On the operability of continuous processes

Control Engineering Practice

Volumn 11, Issue 8, 2003, Pages 859-869

  Georgakis, Christos ^a   Uztürk, Derya ^a   Subramanian, Sivakumar ^a   Vinson, David R ^a  

^a Lehigh University   (United States)

Author keywords

Controllability; Integration of design and control; Minimum time optimal control; Operability; Operability index

Indexed keywords

CONFORMAL MAPPING; CONTROL EQUIPMENT; FEEDBACK CONTROL; OPTIMAL CONTROL SYSTEMS;

OPERABILITY;

PROCESS CONTROL;

DESIGN; INDUSTRIAL PLANT; PROCESS CONTROL; PROCESS PLANNING;

EID: 0042303809     PISSN: 09670661     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0967-0661(02)00217-4     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Anderson, J. S. (1966). A practical problem in dynamic heat transfer. Chemical Engineering, CE97-CE103.
2. Arkun, Y. (1988). Relative sensitivity: A dynamic closed-loop interaction measure and design tool. A.I.Ch.E. Journal, 34(4), 672-675.
3. Bahri, P. A., Bandoni, J. A., & Romagnoli, J. A. (1996). Effect of disturbance in optimizing control: Steady-state open-loop backoff problem. A.I.Ch.E. Journal, 42(4), 983-994.
4. Bahri, P. A., Bandoni, J. A., & Romagnoli, J. A. (1997). Integrated flexibility and controllability analysis in design of chemical processes. A.I.Ch.E. Journal, 43(4), 997-1015.
5. Cao, Y., Biss, D., & Perkins, J. D. (1996). Assessment of input-output controllability in the presence of control constraints. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 20(4), 337-346.
6. Carvallo, F. D. (1989). Design of chemical processes for controllability. Ph.D. thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, USA.
7. Chenery, S. D. (1997). Process controllability analysis using linear and nonlinear optimization. Ph.D. thesis, University of London, UK.
8. Dimitriadis, V. D., & Pistikopoulos, E. N. (1995). Flexibility analysis of dynamic systems. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research. 34, 4451-4462.
9. Downs, J. J., & Ogunnaike, B. (1994). Design for control and operability: An industrial perspective. In L. T. Biegler, & M. F. Doherty (Eds.). Foundations of computer aided process design (pp. 115-123). Colorado: CACHE.
10. Fisher, W. R., Doherty, M. F., & Douglas, J. M. (1988). The interface between design and control. 1. Process controllability. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 27, 597-605.
11. Grosdidier, P., & Morari, M. (1986). Analysis of interactions using structured singular values. In ACC Proceedings, Seattle, WA (pp. 658-663).
12. Grosdidier, P., Morari, M., & Holt, B. R. (1985). Closed-loop properties from steady-state gain information. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, Fundamentals, 24, 221-235.
13. Grossman, I. E., & Floudas, C. A. (1987). Active constraint strategy for flexibility analysis in chemical processes. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 11, 675-693.
14. Holt, B. R., & Morari, M. (1985a). Design of resilient processing plants V: The effect of dead time on dynamic resilience. Chemical Engineering Science, 40(7), 1229-1237.
15. Holt, B. R., & Morari, M. (1985b). Design of resilient processing plants VI: The effect of right-half-plane zeros on dynamic resilience. Chemical Engineering Science, 40(1), 59-74.
16. Hovd, M., & Skogestad, S. (1992). Simple frequency dependent tools for control system analysis, structure selection and design. Automatica, 28(4), 989-996.
17. Lewin, D. R. (1996). A simple tool for disturbance resiliency diagnosis and feedforward control design. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 20(1), 13-25.
18. Lyman, P. R., Luyben, W. L., & Tyréus, B. D. (1996). Method for assessing the effect of design parameters on controllability. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 35, 3484-3497.
19. Manousiouthakis, V., Savage, R., & Arkun, Y. (1986). Synthesis of decentralized process control structured using the concept of block relative gain. A.I.Ch.E. Journal, 32(6), 991-1003.
20. McAvoy, T. J. (1983). Interaction analysis. Monograph Series. Research Triangle Park, USA: Instrument Society of America.
21. Mohideen, M. J., Perkins, J. D., & Pistikopoulos, E. N. (1996). Optimal design of dynamic systems under uncertainty. A.I.Ch.E. Journal, 42(8), 2251-2272.
22. Moore, B. C. (1986). Application of singular value decomposition to the design, analysis, and control of industrial processes. In ACC Proceedings, Scattle, WA (pp. 643-650).
23. Morari, M. (1983). Design of resilient processing plants-III. A general framework for the assessment of dynamic resilience. Chemical Engineering Science, 38, 1881-1891.
24. Morari, M. (1992). Effect of design on the controllability of chemical plants. In Perkins, J. D. (Ed.), Interactions between process design and process control (pp. 3-16). Oxford: Pergamon.
25. Morari, M., & Perkins, J. (1994). Design for operations. In L. T. Biegler, & M. F. Doherty (Eds.). Foundations of computer aided process design (pp. 105-114). Colorado: CACHE.
26. Perkins, J. D., & Walsh, S. P. K. (1996). Optimization as a tool for design/control integration. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 20, 315-323.
27. Psarris, P., & Floudas, C. A. (1991a). Dynamic operability of MIMO systems with time delays and transmission zeroes-1: Assessment. Chemical Engineering Science, 46(10), 2691-2707.
28. Psarris, P., & Floudas, C. A. (1991b). Dynamic operability of MIMO systems with time delays and transmission zeroes-2: Enhancement. Chemical Engineering Science, 46(10), 2709-2728.
29. Russo, L. P., & Bequette, B. W. (1995). Impact of process design on the multiplicity behavior of a jacketted exothermic CSTR. A.I.Ch.E. Journal, 41, 135-147.
30. Russo, L. P., & Bequette, B. W. (1998). Operability of chemical reactors: multiplicity behaviour of jacketted styrene polymerization reactor. Chemical Engineering Science, 53, 27-45.
31. Skogestad, S., & Morari, M. (1987a). Design of resilient processing plants IX: The effect of model uncertainty on dynamic resilience. Chemical Engineering Science, 42(7), 1765-1780.
32. Skogestad, S., & Morari, M. (1987b). Effect of disturbance directions on closed-loop performance. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 26, 2029-2035.
33. Skogestad, S., & Postlethwaite, I. (1996). Multivariable feedback control. New York: Wiley.
34. Stanley, G., Marino-Galarraga, M., & McAvoy, T. J. (1985). Shortcut operability analysis 1: The relative disturbance gain. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, Process Design and Development, 24, 1181-1188.
35. Subramanian, S., & Georgakis, C. (2000). Steady-state operability characteristics of reactors. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 24, 1563-1568.
36. Subramanian, S., & Georgakis, C. (2001). Steady-state operability characteristics of idealized reactors. Chemical Engineering Science, 56, 5111-5130.
37. Subramanian, S., Uztürk, D., & Georgakis, C. (2001). An optimization-based approach for the operability analysis of continuously stirred tank reactors. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 40, 4238-4252.
38. Swaney, R. E., & Grossmann, I. E. (1985a). An index for operational flexibility in chemical process design. Part 1: Formulation and theory. A.I.Ch.E. Journal, 31, 621-630.
39. Swaney, R. E., & Grossmann, I. E. (1985b). An index for operational flexibility in chemical process design. Part II: Computational algorithms. A.I.Ch.E. Journal, 31, 631-641.
40. Swartz, C. L. E. (1996). A computational framework for dynamic operability assessment. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 20(4), 365-371.
41. Uztürk, D., & Georgakis, C. (1998). An optimal control perspective on the inherent dynamic operability of processes. In Annual A.I.Ch.E. Meeting, Miami, FL, Paper 217a.
42. Uztürk, D., & Georgakis, C. (2002). Inherent dynamic operability of processes: General definitions and analysis of SISO cases. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 41, 421-432.
43. Vinson, D. R. (2000). A new measure of process operability for the improved steady-state design of chemical processes. Ph.D. thesis, Lehigh University, USA.
44. Vinson, D. R., & Georgakis, C. (1998). A new measure of process output controllability. In Georgakis, C. (Ed.), DYCOPS-5, proceedings of the fifth IFAC symposium on dynamics and control of process systems (pp. 700-709).
45. Vinson, D. R., & Georgakis, C. (2000). A new measure of process output controllability. Journal of Process Control, 10, 185-194.
46. Zhu, Z.-X., Lee, J., & Edgar, T. F. (1997). Steady state structural analysis and interaction characterization for multivariable control systems. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 36, 3718-3726.
47. Ziegler, J. G., & Nichols, N. B. (1943). Process lags in automatic control circuits. Transactions of ASME, 65, 433.