Female Japanese quail affiliate with live males that they have seen mate on video

Animal Behaviour

Volumn 66, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 369-375

  Ophir, Alexander G ^a   Galef Jr , Bennett G ^a  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AFFILIATIVE BEHAVIOR; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; GAMEBIRD; MATING BEHAVIOR;

ANIMALIA; AVES; COTURNIX JAPONICA; JAPONICA; PHASIANIDAE;

EID: 0042069964     PISSN: 00033472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/anbe.2003.2229     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Adret, P. 1997. Discrimination of video images by zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata): direct evidence from song performance. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 111, 115-125.
2. Clark, D. L. & Uetz, G. W. 1990. Video image recognition by the jumping spider, Maevia inclemens (Araneae: Salticidae). Animal Behaviour, 40, 884-890.
3. Clark, D. L. & Uetz, G. W. 1992. Morph-independent mate selection in a dimorphic jumping spider: demonstration of movement bias in female choice using video-controlled courtship behaviour. Animal Behaviour, 43, 247-254.
4. Cuthill, I. C., Hart, N. S., Partridge, J. C., Bennett, A. D. T., Hunt, S. & Church, S. C. 2000. Avian colour vision and avian video playback experiments. Acta Ethologica, 3, 29-37.
5. D'Eath, R. B. 1998. Can video images imitate real stimuli in animal behavior experiments? Biological Reviews, 73, 267-292.
6. D'Eath, R. B. & Dawkins, M. S. 1996. Laying hens do not discriminate between video images of conspecifics. Animal Behaviour, 52, 903-912.
7. Evans, C. S. & Marler, P. 1991. On the use of video images in birds: audience effects on alarm calling. Animal Behaviour, 41, 17-26.
8. Evans, C. S., Macedonia, J. M. & Marler, P. 1993. Effects of apparent size and speed on the response of chickens (Gallus gallus) to computer-generated simulations of aerial predators. Animal Behaviour, 41, 1-11.
9. Fleishman, L. J. & Endler, J. A. 2000. Some comments on visual perception and the use of video playback in animal behaviour studies. Acta Ethologica, 3, 15-27.
10. Fleishman, L. J., McClintock, W. J., D'Eath, R. B., Brainards, D. H. & Endler, J. A. 1998. Colour perception and the use of video playback experiments in animal behaviour. Animal Behaviour, 56, 1035-1040.
11. Galef, B. G., Jr & White, D. J. 1998. Mate-choice copying in Japanese quail, Coturnix coturnix japonica. Animal Behaviour, 55, 545-552.
12. Gibson, R. M. & Höglund, J. 1992. Copying and sexual selection. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 7, 229-232.
13. Hunt, S., Cuthill, I. C., Bennett, A. T. D., Church, S. C. & Partridge, J. C. 2001. Is the ultraviolet waveband a special communication channel in avian mate choice? Journal of Experimental Biology, 204, 2499-2507.
14. Ikebuchi, M. & Okanoya, K. 1999. Male zebra finches and Bengalese finches emit directed songs to the video images of conspecific females projected onto a TFT display. Zoological Science, 16, 63-70.
15. Keeling, L. J. & Hurnik, J. F. 1993. Chickens show socially facilitated feeding behaviour in response to a video image of a conspecific. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 36, 223-231.
16. Kodric-Brown, A. & Nicoletto, P. F. 1997. Repeatability of female choice in the guppy: response to live and videotaped males. Animal Behaviour, 54, 369-376.
17. Landmann, K., Parzefall, J. & Schlupp, I. 1999. A sexual preference in the Amazon molly, Poecilia formosa. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 56, 325-331.
18. Lea, S. E. G. & Dittrich, W. H. 1999. What do birds see in moving video images? Current Psychology of Cognition, 18, 765-803.
19. Lea, S. E. G. & Dittrich, W. H. 2000. What do birds see in moving video images? In: Picture Perception in Animals (Ed. by J. Fagot), pp. 143-180. Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis.
20. Macedonia, J. M. & Stamps, J. A. 1994. Species recognition in Anolis grahami (Sauria, Iguanidae): evidence from responses to video playback of conspecific and heterospecific displays. Ethology, 98, 246-264.
21. McKinnon, J. S. 1995. Video mate preference of female three-spined sticklebacks from populations with divergent male coloration. Animal Behaviour, 50, 1645-1655.
22. McQuoid, L. M. & Galef, B. G., Jr. 1993. Social stimuli influencing feeding behaviour of Burmese red junglefowl: a video analysis. Animal Behaviour, 23, 13-22.
23. Nicoletto, P. F. & Kodric-Brown, A. 1999. The use of digitally-modified videos to study the function of ornamentation and courtship in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 56, 333-341.
24. Ord, T. J. & Evans, C. S. 2002. Interactive video playback and opponent assessment in lizards. Behavioural Processes, 59, 55-65.
25. Ord, T. J., Peters, R. A., Evans, C. S. & Taylor, A. J. 2002. Digital video playback and visual communication in lizards. Animal Behaviour, 63, 879-890.
26. Patterson-Kane, E., Nicol, C. J., Foster, T. M. & Temple, W. 1997. Limited perception of video-images by domestic hens. Animal Behaviour, 53, 951-963.
27. Pepperberg, I. M. 1994. Vocal learning in grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus): effects of social interaction, reference, and context. Auk, 111, 300-313.
28. Pepperberg, I. M., Naughton, J. R. & Banta, P. A. 1998. Allospecific vocal learning by grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus): a failure of videotaped instruction under certain conditions. Behavioural Processes, 42, 139-158.
29. Pope, D. S. 2000. Video playback experiments testing the function of claw waving in the sand fiddler crab. Behaviour, 137, 1349-1360.
30. Premack, D. & Woodruff, G. 1978. Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1, 515-526.
31. Rosenthal, G. G. & Evans, C. S. 1998. Female preference for swords in Xiphophorus helleri reflects a bias for large apparent size. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A., 95, 4431-4436.
32. Rosenthal, G. G., Evens, C. S. & Miller, W. L. 1996. Female preference for dynamic traits in the green sword tail, Xiphophorus helleri. Animal Behaviour, 51, 811-820.
33. Roster, N. O., Clark, D. L. & Gillingham, J. C. 1995. Prey catching behavior in frogs and toads using video-simulated prey. Copeia, 1995, 496-498.
34. Ryan, C. M. E. & Lea, S. E. G. 1994. Images of conspecifics as categories to be discriminated by pigeons and chickens: slides, video tapes, stuffed birds and real birds. Behavioural Processes, 33, 155-176.
35. Uetz, G. W. & Roberts, J. A. 2002. Multisensory cues and multi-modal communication in spiders: insights from video/audio playback studies. Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 59, 222-230.
36. Uetz, G. W. & Smith, E. I. 1999. Asymmetry in a visual signaling character in sexual selection in a wolf spider. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 45, 87-93.
37. White, D. J. & Galef, B. G., Jr. 1999. Mate-choice copying and conspecific cueing in Japanese quail, Coturnix coturnix japonica. Animal Behaviour, 57, 465-473.
38. White, D. J. & Galef, B. G., Jr. 2000. Differences between the sexes in direction and duration of response to seeing a potential sex partner mate with another. Animal Behaviour, 59, 1235-1240.
39. Yamaguchi, A. 1999. Auditory experience does not shape sexual preferences for song in female northern cardinals. Behaviour, 136, 309-329.
40. Zeil, J. 2000. Depth cues, behavioral context, and natural illumination: some potential limitations of video playback techniques. Acta Ethologica, 3, 39-48.