Staging uterine cervical carcinoma with low-field MR imaging

Acta Radiologica

Volumn 41, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 647-652

  Hansen, Marc A ^a   Hjortkjaer Pedersen P ^a   Andreasson, B ^a   Bjerregaard, B ^a   Thomsen, H S ^a  

^a GENTOFTE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Cervical cancers, tumours; MR, low field imaging

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; GADODIAMIDE; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

ADENOCARCINOMA; ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA; UTERINE CERVIX TUMOR;

ADENOCARCINOMA; ADULT; CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 0042189648     PISSN: 02841851     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/028418500127346072     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. COHEN J. A.: Coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ. Psycol. Measurem. 20 (1960), 37.
2. COWLES T. A., MARGINA J. F., MASTERSON B. J. & CAPEN C. V: Comparison of clinical and surgical staging in patients with endometrial carcinoma. Obstet. Gynecol. 66 (1985), 413.
3. ELMORE J. G., WELLS C. K., LEE C. H., HOWARD D. H. & FEINSTEIN A. R.: Variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms. New Engl. J. Med. 331 (1994), 1493.
4. HRICAK H., HAMM B., SEMELKA R. C. et al: Carcinoma of the uterus. Use of gadopentetate dimeglumine in MR imaging. Radiology 181 (1991), 95.
5. HRICAK H., LACEY C. G., SANDLES L. G., CHANG Y. C. F., WINKLER M. L. & STERN J. L.: Invasive cervical carcinoma. Comparison of MR imaging and surgical findings. Radiology 166 (1988), 623.
6. HRICAK H., POWELL C. B., YU K. K. et al.: Invasive cervical carcinoma. Role of MR imaging in pretreatment work-up-cost minimization and diagnostic efficacy analysis. Radiology 198 (1996), 403.
7. KIM S. H., CHOI B. I., HAN J. K. et al.: Preoperative staging of uterine cervical carcinoma. Comparison of CT and MRI in 99 patients. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 17 (1993), 633.
8. KIM S. H., CHOI B. I., LEE H. P. et al.: Uterine cervical carcinoma. Comparison of CT and MR findings. Radiology 175 (1990), 45.
9. LAGASSE L. D., CREASMAN W. T., SHINGLETON H. M., FORD J. H. & BLESSING J. A.: Results and complications of operative staging in cervical cancer. Experience of the Gynecologic Oncology Group. Gynecol. Oncol. 9 (1980), 90.
10. LANDONI F., MANEO A., COLOMBO A. et al.: Randomised study of radical surgery versus radiotherapy for stage Ib-IIa cervical cancer. Lancet 350 (1997), 535.
11. RUBENS D., THORNBURY J. R., ANGEL C. et al.: Stage IB cervical carcinoma. Comparison of clinical, MR, and pathologic staging. AJR 150 (1988), 135.
12. SILVERBERG E. & LUBERA J.: Cancer statistics 1987. CA 36 (1987), 9.
13. SIRONI S., BELLONI C., TACCAGNI G. L. & DEL MASCHIO A.: Carcinoma of the cervix. Value of MR imaging in detecting parametrical involvement. AJR 156 (1991), 753.
14. SIRONI S., DECOBELLI E, SCARFONE G. et al.: Carcinoma of the cervix. Value of plain and gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging in assessing degree of invasiveness. Radiology 188 (1993), 797.
15. SUBAK L. L., HRICAK H., POWELL C. B., AZIZI L. & STERN J. L.: Cervical carcinoma. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative staging. Obstet. Gynecol. 86 (1995), 43.
16. TOGASHI K., NISHIMURA K., SAGOH T. et al.: Carcinoma of the cervix. Staging with MR imaging. Radiology 171 (1989), 245.
17. VAN NAGEL J. R., RODDICK J. W. & LOWIN D. M.: The staging of cervical cancer. Inevitable discrepancies between clinical staging and pathologic findings. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 110 (1971), 973.
18. WIESLANDER S. B., RAPPEPORT E. D., LAUSTEN G. S. & THOMSEN H. S.: Multiplanar reconstruction in MR imaging of the knee. Comparison with sagital and coronal images. Acta Radiol. 39 (1998), 116.