Species evenness, not richness, has a consistent relationship with productivity in old-field vegetation

Community Ecology

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 21-28

  Laird, R A ^a   Pither, J ^a   Aarssen, L W ^a  

^a QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Biomass; Competitive dominance effect; Disturbance; Old field; Productivity; Sampling effect; Species diversity; Species evenness; Species richness

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTION; COMMUNITY ECOLOGY; OLD FIELD; PLANT COMMUNITY; SPECIES EVENNESS; SPECIES RICHNESS;

EID: 0042068329     PISSN: 15858553     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1556/ComEc.4.2003.1.2     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Aarssen, L. W. 1997. High productivity in grassland ecosystems: effected by species diversity or productive species? Oikos 80:183-184.
2. Aarssen, L. W. 2001. On correlations and causations between productivity and species richness in vegetation: predictions from habitat attributes. Basic and Applied Ecology 2:105-114.
3. Aarssen, L. W., R. A. Laird and J. Pither. 2003. Is the productivity of vegetation plots higher or lower when there are more species? Variable predictions from interaction of the 'sampling effect' and 'competitive dominance effect' on the habitat templet. Oikos (in press).
4. Chapin III, F. S., O. E. Sala, I. C. Burke, J. P. Grime, D. H. Hooper, W. K. Lauenroth, A. Lombard, H. A. Mooney, A. R. Mosier, S. Naeem, S. W. Pacala, J. Roy, W. L. Steffan, and D. Tilman. 1998. Ecosystem consequences of changing biodiversity. BioScience 48:45-52.
5. Diamond, J. 1986. Overview: laboratory experiments, field experiment, and natural experiments. In, Diamond, J. and T. J. Case (eds.), Community Ecology. Harper and Row, New York. pp. 3-22.
6. Drobner, U., J. Bibby, B. Smith, and J. B. Wilson. 1998. The relation between community biomass and evenness: what does community theory predict, and can these predictions be tested? Oikos 82:295-302.
7. Emmerson, M. C. and D. G. Raffaelli. 2000. Detecting the effects of diversity on measures of ecosystem function: experimental design, null models and empirical observations. Oikos 91:195-203
8. Epp, G. A. and L. W. Aarssen. 1989. Predicting vegetation patterns from attributes of plant growth in grassland species. Can. J. Bot. 67:2953-2959.
9. Garnier, E., M.-L. Navas, M. P. Austin, J. M. Lilley, and R. M. Gifford. 1997. A problem for biodiversity-productivity studies: how to compare the productivity of multispecific plant mixtures to that of monocultures. Acta Oecologica 18:657-670.
10. Grime, J. P. 1997. Biodiversity and ecosystem function: the debate deepens. Science 277:1260-1261.
11. Grime, J. P. 1998. Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: immediate, filter and founder effects. J. Ecol. 86:902-910.
12. Hector, A. 1998. The effect of diversity on productivity: detecting the role of species complementarity. Oikos 82:597-599.
13. Hector, A., J. Joshi, S.P. Lawler, E.M. Spehn and A. Wilby. 2001. Conservation implications of the link between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Oecologia 129:624-628.
14. Hector, A., B. Schmid, C. Beierkuhnlein, M.C. Caldeira, M. Diemer, P.G. Dimitrakopoulos, J. A. Finn, J. Freitas, P. S. Giller, J. Good, R. Harris, P. Hogberg, K. Huss-Danell, J. Joshi, A. Jumpponen, A Korner, P. W. Leadley, M. Loreau, A. Minns, C. P. H Mulder, G. O'Donovan, S. J. Otway, J. S. Pereira, A. Prinz, D. J. Read, M. Scherer-Lorenzen, E.-D. Schulze, A.-S. D. Siamantziouras, E. M. Spehn, A. C. Terry, A. Y. Troumbis, F. I. Woodward, S. Yachi and J. H. Lawton. 1999. Plant diversity and productivity experiments in European grasslands. Science 286:1123-1127.
15. Hooper, D. U. 1998. The role of complementarity and composition in ecosystem responses to variation in plant diversity. Ecology 79:704-719.
16. Hooper, D. U. and P. M. Vitousek. 1997. The effects of plant composition and diversity on ecosystem processes. Science 277:1302-1305.
17. Huston, M. A. 1997. Hidden treatments in ecological experiments: re-evaluating the ecosystem function of biodiversity. Oecologia 110:449-460.
18. Huston, M. A., L. W. Aarssen, M. P. Austin, B. S. Cade, J. D. Fridley, E. Garnier, J. P. Grime, J. Hodgeson, W. K. Lauenroth, K. Thompson, J. H. Vandermeer and D. Wardle. 2000. No consistent effect of plant diversity on productivity. Science 289:1255.
19. Jolliffe, P. A. 1997. Are mixed populations of plant species more productive than pure stands? Oikos 80:595-602.
20. Kenkel, N. C., D. A. Peltzer, D. Baluta and D. Pirie. 2000. Increasing plant diversity does not influence productivity: empirical evidence and potential mechanisms. Community Ecology 1:165-170.
21. Loreau, M. 1998a. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: A mechanistic model. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (USA) 95:5632-5636.
22. Loreau, M. 1998b. Separating sampling and other effects in biodiversity experiments. Oikos 82:600-602.
23. Loreau, M. 2000. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: recent theoretical advances. Oikos 91:3-17.
24. Loreau, M. and A. Hector. 2001a. Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments. Nature 412:72-76
25. Loreau, M. and A. Hector. 2001b. Erratum: partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments. Nature 413:548.
26. Naeem, S. and S. Li. 1997. Biodiversity enhances ecosystem reliability. Nature 390:507-509.
27. Naeem, S. and S. Li. 1998. A more reliable design for biodiversity study? Nature 394:30.
28. Naeem, S., J. L. Thompson, S. P. Lawler, J. H. Lawton and R. M. Woodfin. 1994. Declining biodiversity can alter the performance of ecosystems. Nature 368:734-737.
29. Naeem, S., K. Hakansson, J. H. Lawton, M. J. Crawley and J. L. Thompson. 1996. Biodiversity and plant productivity in a model assemblage of plant species. Oikos 76:259-264.
30. Naeem, S., F. S. Chapin III, R. Costanza, P. R. Ehrlich, F. B. Golley, D. U. Hooper, J. H. Lawton, R. V. O'Neill, H. A. Mooney, O. E. Sala, A. J. Symstad and D. Tilman. 1999. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: maintaining natural life support processes. Issues in Ecology 4:1-11.
31. Rusch, G. M. and M. Oesterheld. 1997. Relationship between productivity, and species and functional group diversity in grazed and non-grazed Pampas grassland. Oikos 78:519-526
32. Schlapfer, F., B. Schmid and I. Seidl. 1999. Expert estimates about the effects of biodiversity on ecosystem processes and services. Oikos 84:346-352.
33. Schwartz, M. W., C. A. Brigham, J. D. Hoeksema, K. G. Lyons, M. H. Mills and P. J. van Mantgem. 2000. Linking biodiversity to ecosystem function: implications for conservation biology. Oecologia 122:297-305.
34. Smith, B. and J. B. Wilson. 1996. A consumer's guide to evenness indices. Oikos 76:70-82.
35. Špačková, I. and J. Lepš. 2001. Procedure for separating the selection effects in diversity-productivity relationship. Ecology Letters 4:585-594.
36. Tilman, D. 1990. Mechanisms of plant competition for nutrients: the elements of a predictive theory of competition. In: J. B. Grace and D. Tilman (eds.), Perspectives on Plant Competition. Academic Press, San Diego. pp. 117-141.
37. Tilman, D. 1997. Distinguishing between the effects of species diversity and species composition. Oikos 80:185.
38. Tilman, D., D. Wedin and J. Knops. 1996. Productivity and sustainability influenced by biodiversity in grassland ecosystems. Nature 379:718-720.
39. Tilman, D., C. L. Lehman and K. T. Thompson. 1997. Plant diversity and ecosystem productivity: Theoretical considerations. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (USA) 94:1857-1861.
40. Troumbis, A. Y. and D. Memtsas. 2000. Observational evidence that diversity may increase productivity in Mediterranean shrublands. Oecologia 125:101-108.
41. van der Heijden, M. G. A. 1999. "Sampling effect", a problem in biodiversity manipulation? A reply to David A. Wardle. Oikos 87:408-410.
42. Waide, R. B., M. R. Willig, C. F. Steiner, G. Mittelbach, L. Gough, S. I. Dodson, G. P. Juday and R. Parmenter. 1999. The relationship between productivity and species richness. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30:257-300.
43. Walker, B. H. 1992. Biodiversity and ecological redundancy. Cons. Biol. 6:18-23.
44. Wardle, D. A. 1998. A more reliable design for biodiversity study? Nature 394:30.
45. Wardle, D. A. 1999. Is "sampling effect" a problem for experiments investigating biodiversity-ecosystem function relationships? Oikos 87:403-407.
46. Wardle, D. A. 2001. No observational evidence for diversity enhancing productivity in Mediterranean shrublands. Oecologia 129:620-621.
47. Wardle, D. A., K. I. Bonner and K. S. Nicholson. 1997a. Biodiversity and plant litter: experimental evidence which does not support the view that enhanced species richness improves ecosystem function. Oikos 79:247-258.
48. Wardle, D. A., O. Zackrisson, G. Hornberg and C. Gallet. 1997b. The influence of island area on ecosystem properties. Science 277:1296-1299.
49. Wardle, D. A., O. Zackrisson, G. Hornberg and C. Gallet. 1997c. Biodiversity and ecosystem properties. Science 278:1867-1869.
50. Weiher, E. and P. A. Keddy. 1999. Relative abundance and evenness patterns along diversity and biomass gradients. Oikos 87:355-361.
51. Wilsey, B. J. and C. Potvin. 2000. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: importance of species evenness in an old field. Ecology 81:887-892.
52. Wilson, J. B. 1999. Assembly rules in plant communities. In: Weiher, E. and Keddy, P. (eds), Ecological Assembly Rules: Perspectives. Advances, Retreats. Cambridge University Press, pp. 130-164.