Brain representation of object-centered space in monkeys and humans

Annual Review of Neuroscience

Volumn 26, Issue , 2003, Pages 331-354

  Olson, Carl R ^a,b  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Attention; Neglect; Object aligned; Vision

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ATTENTION; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EYE MOVEMENT; HUMAN; MONKEY; NEGLECT; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; NONHUMAN; OBJECT RELATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION; SPATIAL ORIENTATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION;

ANIMALS; ATTENTION; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; BRAIN; COGNITION; EYE MOVEMENTS; FORM PERCEPTION; HAPLORHINI; HUMANS; NEURONS; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PERCEPTUAL DISORDERS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SACCADES; SPACE PERCEPTION;

EID: 0042357449     PISSN: 0147006X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.26.041002.131405     Document Type: Review

References (85)

1. Apfeldorf M. 1962. Perceptual and conceptual processes in a case of left-sided spatial inattention. Percept. Mot. Skills 14:419-23
2. Arguin M, Bub DN. 1993. Evidence for an independent stimulus-centered spatial reference frame from a case of visual hemineglect. Cortex 29:349-57
3. Batista AP, Newsome WT. 2001. Supplementary eye field activity precedes superior colliculus activity in a sensory decision-making task. Program No. 59.8. Abstr. Viewer/Itinerary Planner. Washington, DC: Soc. Neurosci. http://apu.sfn.org
4. Behrmann M, Geng JJ. 2003. What is "left" when all is said and done? Spatial coding and hemispatial neglect. In The Cognitive and Neural Bases of Neglect, ed. H-O Karnath, AD Milner, G Vallar. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
5. Behrmann M, Moscovitch M. 1994. Object-centered neglect in patients with unilateral neglect: effects of left-right coordinates of objects. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 6:1-16
6. Behrmann M, Moscovitch M, Black SE, Mozer M. 1990. Perceptual and conceptual mechanisms in neglect dyslexia: two contrasting case studies. Brain 113:1163-83
7. Behrmann M, Tipper SP. 1994. Object-based attentional mechanisms: evidence from patients with unilateral neglect. In Attention and Performance, ed. C Umilta, M Moscovitch, pp. 351-75. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Vol. 15
8. Behrmann M, Tipper SP. 1999. Attention accesses multiple reference frames: evidence from visual neglect. J. Exper. Psychol.: Human Percept. Perform. 25:83-101
9. Behrmann M, Watt S, Black SE, Barton JJS. 1997. Impaired visual search in patients with unilateral neglect: an oculographic analysis. Neuropsychologia 35:1445-58
10. Bisiach E, Luzzatti C. 1978. Unilateral neglect of representational space. Cortex 14:129-33
11. Breznen B, Andersen RA. 2002. Activity of SEF neurons in an object-based saccade task. Program No. 57.13. Abstr. Viewer/Itinerary Planner. Washington, DC: Soc. Neurosci. http://apu.sfn.org
12. Buxbaum LJ, Coslett HB. 1994. Neglect of chimeric figures: two halves are better than a whole. Neuropsychologia 32:275-88
13. Buxbaum LJ, Coslett HB, Montgomery MW, Farah MJ. 1996. Mental rotation may underlie apparent object-based neglect. Neuropsychologia 34:113-26
14. Caramazza A, Hillis AE. 1990. Levels of representation, co-ordinate frames, and unilateral neglect. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 7:391-445
15. Dassonville P, Schlag J, Schlag-Rey M. 1995. The use of egocentric and exocentric location cues in saccadic programming. Vision Res. 35:2191-99
16. Deneve S, Pouget A. 1998. Neural basis of object-centered representations. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 10, ed. MI Jordan, MJ Kearns, S Solla. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
17. De Renzi E, Gentillini M, Faglioni P, Barbieri C. 1989. Attentional shift towards the rightmost stimuli in patients with left visual neglect. Cortex 25:231-37
18. Doricchi F, Galati G. 2000. Implicit semantic evaluation of object symmetry and contralesional visual denial in a case of left unilateral neglect with damage of the dorsal paraventricular white matter. Cortex 36:337-50
19. Driver J. 1999. Egocentric and object-based visual neglect. In The Hippocampal and Parietal Foundations of Spatial Cognition, ed. N Burgess, KJ Jeffery, J O'Keefe, pp. 67-89. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
20. Driver J, Baylis GC, Goodrich SJ, Rafal RD. 1994. Axis-based neglect of visual shapes. Neuropsychologia 32:1353-65
21. Driver J, Baylis GC, Rafal RD. 1992. Preserved figure-ground segregation and symmetry perception in visual neglect. Nature 360:73-75
22. Driver J, Halligan PW. 1991. Can visual neglect operate in object-centred co-ordinates? An affirmative single-case study. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 8:475-96
23. Driver J, Pouget A. 2000. Object-centered visual neglect, or relative egocentric neglect? J. Cogn. Neurosci. 12:542-45
24. Edelman JA, Kristjánsson A, Nakayama K. 2002. Object-centered instructions influence short-latency saccadic eye movements. Program No. 622.11. Abstr. Viewer/Itinerary Planner. Washington, DC: Soc. Neurosci. http://apu.sfn.org
25. Farah MJ, Brunn JL, Wong AB, Wallace MA, Carpenter PA. 1990. Frames of reference for allocating attention to space: evidence from the neglect syndrome. Neuropsychologia 28:335-47
26. Farah MJ, Buxbaum LJ. 1997. Object-based attention in visual neglect: conceptual and empirical distinctions. In Parietal Lobe Contributions to Orientation in 3D Space, ed. P Their, H-O Karnath, pp. 385-400. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer
27. Gainotti G, Messerli P, Tissor R. 1972. Qualitative analysis of unilateral spatial neglect in relation to laterality of cerebral lesions. J. Neurol., Neurosurg., Psychiary 35:545-50
28. Gettner SN, Olson CR. 1997. Object-centered direction selectivity in macaque supplementary eye field is expressed with respect to multiple axes. Soc. Neurosci. 23:17 (Abstr.)
29. Gettner SN, Olson CR. 1998. Object-centered direction selectivity in macaque SEF persists across changes in object orientation. Soc. Neurosci. 24: 263 (Abstr.)
30. Gibson BS, Egeth H. 1994. Inhibition of return to object-based and environment-based locations. Percept. Psychophys. 55:323-39
31. Gnadt JW, Bracewell RM, Andersen RA. 1991. Sensorimotor transformation during eye movements to remembered visual targets. Vision Res. 31:693-715
32. Halligan PW, Marshall JC. 1993. When two is one: a case study of spatial parsing in visual neglect. Perception 22:309-12
33. Halligan PW, Marshall JC. 1994. Figural perception and parsing in visuo-spatial neglect. NeuroReport 5:537-39
34. Hayhoe MM, Lachter J, Moeller P. 1992. Spatial memory and integration across saccadic eye movements. In Eye Movements and Visual Cognition, ed. K Rayner, pp. 130-45. New York: Springer-Verlag
35. Hillis AE, Caramazza A. 1990. The effects of attentional deficits on reading and spelling. In Cognitive Neuropsychology and Neurolinguistics: Advances in Models of Cognitive Function and Impairment, ed. A Caramazza, pp. 211-275. London, UK: Erlbaum
36. Hillis AE, Rapp B. 1998. Unilateral spatial neglect in dissociable frames of reference: a comment on Farah, Brunn, Wong, Wallace, and Carpenter (1990). Neuropsychologia 36:1257-62
37. Hillis AE, Rapp B, Benzing L, Caramazza A. 1998. Dissociable coordinate frames of unilateral spatial neglect: "viewer-centered" neglect. Brain Cogn. 37:491-526
38. Horwitz GD. 1999. Signals in the superior colliculus related to target selection and perceptual decision making. PhD thesis. Stanford Univ. 173 pp.
39. Horwitz GD, Newsome WT. 1999. Separate signals for target selection and movement specification in the superior colliculus. Science 284:1158-61
40. Humphreys GW, Heinke D. 1998. Spatial representation and selection in the brain: neuropsychological and computational constraints. Vis. Cogn. 5:9-47
41. Karn KS, Moller P, Hayhoe MM. 1997. Reference frames in saccadic targeting. Exp. Brain Res. 115:267-82
42. Karnath H-O. 1994. Spatial limitation of eye movements during ocular exploration of simple line drawings in neglect syndrome. Cortex 30:319-30
43. Karnath H-O, Huber W. 1992. Abnormal eye movement behaviour during text reading in neglect syndrome: a case study. Neuropsychologia 30:593-98
44. Karnath H-O, Niemeier M. 2002. Task-dependent differences in the exploratory behaviour of patients with spatial neglect. Neuropsychologia 40:1577-85
45. Karnath H-O, Niemeier M, Dichgans J. 1998. Space exploration in neglect. Brain 121:2357-67
46. Kristjánsson A, Mackeben M, Nakayama K. 2001. Rapid, object-based learning in the deployment of transient attention. Perception 30:1375-87
47. Ládavas E, Petronio A, Umiltà C. 1990. The deployment of visual attention in the intact field of hemineglect patients. Cortex 26:307-17
48. Maljkovic V, Nakayama K. 1996. Priming of pop-out: II. The role of position. Percept. Psychophys. 58:977-91
49. Marr D, Nishihara HK. 1978. Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 200:269-94
50. Marshall JC, Halligan PW. 1993. Visuo-spatial neglect: a new copying test to assess perceptual parsing. J. Neurol. 240:37-40
51. Marshall JC, Halligan PW. 1994. The yin and the yang of visuo-spatial neglect: a case study. Neuropsychologia 32:1037-57
52. Moorman DE, Olson CR. 2002. Neurons in monkey supplementary eye field exhibit object-centered selectivity even without training on an object-centered task. Program No. 57:12. Abstr. Viewer/Itinerary Planner. Washington, DC: Soc. Neurosci. http://apu.sfn.org
53. Mozer M. 1999. Explaining object-based deficits in unilateral neglect without object-based frames of reference. Prog. Brain Res., 121:99-119
54. Mozer M. 2002. Frames of reference in unilateral neglect and visual perception: a computational perspective. Psychol. Rev. 109:156-85
55. Mozer MC, Behrmarm M. 1992. Reading with attentional impairments: a brain-damaged model of neglect and attentional dyslexias. In Connectionist Approaches to Natural Language Processing, ed. RG Reilly, NE Sharkey, pp. 409-60. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum
56. Nichelli P, Venneri A, Pentore R, Cubelli R. 1993. Horizontal and vertical neglect dyslexia. Brain Lang. 44:264-83
57. Niemeier M, Karnath H-O. 2002. Simulating and testing visual exploration in spatial neglect based on a new model for cortical coordinate transformation. Exp. Brain Res. 145:512-19
58. Niemeier M, Karnath H-O. 2003. The exploration of space and objects in neglect. In The Cognitive and Neural Bases of Spatial Neglect, ed. H-O Karnath, AD Milner, G Valar. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
59. Niki H. 1974. Prefrontal unit activity during delayed alternation in the monkey. II. Relation to absolute versus relative direction of response. Brain Res. 68:197-204
60. Ogden JA. 1985a. Anterior-posterior interhemispheric differences in the loci of lesions producing visual hemineglect. Brain Cogn. 4:59-75
61. Ogden JA. 1985b. Contralesional neglect of constructed visual images in right and left brain-damaged patients. Neuropsychologia 23:273-77
62. Olshausen BA, Anderson CH, VanEssen DC. 1993. A neurobiological model of visual attention and invariant pattern recognition based on dynamic routing of information. J. Neurosci. 13:4700-19
63. Olson CR, Gettner SN. 1995. Object-centered direction selectivity in the supplementary eye field of the macaque monkey. Science 269:985-88
64. Olson CR, Gettner SN. 1999. Macaque supplementary eye field neurons encode object-centered directions of eye movements regardless of the visual attributes of instructional cues. J. Neurophysiol. 81:2340-46
65. Olson CR, Gettner SN, Tremblay L. 1999. Representation of allocentric space in the monkey frontal lobe. In Spatial Functions of the Hippocampal System and the Parietal Lobe, ed. N Burgess, K Jeffery, J O'Keefe, pp. 359-80. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
66. Olson CR, Tremblay L. 2000. Macaque supplementary eye field neurons encode object-centered locations relative to both continuous and discontinuous objects. J. Neurophysiol. 83:2392-411
67. Pasupathy A, Connor CE. 1999. Responses to contour features in macaque area V4. J. Neurophysiol. 82:2490-502
68. Pasupathy A, Connor CE. 2001. Shape representation in area V4: position-specific tuning for boundary conformation. J. Neurophysiol. 86:2505-19
69. Pavlovskaya M, Glass I, Soroker N, Blum B, Groswasser Z. 1997. Coordinate frame for pattern recognition in unilateral spatial neglect. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 9:824-34
70. Pouget A, Deneve S, Sejnowski TJ. 1999. Frames of reference in hemineglect: a computational approach. Prog. Brain Res. 121:81-97
71. Pouget A, Sejnowski TJ. 1997. A new view of hemineglect based on the response properties of parietal neurons. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 352:1449-59
72. Rizzo M, Hurtig R. 1992. Visual search in hemineglect; what stirs idle eyes? Vis. Sci. 7:39-52
73. Sabes PN, Breznen B, Andersen RA. 2002. Parietal representation of object-based saccades. J. Neurophysiol. 88:815-29
74. Schall JD. 1991. Neuronal activity related to visually guided saccadic eye movements in the supplementary motor area of rhesus monkeys. J. Neurophysiol. 66:530-58
75. Schlag J, Schlag-Rey M. 1985. Unit activity related to spontaneous saccades in the frontal dorsomedial cortex of the monkey. Brain Res. 58:208-11
76. Schlag J, Schlag-Rey M. 1987. Evidence for a supplementary eye field. J. Neurophysiology 57:179-200
77. Subbiah I, Caramazza A. 2000. Stimulus-centered neglect in reading and object recognition. Neurocase 6:13-31
78. Tipper SP, Behrmann M. 1996. Object-centered not scene-based visual neglect. J. Exper. Psychol.: Human Percept. Perform. 22:1261-78
79. Tremblay L, Gettner SN, Olson CR. 2002. Neurons with object-centered spatial selectivity in macaque SEF: Do they represent locations or rules? J. Neurophysiology 87:333-50
80. Umiltà C, Castiello U, Fontana M, Vestri A. 1995. Visual Cogn. 2:165-81
81. Walker R. 1995. Spatial and object-based neglect. Neurocase 1:371-83
82. Walker R, Findlay JM. 1997. Eye movement control in spatial and object-based neglect. In Parietal Lobe Contributions to Orientation in 3D Space, ed. P Their, H-O Karnath, pp. 201-18. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer
83. Walker R, Findlay JM, Young AW, Lincoln NB. 1996. Saccadic eye movements in object-based neglect. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 13:569-615
84. Walker R, Young AW. 1996. Object-based neglect: an investigation of the contributions of eye movements and perceptual completion. Cortex 32:279-95
85. Young AW, Hellawell DJ, Welch J. 1992. Neglect and visual recognition. Brain 115:51-71