1994;98-107.
78. Werner JM Implications of OCB and contextual performance for human resource management. Hum Resour Manage Rev. 10:2000;3-24.
79. Wexley KN, Yukl GA Organizational Behavior and Personnel Psychology. 1984;Irwin, Homewood, IL.
80. Williams LJ, Anderson SE Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. J Manage. 17:1991;601-618.
81. Williams LJ, Anderson SE An alternative approach to method effects by using latent-variable models: applications in organizational behavior research. J Appl Psychol. 79:1994;323-331.