Nonequilibrium, multiple-timescale simulations of ligand-receptor interactions in structured protein systems

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 52, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 339-348

  Zhang, Ying ^a   Peters, Michael H ^a   Li, Yaohang ^b  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Florida State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Brownian dynamics; Molecular dynamics; Nonequilibrium adsorption; Protein docking

Indexed keywords

LIGAND; PROTEIN; RECEPTOR; WATER;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; HYDRODYNAMICS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SIMULATION; VIRUS CAPSID;

ALGORITHMS; BINDING, COMPETITIVE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HIV ENVELOPE PROTEIN GP41; INSULIN; KINETICS; LIGANDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PEPTIDES; PROTEINS; RECEPTORS, CELL SURFACE; TIME FACTORS; WATER;

EID: 0042171862     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.10411     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Duan Y, Kollman PA. Pathways to a protein folding intermediate observed in a 1-microsecond simulation in aqueous solution. Science 1998;282:740-744; Duan Y, Kollman PA. State of the art in studying protein folding and protein structure prediction using molecular dynamics methods. J Mol Graph Model 2001;19:146-149.
2. Duan Y, Kollman PA. Pathways to a protein folding intermediate observed in a 1-microsecond simulation in aqueous solution. Science 1998;282:740-744; Duan Y, Kollman PA. State of the art in studying protein folding and protein structure prediction using molecular dynamics methods. J Mol Graph Model 2001;19:146-149.
3. For some recent equilibrium binding studies on the protein docking problem, see, for example, Gabb HA, Jackson RM, Sternberg MJE. Modeling protein docking using shape complementarity, electrostatics, and biochemical information. J Mol Biol 1997;272:106-120; Morris GM, Goodsell DS, Halliday RS, Huey R, Hart WE, Belew RK, Olson AJ. Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and empirical binding free energy function. J Comput Chem 1998;19:1639-1662; and Camacho CJ, Gatchell DW, Kimura SR, Vajda S. Scoring docked conformations generated by rigid-body protein-protein docking. Proteins 2000;40:525-537.
4. For some recent equilibrium binding studies on the protein docking problem, see, for example, Gabb HA, Jackson RM, Sternberg MJE. Modeling protein docking using shape complementarity, electrostatics, and biochemical information. J Mol Biol 1997;272:106-120; Morris GM, Goodsell DS, Halliday RS, Huey R, Hart WE, Belew RK, Olson AJ. Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and empirical binding free energy function. J Comput Chem 1998;19:1639-1662; and Camacho CJ, Gatchell DW, Kimura SR, Vajda S. Scoring docked conformations generated by rigid-body protein-protein docking. Proteins 2000;40:525-537.
5. For some recent equilibrium binding studies on the protein docking problem, see, for example, Gabb HA, Jackson RM, Sternberg MJE. Modeling protein docking using shape complementarity, electrostatics, and biochemical information. J Mol Biol 1997;272:106-120; Morris GM, Goodsell DS, Halliday RS, Huey R, Hart WE, Belew RK, Olson AJ. Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and empirical binding free energy function. J Comput Chem 1998;19:1639-1662; and Camacho CJ, Gatchell DW, Kimura SR, Vajda S. Scoring docked conformations generated by rigid-body protein-protein docking. Proteins 2000;40:525-537.
6. Peters MH. Fokker-Planck equation and the grand molecular friction tensor for coupled rotational and translational motions of structured Brownian particles near structured surfaces. J Chem Phys 1999;110:528-538.
7. Peters MH. Fokker-Planck equation, molecular friction, and molecular dynamics for Brownian particle transport near external solid surfaces. J Stat Phys 1999;94:557-573.
8. Peters MH. The smoluchowski equation for structured macromolecules near structured surfaces. J Chem Phys 2000;112:5488-5498.
9. Condiff DW, Dahler JS. Brownian motion of polyatomic molecules: the coupling of rotational and translational motions. J Chem Phys 1966;44:3988-4005.
10. Ermak DL, McCammon JA. Brownian dynamics with hydrodynamic interactions. J Chem Phys 1978;69:1352-1360.
11. Goldstein H. Classical mechanics. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1980.
12. Dickinson E, Allison SA, McCammon JA. Brownian dynamics with rotational-translational coupling. J Chem Soc Faraday Trans 2 1985;81:591-601.
13. Peters MH, Ying R. Rotational and translational dynamics of flexible macromolecules. J Chem Phys 1993;98:6492-6503.
14. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gililand G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE. The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res 2000;28:235-242.
15. Berendsen HJC, van der Spoel D, van Drunen R. GROMACS: a message passing parallel molecular dynamics implementation. Comp Phys Comm 1995;91:43-56; Lindahl E, Hess B, van der Spoel D. GROMACS 3.0: a package for molecular simulation and trajectory analysis. J Mol Mod 2001;7:306-317.
16. Berendsen HJC, van der Spoel D, van Drunen R. GROMACS: a message passing parallel molecular dynamics implementation. Comp Phys Comm 1995;91:43-56; Lindahl E, Hess B, van der Spoel D. GROMACS 3.0: a package for molecular simulation and trajectory analysis. J Mol Mod 2001;7:306-317.
17. See Grubmuller H, Heymann B, Tavan P. Ligand binding: molecular mechanics calculation of the streptavidin-biotin rupture force. Science 1996;271:997-1000; and the references cited therein.
18. Toukau K, Rahman A. Molecular dynamics study of atomic motions in water. Phys Rev B 1985;31:2643-2648.
19. Tironi IG, Sperb R, Smith PE, van Gunsteren WW. A generalized reaction field method for molecular dynamics simulations. J Chem Phys 1995;102:5451-5459.
20. Gropp W, Lusk E, Skjellum A. Using MPI. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1999.
21. Sayle R, Milner-White EJ. RASMOL: biomolecular graphics for all. Trends Biochem Sci 1995;20:374.
22. Papoulis A. Random variables and stochastic processes, New York: McGraw-Hill; 1965.
23. Alder BJ, Alley WE. Generalized hydrodynamics. Phys Today 1984;January:56-63.
24. Schmitz R, Felderhof BU. Creeping flow about a sphere. Physica 1978;92A:423-437.
25. In computing the off-diagonal elements of the grand friction tensor for an isolated protein or peptide, we have used the well-known, general symmetric properties of this tensor for an arbitrarily shaped, isolated particle. Specifically, in computing the autocorrelation values for the spherical insulin and D-peptide systems, the (i, j) components and (j, i) components (j, ≠ i) were averaged, leading to the exact symmetrical tensor values shown. See Brenner H. J Coll Interface Sci 1967;23:407; Happel J, Nijhof; Brenner H, Low Reynolds number hydrodynamics. Dordrecht, Netherlands 1983.
26. In computing the off-diagonal elements of the grand friction tensor for an isolated protein or peptide, we have used the well-known, general symmetric properties of this tensor for an arbitrarily shaped, isolated particle. Specifically, in computing the autocorrelation values for the spherical insulin and D-peptide systems, the (i, j) components and (j, i) components (j, ≠ i) were averaged, leading to the exact symmetrical tensor values shown. See Brenner H. J Coll Interface Sci 1967;23:407; Happel J, Nijhof; Brenner H, Low Reynolds number hydrodynamics. Dordrecht, Netherlands 1983.
27. Hoppert M, Mayer F. Prokaryotes. Am Sci 1999;87:518-525.
28. Lamanna R, Delmelle M, Cannistraro S. Solvent Stokes-Einstein violation in aqueous protein solutions. Phys Rev E 1994;49:5878-5880.
29. Eckert D, Nalashkevich V, Hong L, Carr P, Kim P. Inhibiting HIV-1 entry: discovery of D-peptide inhibitors that target gp41 coiled coil pocket. Cell 1999;99:103-115.
30. Wilson E Bright Jr, Decius JC, Cross PC. Molecular vibrations, New York: McGraw-Hill; 1955.