메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 105-107

Citations and reference lists: For whom and for what purpose?

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOCUMENTATION; EDITORIAL; MEDICAL LITERATURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; STOCHASTIC MODEL;

EID: 0042090403     PISSN: 09607692     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/uog.197     Document Type: Editorial
Times cited : (5)

References (11)
  • 3
    • 84989591524 scopus 로고
    • Problems of citation analysis: A critical review
    • MacRoberts M, MacRoberts B. Problems of citation analysis: a critical review. J Am Soc Inform Sci 1989; 40: 342-349.
    • (1989) J Am Soc Inform Sci , vol.40 , pp. 342-349
    • MacRoberts, M.1    MacRoberts, B.2
  • 4
    • 19044397759 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • BMJ's impact factor increased by 24%
    • Horgan A. BMJ's impact factor increased by 24%. BMJ 2002; 325: 8.
    • (2002) BMJ , vol.325 , pp. 8
    • Horgan, A.1
  • 5
    • 84989533561 scopus 로고
    • The skewness of science
    • Seglen P. The skewness of science. J Am Soc Inform Sci 1992; 43: 628-638.
    • (1992) J Am Soc Inform Sci , vol.43 , pp. 628-638
    • Seglen, P.1
  • 6
    • 0009232099 scopus 로고
    • The application of bibliometric indicators: Important field- and time-dependent factors to be considered
    • Moed H, Burger W, Frankfort J, Van Raan A. The application of bibliometric indicators: important field- and time-dependent factors to be considered. Scientometrics 1985; 8: 177-203.
    • (1985) Scientometrics , vol.8 , pp. 177-203
    • Moed, H.1    Burger, W.2    Frankfort, J.3    Van Raan, A.4
  • 7
    • 0031049280 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research
    • Seglen P. Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ 1997; 314: 498-502.
    • (1997) BMJ , vol.314 , pp. 498-502
    • Seglen, P.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.