A comparison of the repetitive click and conditioning-testing P50 paradigms

Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology - Evoked Potentials

Volumn 104, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 157-164

  Cardenas, Valerie A ^a,b   McCallin, Keith ^a,b   Hopkins, Rachel ^a,b   Fein, George ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Auditory P1; Auditory P50; C T ratio; Event related potentials; Interstimulus interval; Singular value decomposition

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CONDITIONING; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0031106344     PISSN: 01685597     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-5597(97)96093-7     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Adler, L.E., Pachtman, E., Franks, R.D., Pecevich, M., Waldo, M.C. and Freedman, R. Neurophysiological evidence for a defect in neuronal mechanisms involved in sensory gating in schizophrenia. Biol. Psychiatry, 1982, 17: 639-654.
2. Adler, L.E., Waldo, M.C., Tatcher, A., Cawthra, E., Baker, N. and Freedman, R. Lack of relationship of auditory gating defects to negative symptoms in schizophrenia. Schizophr. Res., 1990, 3: 131-138.
3. Boutros, N.N., Overall, J. and Zouridakis, B. Test-retest reliability of the P50 mid-latency auditory evoked response. Psychiatry Res., 1991, 29: 181-192.
4. Buchwald, J.S., Erwin, R.J., Read, S., Van Lancker, D. and Cummings, J.L. Midlatency auditory evoked responses: differential abnormality of P1 in Alzheimer's disease. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1989, 74: 378.
5. Buchwald, J.S., Erwin, R., Van Lancker, D., Guthrie, D., Schwafel, J. and Tanguay, P. Midlatency auditory evoked responses: P1 abnormalities in adult autistic subjects. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1992, 84: 164-171.
6. Cardenas, V.A., Yingling, C.D., Jewett, D. and Fein, G.A. Multichannel model-free method for estimation of event-related potential amplitudes and its comparison to dipole source localization. J. Med. Eng. Technol., 1995, 19: 88-98.
7. Cardenas, V., Gill, P. and Fein, G. Human P50 amplitude and suppression are not affected by variation in wakeful alertness. Biol. Psychiatry, 1997, in press.
8. Davis, H., Mast, T., Yoshie, M. and Zerlin, S. The slow response of the human cortex to auditory stimuli: recovery process. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1966, 21: 105-113.
9. De Lugt, D.R., Loewy, D.H. and Campbell, K.B. The effect of sleep onset on event related potentials with rapid rates of stimulus presentation. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1996, 98: 484-492.
10. Erwin, R. and Buchwald, J.S. Midlatency auditory evoked responses: differential effects of sleep in the human. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1986a, 65: 383-392.
11. Erwin, R.J. and Buchwald, J.S. Midlatency auditory evoked responses: differential recovery cycle characteristics. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1986b, 64: 417-423.
12. Erwin, R.J., Mawhinney-Hee, M., Gur, R.C. and Gur, R.E. Midlatency auditory evoked responses in schizophrenia. Biol. Psychiatry, 1991, 30: 430-432.
13. Fein, G., Biggins, C. and VanDyke, C. The auditory P50 response is normal in Alzheimer's disease when measured via a paired click paradigm. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1994, 92: 536-545.
14. Fein, G., Biggins, C. and MacKay, S. Cocaine abusers have reduced auditory P50 amplitude and suppression compared to both normal controls and alcoholics. Biol. Psychiatry, 1996, 39: 955-965.
15. Freedman, R., Adler, L.E., Waldo, M.C., Pachtman, E. and Franks, R.D. Neurophysiological evidence for a defect in inhibitory pathways in schizophrenia: comparison of medicated and drug-free patients. Biol. Psychiatry, 1983, 18: 537-551.
16. Freedman, R., Adler, L.E., Garhardt, G.A., Waldo, M., Baker, N., Rose, G.M., Drebing, C., Nagamoto, H., Bickford-Wimer, P. and Franks, R. Neurobiological studies of sensory gating in schizophrenia. Schizophr. Bull., 1987, 13: 669-678.
17. Fruhstorfer, H., Soveri, P. and Jarvilehto, T. Short-term habituation of auditory evoked response in man. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1970, 28: 153-161.
18. Gasser, T., Sroka, L. and Möcks, J. The transfer of EOG activity into the EEG for eyes open and closed. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1985, 61: 181-193.
19. Green, J.B., Flagg, L., Freed, D.M. and Schwankhaus, J.D. The middle latency auditory evoked potentials may be abnormal in dementia. Neurology, 1992, 42: 1034-1036.
20. Griffith, J.M., Waldo, M., Adler, L.E. and Freedman, R. Normalization of auditory sensory gating in schizophrenic patients after a brief period of sleep. Psychiatry Res., 1993, 49: 29-39.
21. Grillon, C., Ameli, R. and Braff, D.L. Middle latency auditory evoked potentials (MAEPs) in chronic schizophrenics. Schizophr. Res., 1991, 5: 61-66.
22. Jerger, K., Biggins, C. and Fein, G. P50 suppression is not affected by attentional manipulation. Biol. Psychiatry, 1992, 31: 365-377.
23. Lehmann, D. and Skrandies, W. Spatial analysis of evoked potentials in man: a review. Progr. Neurobiol., 1984, 23: 227-250.
24. Loveless, N., Hari, R., Hämäläinen, M. and Tiihonen, J. Evoked responses of human auditory cortex may be enhanced by preceding stimuli. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1989, 74: 217-227.
25. Näätänen, R. and Picton, T. The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology, 1987, 24: 375-425.
26. Nagamoto, H.T., Adler, L.E., Waldo, M.C. and Freedman, R. Sensory gating in schizophrenics and normal controls: effects of changing stimulation interval. Biol. Psychiatry, 1989, 25: 549-561.
27. Nagamoto, H.T., Adler, L.E., Waldo, M.C., Griffith, J. and Freedman, R. Gating of auditory response in schizophrenics and normal controls. Effects of recording site and stimulation interval on the P50 wave. Schizophr. Res., 1991, 4: 31-40.
28. Woods, D.L. and Clayworth, C.C. Age-related changes in human middle latency auditory evoked potentials. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1986, 65: 297-303.