Stroke and aphasia quality of life scale-39 (SAQOL-39): Evaluation of acceptability, reliability, and validity

Stroke

Volumn 34, Issue 8, 2003, Pages 1944-1950

  Hilari, Katerina ^a   Byng, Sally ^b   Lamping, Donna L ^b   Smith, Sarah C ^b  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Aphasia; Outcome; Quality of life; Stroke

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; APHASIA; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; QUALITY OF LIFE; RELIABILITY; SELF REPORT; STROKE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ADULT; AGED; APHASIA; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE; TIME;

EID: 0042122410     PISSN: 00392499     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.0000081987.46660.ED     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bullinger M, Anderson R, Cella D, Aaronson NK. Developing and evaluating cross cultural instruments: from minimum requirements to optimal models. Qual Life Res. 1993;2:451-459.
2. Berzon R, Hays RD, Shumaker SA. International use, application and performance of health-related quality of life instruments. Qual Life Res. 1993;2:367-368.
3. de Haan R, Horn J, Limburg M, Van Der MJ, Bossuyt P. A comparison of five stroke scales with measures of disability, handicap, and quality of life. Stroke. 1993;24:1178-1181.
4. Hays RD, Anderson R, Revicki D. Psychometric considerations in evaluating Health-Related Quality of Life measures. Qual Life Res. 1993;2:441-449.
5. National Clinical Guidelines for Stroke: Prepared by The Intercollegiate Working Party for Stroke. London. UK: Royal College of Physicians; 2000.
6. Duncan PW, Wallace D, Lai S-M, Johnson D, Embretson S, Jacobs Laster L. The Stroke Impact Scale Version 2.0: evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke. 1999;30:2131-2140.
7. Buck D, Jacoby A, Ford G. Reliability and validity of "NEWSQOL": the Newcastle Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Measure. Qual Life Res. 2001; 10:258.
8. van Straten A, de Haan RJ, Limburg M, Schuling J, Bossuyt PM, van den Bos GAM. A stroke-adapted 30-item version of the Sickness Impact Profile to Assess Quality of Life (SA-SIP30). Stroke. 1997;28:2155-2161.
9. Williams LS, Weinberger M, Harris LE, Clark DO, Biller H. Development of a Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale. Stroke. 1999;30:1362-1369.
10. Le Dorze G, Brassard C. A description of the consequences of aphasia on aphasic persons and their relatives and friends, based on the WHO model of chronic diseases. Aphasiology. 1995;9:239-255.
11. Parr S, Byng S, Gilpin S. Talking About Aphasia. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press; 1997.
12. Hilari K, Byng S. Measuring quality of life in people with aphasia: the Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale. Int J Living Commun Disord. 2001;36(suppl):86-91.
13. Hilari, K. Assessing Health Related Quality of Life in People With Aphasia [dissertation]. London. UK: City University; 2002.
14. Enderby P, Wood V, Wade D. Frenchay Aphasia Screening Test. Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson; 1987.
15. Goldberg DP. The Detection of Psychiatric Illness by Questionnaire. London, UK: Oxford University Press; 1972.
16. Raven JC, Court JH, Raven J. Coloured Progressive Matrices. Oxford, UK: Oxford Psychologists Press: 1995.
17. Wade DT, Legh-Smith J, Langton Hewer R. Social activities after stroke: measurement and natural history using the Frenchay Activities Index. Int Rehabil Med. 1985;7:176-181.
18. Sherbourne CD, Stewart AL. The MOS Social Support Survey. Soc Sci Med. 1991;32:705-714.
19. Frattali CM, Thompson CK, Holland AL, Wohl CB, Ferketic MM. Functional Assessment of Communication Skills for Adults. Rockville, Md: American Speech and Hearing Association: 1995.
20. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric Theory, 3rd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1994.
21. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health Measurement Scales. A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1995.
22. Lamping DL, Schroter S, Marquis P, Marrel A, Duprat-Lomon I, Sagnier P-P. The Community-Acquired Pneumonia Symptom questionnaire: a new patient-based outcome measure to evaluate symptoms in patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Chest. 2002;122:920-929.
23. SPSS Base 10.0 Applications Guide. Chicago, Ill: SPSS Inc; 1999.
24. Ferguson E, Cox T. Exploratory factor analysis: a user's guide. Int J Selection Assess. 1993;1:84-94.
25. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using Multivariate Statistics. 4th ed. Boston, Mass: Allyn and Bacon; 2001.
26. Rose D, O'Reilly K. Constructing Classes. Towards a New Social Classification for the UK. Swindon, UK: ESRC/ONS. 1997.
27. Knapp P, Hewison J. Disagreement in patient and carer assessment of functional abilities after stroke. Stroke. 1999;30:938.
28. Sneeuw KCA, Aaronson NK, de Haan RJ, Limburg M. Assessing quality of life after stroke: the value and limitations of proxy ratings. Stroke. 1997;28:1541-1549.
29. Department of Health. Health Survey for England: Cardiovascular Disease. 1998. Available at: www.archive.official-documents.co.uk/ document/doh/survey98/hse-00.html. Accessed May 7, 2002.
30. Stewart JA, Dundas R, Howard RS, Rudd AG, Wolfe CD. Ethnic differences in incidence of stroke: prospective study with stroke register. BMJ. 1999;318:967-971.