Differential characteristics of the middle latency auditory evoked magnetic responses to interstimulus intervals

Clinical Neurophysiology

Volumn 114, Issue 8, 2003, Pages 1513-1520

  Onitsuka, Toshiaki ^a,b   Ninomiya, Hideaki ^c   Sato, Eigo ^a   Yamamoto, Tomoya ^a   Tashiro, Nobutada ^a  

^a KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c Fukuoka Pref Dazaifu Hosp P   (Japan)

Author keywords

Auditory evoked magnetic responses; Differential characteristics; Interstimulus intervals; Magnetoencephalography; Middle latency

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIPOLE; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; MAGNETIC FIELD; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIGHT HANDEDNESS;

EID: 0042346354     PISSN: 13882457     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1388-2457(03)00110-X     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Adler L.E., Pachtman E., Franks R.D., Pecevich M., Waldo M.C., Freedman R. Neurophysiological evidence for a defect in neuronal mechanisms involved in sensory gating in schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry. 17:1982;639-654.
2. Borgmann C., Roß B., Draganova R., Pantev C. Human auditory middle latency responses: influence of stimulus type and intensity. Hear Res. 158:2001;57-64.
3. Buchwald J.S., Erwin R.J., Read S., Van Lancker D., Cummings J.L. Midlatency auditory evoked responses: differential abnormality of P1 in Alzheimer's disease. Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol. 74:1989;378-384.
4. Buchwald J.S., Erwin R., Van Lancker D., Gutherie D., Schwafel J., Tanguay P. Midlatency auditory evoked responses: P1 abnormalities in adult autistic subjects. Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol. 84:1992;164-171.
5. Buchwald J.S., Rubinstein E.H., Schwafel J., Strandburg R.J. Midlatency auditory evoked responses: differential effects of a cholinergic agonist and antagonist. Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol. 80:1991;303-309.
6. Cacace A.T., Satya-Murti S., Wolpaw J.R. Human middle-latency auditory evoked potentials: vertex and temporal components. Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol. 77:1990;6-18.
7. Cardenas A.T., McCallin K., Hopkins R., Fein G. A comparison of the repetitive click and conditioning-testing P50 paradigms. Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol. 104:1997;157-164.
8. Deiber M.P., Ibanez V., Fischer C., Perrin F., Mauguiere F. Sequential mapping favours the hypothesis of distinct generators for Na and Pa middle latency auditory evoked potentials. Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol. 71:1988;187-197.
9. Erwin R.J., Buchwald J.S. Midlatency auditory evoked responses: differential recovery cycle characteristics. Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol. 64:1986;417-423.
10. Erwin R.J., Buchwald J.S. Midlatency auditory evoked responses: differential effects of sleep in the human. Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol. 65:1986;383-392.
11. Freedman R., Adler L.E., Waldo M.C., Pachtman E., Franks R.D. Neurophysiological evidence for a detect in inhibitory pathways in schizophrenia: comparison of medicated and drug-free patients. Biol Psychiatry. 18:1983;537-551.
12. Godey B., Schwartz D., de Graaf J.B., Chauvel P., Liégeois-Chauvel C. Neuromagnetic source localization of auditory evoked fields and intracerebral evoked potentials: a comparison of data in the same patients. Clin Neurophysiol. 112:2001;1850-1859.
13. Hashimoto I., Mashiko T., Yoshikawa K., Mizuta T., Imada T., Hayashi M. Neuromagnetic measurements of the human primary auditory cortex. Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol. 96:1995;348-356.
14. Huizenga H.M., van Zuijen T.L., Heslenfeld D.J., Molenaar P.C. Simultaneous MEG and EEG source analysis. Phys Med Biol. 49:2001;533-539.
15. Ishibashi H., Tobimatsu S., Shigeto H., Morioka T., Yamamoto T., Fukui M. Differential interaction of somatosensory inputs in the human primary sensory cortex: a magnetoencephalographic study. Clin Neurophysiol. 111:2000;1095-1102.
16. Jacobson P.G., Kraus N., McGee J.T. Hearing as reflected by middle and long latency event-related potentials. Alford B.R., Jerger J., Jenkins H.A. Advances in Otorhinolaryngology. 53:1997;46-84 Basel, Karger.
17. Japaridze G., Shakarishvili R., Kevanishvili Z. Auditory brainstem, middle-latency, and slow cortical responses in multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand. 106:2002;47-53.
18. Javitt D.C., Jayachandra M., Lindsley R.W., Specht C.M., Schroeder C.E. Schizophrenia-like deficits in auditory P1 and N1 refractoriness induced by the psychomimetic agent phencyclidine (PCP). Clin Neurophysiol. 111:2000;833-836.
19. Jessen F., Kucharski C., Fries T., Papassotiropoulos A., Hoenig K., Maier W., Heun R. Sensory gating deficit expressed by a disturbed suppression of the P50 event-related potential in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Am J Psychiatry. 158:2001;1319-1321.
20. Kakigi R. Somatosensory evoked magnetic fields following median nerve stimulation. Neurosci Res. 20:1994;165-174.
21. Kanno A., Nakasato N., Maruyama N., Yoshimoto T. Middle and long latency peak sources in auditory evoked magnetic fields for tone bursts in humans. Neurosci Lett. 293:2000;187-190.
22. Kodera K., Yamada O., Yamane H., Suzuki J.I. Effects of number and interstimulus interval of tone pips on fast responses. Audiology. 17:1978;500-510.
23. Kraus N., Smith D.I., McGee T. Midline and temporal lobe MLRs in the guinea pig originate from different generator systems: a conceptual framework for new and existing data. Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol. 70:1988;541-548.
24. Kraus N., McGee T., Littman T., Nicol T. Reticular formation influences on primary and non-primary auditory pathways as reflected by the middle latency response. Brain Res. 587:1992;186-194.
25. Lee Y.S., Lueders H., Dinner D.S., Lesser R.P., Hahn J., Klem G. Recording of auditory evoked potentials in man using chronic subdural electrodes. Brain. 107:1984;115-131.
26. Liégeois-Chauvel C., Musolino A., Badier J.M., Marquis P., Chauvel P. Evoked potentials recorded from the auditory cortex in man: evaluation and topography of the middle latency components. Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol. 92:1994;204-214.
27. Mäkelä J.P., Hämäläinen M., Hari R., McEvoy L. Whole-head mapping of middle-latency auditory evoked magnetic fields. Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol. 92:1994;414-421.
28. McEvoy L., Mäkelä J.P., Hämäläinen M., Hari R. Effect of interaural time differences on middle-latency and late auditory evoked magnetic fields. Hear Res. 78:1994;249-257.
29. McFarland W.H., Virion M.C., Wolf K.E., Goldstein R. Reexamination of effects of stimulus rate and number on the middle components of the averaged electroencephalic response. Audiology. 14:1975;456-465.
30. Miyazato H., Skinner R.D., Reese N.B., Boop F.A., Garcia-Rill E. A middle-latency auditory-evoked potential in the rat. Brain Res Bull. 37:1995;247-255.
31. Nagamoto H.T., Adler L.E., Waldo M.C., Freedman R. Sensory gating in schizophrenics and normal controls: effects of changing stimulation interval. Biol Psychiatry. 25:1989;549-561.
32. Neylan T.C., Fletcher D.J., Lenoci M., McCallin K., Weiss D.S., Schoenfeld F.B., Marmar C.R., Fein G. Sensory gating in chronic posttraumatic stress disorder: reduced auditory P50 suppression in combat veterans. Biol Psychiatry. 46:1999;1656-1664.
33. Ninomiya H., Onitsuka T., Chen C.-H., Kinukawa N. Possible overlapping potentials of the auditory P50 in humans: factor analysis of middle latency auditory evoked potentials. Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol. 104:1997;23-30.
34. Onitsuka T., Ninomiya H., Sato E., Yamamoto T., Tashiro N. The effect of interstimulus intervals and between-block rests on the auditory evoked potential and magnetic field: Is the auditory P50 in humans an overlapping potential? Clin Neurophysiol. 111:2000;237-245.
35. Pantev C., Bertrand O., Eulitz C., Verkindt C., Hampson S., Schuierer G., Elbert T. Specific tonotopic organizations of different areas of the human auditory cortex revealed by simultaneous magnetic and electric recordings. Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol. 94:1995;24-40.
36. Polyakov A., Pratt H. Three-channel Lissajous' trajectory of human middle latency auditory evoked potentials. Ear Hear. 15:1994;390-399.
37. Rademacher J., Morosan P., Schormann T., Schleicher A., Werner C., Freund H.J., Zilles K. Probabilistic mapping and volume measurement of human primary auditory cortex. Neuroimage. 13:2001;669-683.
38. Reese N.B., Garcia-Rill E., Skinner R.D. Auditory input to the pedunculopontine nucleus: I. Evoked potentials. Brain Res Bull. 37:1995;257-264.
39. Reite M., Teale P., Zimmerman J., Davis K., Whalen J. Source location of a 50 ms latency auditory evoked field component. Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol. 70:1988;490-498.
40. Sarvas J. Basic mathematical and electromagnetic concepts of the biomagnetic inverse problem. Phys Med Biol. 32:1987;11-22.
41. Scherg M., Hari R., Hämäläinen M. Frequency-specific source of the auditory N19-P30-P50 response detected by a multiple source analysis of evoked magnetic fields and potentials. Williamson S.J., Hoke M., Stroink G., Kotani M. Advances in biomagnetism. 1989;97-100 Plenum Press, New York, NY.
42. Wallace M.N., Johnston P.W., Palmer A.R. Histochemical identification of cortical areas in the auditory region of the human brain. Exp Brain Res. 143:2002;499-508.
43. Wood C.C., Wolpaw J.R. Scalp distribution of human auditory evoked potentials: II. Evidence for overlapping sources and involvement of auditory cortex. Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol. 54:1982;25-38.
44. Woods D.L., Clayworth C.C., Knight R.T., Simpson G.V., Naeser M.A. Generators of middle- and long-latency auditory evoked potentials: implications from studies of patients with bitemporal lesions. Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol. 68:1987;132-148.
45. Yamamoto T., Williamson S.J., Kaufman L., Nicholson C., Llinás R. Magnetic localization of neuronal activity in the human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 85:1988;8732-8736.
46. Yoshiura T., Ueno S., Iramina K., Masuda K. Source localization of middle latency auditory evoked magnetic fields. Brain Res. 703:1995;139-144.
47. Yvert B., Crouzeix A., Bertrand O., Seither-Preisler A., Pantev C. Multiple supratemporal sources of magnetic and electric auditory evoked middle latency components in humans. Cereb Cortex. 11:2001;411-423.
48. Zouridakis G., Boutros N.N. Stimulus parameter effects on the P50 evoked response. Biol Psychiatry. 32:1992;839-841.