The impact of forest management on forest floor vegetation evaluated by species traits

Community Ecology

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 51-62

  Kenderes, K ^a   Standovar T ^a  

^a EÖTVÖS LORÁND UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Fagus sylvatica; Forest naturalness; Forest reserve; Plant functional characteristics

Indexed keywords

COMMUNITY COMPOSITION; FOREST FLOOR; FOREST MANAGEMENT; FUNCTIONAL GROUP; NATURALNESS; PLANT COMMUNITY;

HUNGARY;

FAGUS; FAGUS SYLVATICA;

EID: 0042068320     PISSN: 15858553     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1556/ComEc.4.2003.1.8     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Aude, E. and J.E. Lawesson. 1998. Vegetation in Danish beech forests: the importance of soil, microclimate and management factors, evaluated by variation partitioning. Plant Ecology 134: 53-65.
2. Bachmann, P., M. Köhl and R. Pǐvinen (eds.) 1998. Assessment of Biodiversity for Improved Forest Planning. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
3. Beattie, A.J. and D.C. Culver. 1981. The guild of myrmecochores in the herbaceous flora of West Virginia forests. Ecology 62(1): 107-115.
4. Beattie, A.J. 1983. Distribution of ant-dispersed plants. Sonderbd. Naturwiss. Ver. Hamburg 7: 249-270.
5. Bierzychudek, P. 1982. Life histories and demography of shade-tolerant temperate forest herbs - A review. New Phytologist 90(4): 757-776.
6. Brunet, J., U. Falkengren-Grerup and G. Tyler. 1996. Herb layer vegetation of south Swedish beech and oak forests - Effects of management and soil acidity during one decade. Forest Ecology and Management 88(3): 259-272.
7. Brunet, J., U. Falkengren-Grerup and G. Tyler. 1997. Pattern and dynamics of the ground vegetation in south Swedish Carpinus betulus forests: importance of soil chemistry and management. Ecography 20: 513-520.
8. Crawford, R.M.M. 1989. Studies in Plant Survival: Ecological Case Histories of Plant Adaptation to Adversity. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.
9. Csontos, P. 2000. A magyar flóra ezermagsúly-adatbázisának bemutatása, alkalmazási példákkal. Acta Biol. Debr. Oecol. Hung. 11(1): 51.
10. Csontos, P., J. Tamás and T. Tobisch. 2002. A magyar flóra magterjesztési mód adatbázisának bemutatása, elemzési példákkal: a szociális magatartási tipusok értékelése. In: E. Salamon-Albert (ed.), Magyar botanikai kutatások az ezredfordulón - tanulmányok Borhidi Attila 70. születésnapja tiszteletére. PTE Növénytani Tanszék and MTA Pécsi Akadémiai bizottság, Pécs.
11. Díaz, S., M. Cabido and F. Casanoves. 1998. Plant functional traits and environmental filters at a regional scale. Journal of Vegetation Science 9: 113-122.
12. Duffy, D.C. and A.J. Meier. 1992. Do Appalachian herbaceous understories ever recover from clear cutting? Conservation Biology 6: 196-201.
13. Dzwonko, Z. and S. Loster. 1988. Species richness of small woodlands on the western Carpathian foothills. Vegetatio 76: 15-27.
14. Dzwonko, Z. and S. Loster. 1989. Distribution of vascular plant species in small woodlands on the Western Carpathian foothills. Oikos 56: 77-86.
15. Dzwonko, Z. 1993. Relations between the floristic composition of isolated young woods and their proximity to ancient woodland. Journal of Vegetation Science 4: 693-698.
16. Falinski, J. 1986. Vegetation Dynamics in Temperate Lowland Primeval Forest. Ecological Studies in Bialowieza Forest. (ed. Werger, M. J. A.) Geobotany 8.
17. Foster, S.A. and C.H. Janson. 1985. The relationship between seed size and establishment conditions in tropical woody plants. Ecology 66(3): 773-780.
18. Givnish, T.J. 1982. On the adaptive significance of leaf height in forest herbs. American Naturalist 120(3): 353-381.
19. Graae, B.J. and V.S. Heskjaer. 1997. A comparison of understorey vegetation between untouched and managed deciduous forest in Denmark. Forest Ecology and Management 96(1-2): 111-123.
20. Graae, B.J. and P.B. Sunde. 2000. The impact of forest continuity and management on forest floor vegetation evaluated by species traits. Ecography 23: 720-731.
21. Grime, J.P., J.G. Hodgson and R. Hunt. 1988. Comparative Plant Ecology. A functional approach to common British species. Unwin Hyman Ltd, London.
22. Grime, J.P. et al. 1997. Integrated screening validates primary axes of specialisation in plants. Oikos 79: 259-281.
23. Halpern, C.B. 1988. Early successional pathways and the resistance and resilience of forest communities. Ecology 69(6): 1703-1715.
24. Halpern, C.B. 1989. Early successional patterns of forest species - Interactions of life-history traits and disturbance. Ecology 70(3): 704-720.
25. Hermy, M., O. Honnay, L. Firbank, C. Grashof-Bokdam and J.E. Lawesson. 1999. An ecological comparison between ancient and other forest plant species of Europe, and the implications for forest conservation. Biological Conservation 9: 9-22.
26. Horváth, F., Z. K. Dobolyi, T. Morschhauser, L. Lökös, L. Karas and T. Szerdahelyi (eds.) 1995. FLǑRA adatbázis 1.2: Taxonlista és attribútum-állomány. MTA ÖBKI. Vácrátót.
27. Kirby, K.J. 1990. Changes in the ground flora of a broadleaved wood within a clear fell, group fells and a coppiced block. Forestry 63: 241-249.
28. Klimes, L., J. Klimesova, R. Hendriks and J. van Groenendael. 1997. Clonal plant architectures: a comparative analysis of form and function. In: H. de Kroon and J. van Groenendael (eds.), The Ecology and Evolution of Clonal Plants. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden. pp. 1-29.
29. Kovács, M. 1968. Die acerion pseudoplatani-wälder (Mercuriali-Tilietum und Phyllitidi-Aceretum) des Mátra-Gebirges. Acta Botanica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 14(3-4): 331-350.
30. Kovács, M. 1975. Beziehung zwischen Vegetation und Boden. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest.
31. Lanza, J., M. A. Schmitt and A. B. Awad. 1992. Comparative chemistry of elaiosomes of three species of Trillium. Journal of Chemical Ecology 18: 209-211.
32. Larsson, T.B. et al. 2001. Biodiversity evaluation tools for European forests. Ecological Bulletins 50: 1-237.
33. Leishman, M. R. and M. Westoby. 1992. Classifying plants into groups on the basis of associations of individual traits-evidence from Australian semi-arid woodlands. Journal of Ecology 80: 417-424.
34. Leishman, M.R., M. Westoby and E. Jurado. 1995. Correlates of seed size variation: a comparison among five temperate floras. Journal of Ecology 83: 517-539.
35. Lindacher, R. 1995. Phanart. Datenbank der Gefässpflanzen Mitteleuropas. Veröffentlichungen des geobotanischen Institutes der Eidg. tech. Hochschule, Stiftung Rübel, Zürich 125: 1-436.
36. Matlack, G.R. 1994. Plant Species Migration in a Mixed-History Forest Landscape in Eastern North America. Ecology 75(5): 1491-1502.
37. Matthews, J.D. 1991. Silvicultural Systems. Calderon Press, Oxford.
38. Nault, A. and D. Gagnon. 1993. Ramet demography of Allium tricoccum, a spring ephemeral, perennial forest herb. Journal of Ecology 81(1): 101-119.
39. Newell, S.J. and E.J. Tramer. 1978. Reproductive strategies in herbaceous plant communities during succession. Ecology 59(2): 228-234.
40. Noss, R.F. 1990. Indicators for monitoring biodiversity: a hierarchical approach. Conservation Biology 4(4): 355-364.
41. Pászty, G. 1998. A Kékes Észak erdōrezervátum vegetációtérképe. (Vegetation map of the Kékes Forest Reserve). MSc thesis, ELTE Department of Plant Taxonomy and Ecology, Budapest.
42. Peart, M.H. 1984. The effects of morphology, orientation and position of grass diaspores on seedling survival. Journal of Ecology 72: 437-453.
43. Peterken, G.F. 1996. Natural Woodland. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
44. Peterken, G.F. and M. Game. 1984. Historical factors affecting the number and distribution of vascular plant species in the woodlands of central Lincolnshire. Journal of Ecology 72: 155-182.
45. Regehr, D.L. and F.A. Bazzaz. 1976. Low temperature photosynthesis in successional winter annuals. Ecology 57: 1297-1303.
46. Rothmaler, W. 1988. Exkursionsflora Atlas der Gefässpflanzen. Volk und Wissen Volkseigener Verlag, Berlin.
47. Schmidt, W., K. Kohls and D. Garbitz. 1991. Die untersuchung von Flora und Bodenvegetation in niedersächsischen Naturwäldern-Beispiele aus dem "Meninger Holz" (Lüneburger Heide) und dem "Staufenberg" (Harz). NNA-Ber. 4(2): 138-144.
48. Shipley, B., P.A. Keddy, D.R.J. Moore and K. Lemkt. 1989. Regeneration and establishment strategies of emergent macrophytes. Journal of Ecology 77: 1093-1110.
49. Simberloff, D. 1998. Flagships, umbrellas, and keystones: is single species management passé in the landscape era? Biological Conservation 83(3): 247-257.
50. Simon, T. 1992. A magyarországi edényes flóra határozója: Harasztok-Virágos növények. (Guide to the Vascular Flora of Hungary: Pteridophytes-Flowering Plants). Tankönyvkiadó. Budapest.
51. Soó, R. 1964-1980. A magyar flóra és vegetáció rendszertaninövényföldrajzi kézikönyve I-VI. (Synopsis systematico-geobotanica florae vegetationisque Hungariae I-VI). Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest.
52. Székely, A. 1964. A Mátra természeti földrajza. Földrajzi Közlemények 12(88): 199-218.
53. Thompson, K. and D. Rabinowitz. 1989. Do big plants have big seeds? American Naturalist 133: 722-728.
54. Thompson, K., J.P. Bakker, R.M. Bekker and J.G. Hodgson. 1998. Ecological correlates of seed persistence in soil in the north-west European flora. Journal of Ecology 86: 163-169.
55. UNCED. 1992. Convention on Biological Diversity. Text and annexes. UNEP, Geneva.
56. Venable, D.L. and J.S. Brown. 1988. The selective interactions of dispersal dormancy and seed size as adaptations for reducing risk in variable environments. American Naturalist 131: 360-384.
57. Whitney, G.G. and D.R. Foster. 1988. Overstorey composition and age as determinants of the understorey flora of woods of Central New England. Journal of Ecology 76: 867-876.