Semitransparent volume-rendering CT angiography for lesion display in aortoiliac arteriosclerotic disease

Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology

Volumn 14, Issue 8, 2003, Pages 1023-1030

  Portugaller, Horst R ^a   Schoellnast, Helmut ^a   Tauss, Josef ^a   Tiesenhausen, Kurt ^a   Hausegger, Klaus A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL GRAZ   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOGRAPHY; ARTERIOSCLEROSIS; ARTERY OCCLUSION; ARTICLE; CALCIFICATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HEMODYNAMIC MONITORING; HUMAN; ILIAC ARTERY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEASUREMENT; PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0042068159     PISSN: 10510443     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.RVI.0000082860.05622.F1     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Richter CS, Biamino G, Niemann VT, Ragg C, Felix R. CT angiography and arterial DSA in assessing occlusive processes of the pelvic arteries - first results. Fortschr Roentgenstr 1994; 161:154-160.
2. Wikstrom J, Holmberg A, Johansson L, et al. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography, digital subtraction angiography and duplex of the iliac arteries compared with intra-arterial pressure gradient measurements. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2000; 19:516-523.
3. Kalender WA, Seissler W, Klotz E, Vock P. Spiral volumetric CT with single breath-hold technique, continuous transport and continuous scanner rotation. Radiology 1990; 176:181-190.
4. Sugahara T, Korogi Y, Hirai T, et al. CT angiography in vascular intervention for steno-occlusive diseases: role of multiplanar reconstruction and source images. Br J Radiol 1998; 71:601-611.
5. Standards of practice committee of the Society of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology. Angioplasty standard of practice. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1992; 3:269-271.
6. Rubin GD, Dake MD, Napel S, et al. Spiral CT of renal artery stenosis: comparison of three-dimensional rendering techniques. Radiology 1994; 190:181-189.
7. Tins B, Oxtoby J, Patel S. Comparison of CT angiography with conventional artery angiography in aortoiliac occlusive disease. Br J Radiol 2001; 74:219-225.
8. Rieker O, Mildenberger P, Neufang A, Zitzewitz H, Schweden F, Thelen M. CT angiography for peripheral occlusive vascular disease: comparison of 3 rendering techniques. Fortschr Roentgenstr 1997; 167:361-370.
9. Luboldt W, Weber R, Seemann M, Desantis M, Reiser M. Influence of helical CT parameters on spatial resolution in CT angiography performed with a subsecond scanner. Invest Radiol 1999; 34:421-426.
10. Rubin GD, Shiau MC, Leung AN, Kee ST, Logan LJ, Sofilos MC. Aorta and iliac arteries: single versus multiple detector-row helical CT angiography. Radiology 2000; 215:670-676
11. Ney D, Fishman EK, Magid D, Drebin RA. Volumetric rendering of computed tomography data: principles and techniques. IEEE Comp Graph Appl 1990; 10:19-27.
12. Kuszyk BS, Heath DG, Ney DR, et al. CT angiography with volume rendering: Imaging findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 165:445-448.
13. Schwartz RB, Jones KM, Chernoff DM, et al. Common carotid artery bifurcation: evaluation with spiral CT. Radiology 1992; 185:513-519.
14. Scutta B, Fuerst G, Eilers J, Ferbert A, Kuhn FP. Intracranial stenoocclusive disease: Double-detector helical CT angiography versus digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999; 20:791-799.
15. Zeman RK, Bermann PM, Silverman PM, et al. Diagnosis of aortic dissection: value of helical CT with multiplanar reformation and three-dimensional rendering. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 164:1375-1380.
16. Rieker O, Duber C, Neufang A, Pitton M, Schweden F, Thelen M. CT arteriography versus intraarterial digital subtraction angiography for assessment of aortoiliac occlusive disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 169:1133-1138.
17. Raptopoulos V, Rosen MP, Kent KC, Kuestner LM, Sheiman RG, Pearlman JD. Sequential helical CT angiography of aortoiliac disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 166:1347-1354.
18. Kuszyk BS, Heath DG, Johnson PT, Eng J, Fishman EK. CT angiography with volume rendering for quantifying vascular stenoses: in vitro validation of accuracy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 173:449-455.
19. Woodcock RJ, Goldstein JH, Kallmes DF, Cloft HJ, Phillips CD. Angiograohic correlation of CT calcification in the carotid siphon. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999; 20:495-499.
20. Lundin P, Svensson A, Henriksen E, et al. Imaging of aortoiliac arterial disease: duplex ultrasound and MR angiography versus digital subtraction angiography. Acta Radiol 2000; 41:125-132
21. Grant EG. Duplex ultrasonography: ist expanding role in noninvasive vascular diagnosis. Radiol Clin North Am 1985; 23:563-582.
22. Poon E, Yucel EK, Pagan-Marin H, Kayne H. Iliac artery stenosis measurement: Comparison of two-dimensional time-of-flight and three-dimensional dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 169:1139-1144.
23. Bush HP, Hoffmann HG, Metzner C, Oettinger W. MR-angiography of the lower extremities with automatic moving bed ("MobiTrak") in comparison to i.a. DSA. Fortschr Roentgenstr 1999; 70:275-283.