Magnitude and kinetics of rehydration influence the viability of dehydrated E. coli K-12

Biotechnology and Bioengineering

Volumn 83, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 578-582

  Mille, Yannick ^a   Beney, Laurent ^a   Gervais, Patrick ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE BOURGOGNE   (France)

Author keywords

Escherichia coli; Kinetic; Osmotic stress; Recovery; Vesicles; Volume

Indexed keywords

CELLS; OSMOSIS; REACTION KINETICS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

REHYDRATION;

ESCHERICHIA COLI;

GLYCEROL; WATER;

ARTICLE; BACTERIAL GROWTH; CULTURE MEDIUM; DEHYDRATION; ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; ESCHERICHIA COLI K 12; KINETICS; NONHUMAN; OSMOTIC STRESS; REHYDRATION; SURVIVAL;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; APOPTOSIS; CELL COUNT; CELL DIVISION; CELL MEMBRANE; DESICCATION; ESCHERICHIA COLI; KINETICS; OSMOTIC PRESSURE; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; WATER;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); ESCHERICHIA COLI; ESCHERICHIA COLI K12;

EID: 0042367743     PISSN: 00063592     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bit.10706     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Becker MJ, Rapoport AI. 1987. Conservation of yeasts by dehydration. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 35:127-171.
2. Beney L, Marechal PA, Gervais P. 2001. Coupling effects osmotic pressure and temperature on the viability of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 56:513-516.
3. Geankoplis CJ. 1978. Transport processes and unit operation. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. 650 p.
4. Kedem O, Katchalsky A. 1958. Thermodynamic analysis of the permeability of biological membranes to non-electrolytes. Biochim Biophys Acta 27:229-246.
5. Laroche C, Beney L, Marechal PA, Gervais P. 2001, The effect of osmotic pressure on the membrane fluidity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae at different physiological temperatures. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 56: 249-254.
6. Mille Y, Beney L, Gervais P. 2002. Viability of Escherichia coli after combined osmotic and thermal treatment: a plasma membrane implication. Biochim Biophys Acta 1567:41-48.
7. Norrish RS. 1966. An equation for the activity coefficients and equilibrium relative humidities of the water in confectionery syrups. J Food Technol 1:25-39.
8. Poirier I, Marechal PA, Evrard C, Gervais P. 1998. Escherichia coli and Lactobacillus plantarum responses to osmotic stress. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 50:704-709.
9. Poirier I, Marechal PA, Richard S, Gervais P. 1999. Saccharomyces cerevisiae viability is strongly dependent on rehydration kinetics temperatures of dried cells. J Appl Microbiol 86:87-92.
10. Schwarz H, Koch A L. 1995. Phase and electron microscopic observations of osmotically induced wrinkling and the role of endocytotic vesicles in the plasmolysis of the Gram-negative cell wall. Microbiology 141: 3161-3170.
11. Sleator RD, Hill C. 2002. Bacterial osmoadaptation: the role of osmolytes in bacterial stress and virulence. FEMS Microbiol Rev 26:49-71.
12. Steponkus PL. 1999. Freeze-induced dehydration and the cryostability of biological membranes. In: Roos YH, Leslie RB, Lillford PJ, editors. Water management in the design and distribution of quality foods. ISOPOW 7. Lancaster, PA: Technomic Publishing Company, Inc. p 53-85.
13. Teixeira P, Castro H, Kirby R. 1995. Spray drying as a method for preparing concentrated culture of Lactobacillus bulgaricus. J Appl Microbiol 78:456-462.