Spotlighting women scientists in the press: Tokenism in science journalism

Public Understanding of Science

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 347-358

  Shachar, Orly ^a  

^a IONA COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042027107     PISSN: 09636625     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0963-6625/9/4/301     Document Type: Article

References (90)

1. June Goodfield, Reflections on Science and the Media (Washington, D.C.: American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1981); Sharon M. Friedman, Sharon Dunwoody, and Carol L. Rogers, Scientists and Journalists: Reporting Science as News (New York: The Free Press, 1986); John C. Burnham, How Superstition Won and Science Lost: Popularizing Science and Health in the U.S (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1987); Dorothy Nelkin, Selling Science: How the Press Covers Science and Technology (New York: W. H. Freeman, 1987); Gary Taubes, Bad Science: The Short Life and Weird Times of Cold Fusion (New York: Random House, 1993); Ted Anton and Rick McCourt, eds., The New Science Journalists (New York: Ballantine Books, 1995); Jim Hartz and Rick Chappell, Worlds Apart: How the Distance between Science and Journalism Threatens America's Future (Nashville: First Amendment Center, 1997).
2. June Goodfield, Reflections on Science and the Media (Washington, D.C.: American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1981); Sharon M. Friedman, Sharon Dunwoody, and Carol L. Rogers, Scientists and Journalists: Reporting Science as News (New York: The Free Press, 1986); John C. Burnham, How Superstition Won and Science Lost: Popularizing Science and Health in the U.S (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1987); Dorothy Nelkin, Selling Science: How the Press Covers Science and Technology (New York: W. H. Freeman, 1987); Gary Taubes, Bad Science: The Short Life and Weird Times of Cold Fusion (New York: Random House, 1993); Ted Anton and Rick McCourt, eds., The New Science Journalists (New York: Ballantine Books, 1995); Jim Hartz and Rick Chappell, Worlds Apart: How the Distance between Science and Journalism Threatens America's Future (Nashville: First Amendment Center, 1997).
3. June Goodfield, Reflections on Science and the Media (Washington, D.C.: American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1981); Sharon M. Friedman, Sharon Dunwoody, and Carol L. Rogers, Scientists and Journalists: Reporting Science as News (New York: The Free Press, 1986); John C. Burnham, How Superstition Won and Science Lost: Popularizing Science and Health in the U.S (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1987); Dorothy Nelkin, Selling Science: How the Press Covers Science and Technology (New York: W. H. Freeman, 1987); Gary Taubes, Bad Science: The Short Life and Weird Times of Cold Fusion (New York: Random House, 1993); Ted Anton and Rick McCourt, eds., The New Science Journalists (New York: Ballantine Books, 1995); Jim Hartz and Rick Chappell, Worlds Apart: How the Distance between Science and Journalism Threatens America's Future (Nashville: First Amendment Center, 1997).
4. June Goodfield, Reflections on Science and the Media (Washington, D.C.: American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1981); Sharon M. Friedman, Sharon Dunwoody, and Carol L. Rogers, Scientists and Journalists: Reporting Science as News (New York: The Free Press, 1986); John C. Burnham, How Superstition Won and Science Lost: Popularizing Science and Health in the U.S (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1987); Dorothy Nelkin, Selling Science: How the Press Covers Science and Technology (New York: W. H. Freeman, 1987); Gary Taubes, Bad Science: The Short Life and Weird Times of Cold Fusion (New York: Random House, 1993); Ted Anton and Rick McCourt, eds., The New Science Journalists (New York: Ballantine Books, 1995); Jim Hartz and Rick Chappell, Worlds Apart: How the Distance between Science and Journalism Threatens America's Future (Nashville: First Amendment Center, 1997).
5. June Goodfield, Reflections on Science and the Media (Washington, D.C.: American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1981); Sharon M. Friedman, Sharon Dunwoody, and Carol L. Rogers, Scientists and Journalists: Reporting Science as News (New York: The Free Press, 1986); John C. Burnham, How Superstition Won and Science Lost: Popularizing Science and Health in the U.S (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1987); Dorothy Nelkin, Selling Science: How the Press Covers Science and Technology (New York: W. H. Freeman, 1987); Gary Taubes, Bad Science: The Short Life and Weird Times of Cold Fusion (New York: Random House, 1993); Ted Anton and Rick McCourt, eds., The New Science Journalists (New York: Ballantine Books, 1995); Jim Hartz and Rick Chappell, Worlds Apart: How the Distance between Science and Journalism Threatens America's Future (Nashville: First Amendment Center, 1997).
6. June Goodfield, Reflections on Science and the Media (Washington, D.C.: American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1981); Sharon M. Friedman, Sharon Dunwoody, and Carol L. Rogers, Scientists and Journalists: Reporting Science as News (New York: The Free Press, 1986); John C. Burnham, How Superstition Won and Science Lost: Popularizing Science and Health in the U.S (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1987); Dorothy Nelkin, Selling Science: How the Press Covers Science and Technology (New York: W. H. Freeman, 1987); Gary Taubes, Bad Science: The Short Life and Weird Times of Cold Fusion (New York: Random House, 1993); Ted Anton and Rick McCourt, eds., The New Science Journalists (New York: Ballantine Books, 1995); Jim Hartz and Rick Chappell, Worlds Apart: How the Distance between Science and Journalism Threatens America's Future (Nashville: First Amendment Center, 1997).
7. June Goodfield, Reflections on Science and the Media (Washington, D.C.: American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1981); Sharon M. Friedman, Sharon Dunwoody, and Carol L. Rogers, Scientists and Journalists: Reporting Science as News (New York: The Free Press, 1986); John C. Burnham, How Superstition Won and Science Lost: Popularizing Science and Health in the U.S (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1987); Dorothy Nelkin, Selling Science: How the Press Covers Science and Technology (New York: W. H. Freeman, 1987); Gary Taubes, Bad Science: The Short Life and Weird Times of Cold Fusion (New York: Random House, 1993); Ted Anton and Rick McCourt, eds., The New Science Journalists (New York: Ballantine Books, 1995); Jim Hartz and Rick Chappell, Worlds Apart: How the Distance between Science and Journalism Threatens America's Future (Nashville: First Amendment Center, 1997).
8. Vikki Entwistle, "Reporting research in medical journals and newspapers," British Medical Journal 310, no. 6984 (1995): 920-924; Dorothy Nelkin, "Science's fall from grace," The Humanist 55, no. 5 (1995): 14-20; Tom Wilkie, "Sources in science: whom can we trust?" The Lancet 347, no. 9011 (1996): 1308-1312; Vincent Kiernan, "Ingelfinger, embargoes, and other controls on the dissemination of science news," Science Communication 18, no. 4 (1997): 297-319.
9. Vikki Entwistle, "Reporting research in medical journals and newspapers," British Medical Journal 310, no. 6984 (1995): 920-924; Dorothy Nelkin, "Science's fall from grace," The Humanist 55, no. 5 (1995): 14-20; Tom Wilkie, "Sources in science: whom can we trust?" The Lancet 347, no. 9011 (1996): 1308-1312; Vincent Kiernan, "Ingelfinger, embargoes, and other controls on the dissemination of science news," Science Communication 18, no. 4 (1997): 297-319.
10. Vikki Entwistle, "Reporting research in medical journals and newspapers," British Medical Journal 310, no. 6984 (1995): 920-924; Dorothy Nelkin, "Science's fall from grace," The Humanist 55, no. 5 (1995): 14-20; Tom Wilkie, "Sources in science: whom can we trust?" The Lancet 347, no. 9011 (1996): 1308-1312; Vincent Kiernan, "Ingelfinger, embargoes, and other controls on the dissemination of science news," Science Communication 18, no. 4 (1997): 297-319.
11. Vikki Entwistle, "Reporting research in medical journals and newspapers," British Medical Journal 310, no. 6984 (1995): 920-924; Dorothy Nelkin, "Science's fall from grace," The Humanist 55, no. 5 (1995): 14-20; Tom Wilkie, "Sources in science: whom can we trust?" The Lancet 347, no. 9011 (1996): 1308-1312; Vincent Kiernan, "Ingelfinger, embargoes, and other controls on the dissemination of science news," Science Communication 18, no. 4 (1997): 297-319.
12. Lana Rakow, "Gendered technology, gendered practice," Critical Studies in Mass Communication 5 (1988): 57-70; Leah A. Lievrouw, "Communication and the social representation of scientific knowledge," Critical Studies in Mass Communication 1 (1990): 1-10; Gill Kirkup, Inventing Women: Science Technology and Gender (Cambridge, U.K.: Polity Press, 1992); David Stone, "Omni meets Feynman: the interaction between popular and scientific cultures," in The Literature of Science: Perspectives on Popular Scientific Writing, eds. McRae and Murdo (Athens and London: University of Georgia Press, 1993); Alan Irvwin and Brian Wynne, eds., Misunderstanding Science?: The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology (Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 1996).
13. Lana Rakow, "Gendered technology, gendered practice," Critical Studies in Mass Communication 5 (1988): 57-70; Leah A. Lievrouw, "Communication and the social representation of scientific knowledge," Critical Studies in Mass Communication 1 (1990): 1-10; Gill Kirkup, Inventing Women: Science Technology and Gender (Cambridge, U.K.: Polity Press, 1992); David Stone, "Omni meets Feynman: the interaction between popular and scientific cultures," in The Literature of Science: Perspectives on Popular Scientific Writing, eds. McRae and Murdo (Athens and London: University of Georgia Press, 1993); Alan Irvwin and Brian Wynne, eds., Misunderstanding Science?: The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology (Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 1996).
14. Lana Rakow, "Gendered technology, gendered practice," Critical Studies in Mass Communication 5 (1988): 57-70; Leah A. Lievrouw, "Communication and the social representation of scientific knowledge," Critical Studies in Mass Communication 1 (1990): 1-10; Gill Kirkup, Inventing Women: Science Technology and Gender (Cambridge, U.K.: Polity Press, 1992); David Stone, "Omni meets Feynman: the interaction between popular and scientific cultures," in The Literature of Science: Perspectives on Popular Scientific Writing, eds. McRae and Murdo (Athens and London: University of Georgia Press, 1993); Alan Irvwin and Brian Wynne, eds., Misunderstanding Science?: The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology (Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 1996).
15. Lana Rakow, "Gendered technology, gendered practice," Critical Studies in Mass Communication 5 (1988): 57-70; Leah A. Lievrouw, "Communication and the social representation of scientific knowledge," Critical Studies in Mass Communication 1 (1990): 1-10; Gill Kirkup, Inventing Women: Science Technology and Gender (Cambridge, U.K.: Polity Press, 1992); David Stone, "Omni meets Feynman: the interaction between popular and scientific cultures," in The Literature of Science: Perspectives on Popular Scientific Writing, eds. McRae and Murdo (Athens and London: University of Georgia Press, 1993); Alan Irvwin and Brian Wynne, eds., Misunderstanding Science?: The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology (Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 1996).
16. Lana Rakow, "Gendered technology, gendered practice," Critical Studies in Mass Communication 5 (1988): 57-70; Leah A. Lievrouw, "Communication and the social representation of scientific knowledge," Critical Studies in Mass Communication 1 (1990): 1-10; Gill Kirkup, Inventing Women: Science Technology and Gender (Cambridge, U.K.: Polity Press, 1992); David Stone, "Omni meets Feynman: the interaction between popular and scientific cultures," in The Literature of Science: Perspectives on Popular Scientific Writing, eds. McRae and Murdo (Athens and London: University of Georgia Press, 1993); Alan Irvwin and Brian Wynne, eds., Misunderstanding Science?: The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology (Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 1996).
17. Dorothy Nelkin, "An uneasy relationship; the tension between medicine and the media," The Lancet 347, no. 9015 (1996): 1600-1604; Sandra Blakeslee, "Reporting on neuroscience," The Quill 85, no. 4 (1997): 35-39; Vincent Kiernan, "Ingelfinger, embargoes, and other controls on the dissemination of science news"; Larry Witham, "Scientists to journalists: don't use the 'B' word," Insight on the News 13, no. 41 (1997): 38.
18. Dorothy Nelkin, "An uneasy relationship; the tension between medicine and the media," The Lancet 347, no. 9015 (1996): 1600-1604; Sandra Blakeslee, "Reporting on neuroscience," The Quill 85, no. 4 (1997): 35-39; Vincent Kiernan, "Ingelfinger, embargoes, and other controls on the dissemination of science news"; Larry Witham, "Scientists to journalists: don't use the 'B' word," Insight on the News 13, no. 41 (1997): 38.
19. Dorothy Nelkin, "An uneasy relationship; the tension between medicine and the media," The Lancet 347, no. 9015 (1996): 1600-1604; Sandra Blakeslee, "Reporting on neuroscience," The Quill 85, no. 4 (1997): 35-39; Vincent Kiernan, "Ingelfinger, embargoes, and other controls on the dissemination of science news"; Larry Witham, "Scientists to journalists: don't use the 'B' word," Insight on the News 13, no. 41 (1997): 38.
20. Dorothy Nelkin, "An uneasy relationship; the tension between medicine and the media," The Lancet 347, no. 9015 (1996): 1600-1604; Sandra Blakeslee, "Reporting on neuroscience," The Quill 85, no. 4 (1997): 35-39; Vincent Kiernan, "Ingelfinger, embargoes, and other controls on the dissemination of science news"; Larry Witham, "Scientists to journalists: don't use the 'B' word," Insight on the News 13, no. 41 (1997): 38.
21. Catherine A. Collins and Susan R. Kephart, "Science as news: the emergence and framing of biodiversity," Mass Comm Review 22, no. 1 & 2 (1995): 21-45; Timothy Ferris, "The risks and rewards of popularizing science," The Chronicle of Higher Education, 4 April 1997, B6.
22. Catherine A. Collins and Susan R. Kephart, "Science as news: the emergence and framing of biodiversity," Mass Comm Review 22, no. 1 & 2 (1995): 21-45; Timothy Ferris, "The risks and rewards of popularizing science," The Chronicle of Higher Education, 4 April 1997, B6.
23. John C. Burnham, How Superstition Won and Science Lost: Popularizing Science and Health in the U.S. (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1987), 258.
24. Jim Hartz and Rick Chappell, Worlds Apart: How the Distance between Science and Journalism Threatens America's Future (Nashville: First Amendment Center, 1997), 57.
25. David H. Frankel, "Fatal attraction between scientists and journalists?" The Lancet 345 (1995): 1105-1106.
26. John C. Burnham, How Superstition Won and Science Lost, p. 200.
27. David H. Frankel, "Fatal Attraction," p. 1106.
28. Ted Anton and Rick McCourt, eds., The New Science Journalists, p. 11.
29. Lievrouw, "Communication and the social representation of scientific knowledge," Critical Studies in Mass Communication 1 (1990): 1-10.
30. Dorothy Nelkin, Selling Science: How the Press Covers Science and Technology (New York: W. H. Freeman, 1987), 18-19.
31. Marcel C. LaFollette, "Eyes on the stars: images of women scientists in popular magazines," Science, Technology, & Human Values 13, no. 3 & 4 (1988): 272.
32. Marcel C. LaFollette, Making Science Our Own: Public Images of Science 1910-1955 (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1990), 92.
33. Jocelyn Steinke and Marilee Long, "A lab of her own? portrayals of female characters on children's educational science programs," Science Communication 18, no. 2 (1996): 91-116.
34. Lynne C. McArthur, "Report: the portrayal of women in science books for junior readers," Science Communication 20, no. 2 (1998): 247-263.
35. Jocelyn Steinke, "A portrait of a woman as a scientist: breaking down barriers created by gender-role stereotypes," Public Understanding of Science 6 (1997): 424.
36. Jocelyn Steinke, "Connecting theory and practice: women scientist role models in television," Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 42, no. 1 (1998): 142-151.
37. Sharon M. Friedman, Sharon Dunwoody, and Carol L. Rogers, Scientists and Journalists: Reporting Science as News (New York: The Free Press, 1986).
38. June Goodfield, Reflections on Science and the Media (Washington, D.C.: American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1981).
39. Junior Bridge, "The media mirror: reading between the (news) lines," The Quill 82 (1994): 18-19.
40. Junior Bridge, "The Media Mirror," p. 18.
41. George Gerbner, "Violence in television drama: trends and symbolic functions," in Television and Social Behavior, eds. George Comstock, Eli Rubinstein, and John Murro (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1972).
42. Susan H. Miller, "The content of news photos: women's and men's roles," Journalism Quarterly 52, no. 1 (1975): 70-75.
43. Marcia Bartusiak, "Through the media, darkly," Sky and Telescope 87 (1994): 6.
44. National Science Board, Science & Engineering Indicators - 1998 (National Science Foundation, 1998).
45. Lynn Zimmer, "Tokenism and women in the workplace: the limits of gender neutral theory," Social Problems 35 (1988): 64-77; Judith Long Laws, "The psychology of tokenism: an analysis," Sex Roles 1 (1975): 51-67; Everett Hughes, "Dilemmas and contradictions of status," American Journal of Sociology 50 (1945): 353-359; Lynn Zimmer, "Tokenism and women in the Workplace," p. 65.
46. Lynn Zimmer, "Tokenism and women in the workplace: the limits of gender neutral theory," Social Problems 35 (1988): 64-77; Judith Long Laws, "The psychology of tokenism: an analysis," Sex Roles 1 (1975): 51-67; Everett Hughes, "Dilemmas and contradictions of status," American Journal of Sociology 50 (1945): 353-359; Lynn Zimmer, "Tokenism and women in the Workplace," p. 65.
47. Lynn Zimmer, "Tokenism and women in the workplace: the limits of gender neutral theory," Social Problems 35 (1988): 64-77; Judith Long Laws, "The psychology of tokenism: an analysis," Sex Roles 1 (1975): 51-67; Everett Hughes, "Dilemmas and contradictions of status," American Journal of Sociology 50 (1945): 353-359; Lynn Zimmer, "Tokenism and women in the Workplace," p. 65.
48. Lynn Zimmer, "Tokenism and women in the workplace: the limits of gender neutral theory," Social Problems 35 (1988): 64-77; Judith Long Laws, "The psychology of tokenism: an analysis," Sex Roles 1 (1975): 51-67; Everett Hughes, "Dilemmas and contradictions of status," American Journal of Sociology 50 (1945): 353-359; Lynn Zimmer, "Tokenism and women in the Workplace," p. 65.
49. Rosabeth Moss Kanter, Men and Women of the Corporation (New York: Basic Books, 1977).
50. Bernard Segal, "Male nurses, a study in status contradictions and prestige loss," Social Forces 41 (1962): 31-48; Eve Spangler, Marsha Gordon, and Ronald Pipkin, "Token women: an empirical test of Kanter's hypothesis," American Journal of Sociology 84 (1978): 160-170; Liliane Floge and Deborah Merril, "Tokenism reconsidered: male nurses and female physicians in a hospital setting," Social Forces 64 (1985): 925-947.
51. Bernard Segal, "Male nurses, a study in status contradictions and prestige loss," Social Forces 41 (1962): 31-48; Eve Spangler, Marsha Gordon, and Ronald Pipkin, "Token women: an empirical test of Kanter's hypothesis," American Journal of Sociology 84 (1978): 160-170; Liliane Floge and Deborah Merril, "Tokenism reconsidered: male nurses and female physicians in a hospital setting," Social Forces 64 (1985): 925-947.
52. Bernard Segal, "Male nurses, a study in status contradictions and prestige loss," Social Forces 41 (1962): 31-48; Eve Spangler, Marsha Gordon, and Ronald Pipkin, "Token women: an empirical test of Kanter's hypothesis," American Journal of Sociology 84 (1978): 160-170; Liliane Floge and Deborah Merril, "Tokenism reconsidered: male nurses and female physicians in a hospital setting," Social Forces 64 (1985): 925-947.
53. Janice D. Yoder and Patricia Aniakudo, "'Outsider within' the firehouse: subordination and difference in the social interactions of African women firefighters," Gender & Society 11 (1997): 324-341;
54. Janice D. Yoder, Patricia Aniakudo, and Lynne Berendsen, "Looking beyond gender: the effects of racial differences of tokenism perceptions of women," Sex Roles (1996): 389-401.
55. Dana L. Cloud, "Hegemony or concordance? the rhetoric of tokenism in 'Oprah' Winfrey's rags-to-riches biography," Critical Studies in Mass Communication 13 (1996): 115-137.
56. Dana L. Cloud, "Hegemony or Concordance?" p. 124.
57. H. Leslie Steeves, "Feminist theories and media studies," Critical Studies in Mass Communication 4 (1987): 121.
58. Rosalind Gill, "Ideology, gender and popular radio: a discourse analytic approach," in Turning It On, eds. Helen Baehr and Ann Gray (London: Arnold, 1996), 211-217.
59. Hemant Shah, "News and self-production of society," Journalism Monographs 144 (1994): 1-31;
60. Tamar Liebes and Sonia Livingstone, "The structure of family and romantic ties in the soap opera: an ethnographic approach," Communication Research 21, no. 6 (1994): 717-741.
61. Tamar Liebes and Sonia Livingstone, "The Structure of Family and Romantic Ties," p. 738.
62. Susanna Horing, "Television's NOVA and the construction of scientific truth," Critical Studies in Mass Communication 7 (1990): 11-23.
63. Jane Banks and Jonathan David Tankel, "Science as fiction: technology in prime time television," Critical Studies in Mass Communication 7 (1990): 24-36; Elfriede Fursich and E. P. Lester, "Science journalism under scrutiny: a textual analysis of 'Science Times,"' Critical Studies of Mass Communication (1996): 24-43.
64. Jane Banks and Jonathan David Tankel, "Science as fiction: technology in prime time television," Critical Studies in Mass Communication 7 (1990): 24-36; Elfriede Fursich and E. P. Lester, "Science journalism under scrutiny: a textual analysis of 'Science Times,"' Critical Studies of Mass Communication (1996): 24-43.
65. Fursich and Lester, "Science journalism."
66. Natalie Angier, "Scientist at work: Shirley M. Tilghman: fighting and studying battle of the sexes with men and mice," The New York Times, 11 June 1996, C1.
67. Angier, "Scientists at work."
68. Angier, "Scientists at work."
69. Marcel C. LaFollette, "Eyes on the stars," pp. 262-275.
70. Gail Tuchman, "Women's depiction by the mass media," Signs 3 (1979): 528-542.
71. Ros Ballaster, M. Beetham, E. Frazer, and S. Hebron, Women's Worlds: Ideology, Femininity and the Women's Magazines (Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Macmillan, 1991).
72. Robert K. J. Killheffer, "Discovering women," Omni 17, no. 17 (1995): 27.
73. Gina Kolata, "Scientist at work: Steven Block: molecular biomechanic is tweaking nature's tiniest motors," The New York Times 26 March 1996, C1.
74. Angier, "Scientists at work."
75. Rosalind Gill, "Ideology, gender and popular radio."
76. Gill, "Ideology, gender and popular radio."
77. Lisbeth Lipari, "Journalistic authority: textual strategies of legitimization," Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 73, no. 4 (1996): 821-834; Lipari, "Journalistic authority," p. 823.
78. Lisbeth Lipari, "Journalistic authority: textual strategies of legitimization," Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 73, no. 4 (1996): 821-834; Lipari, "Journalistic authority," p. 823.
79. Barbie Zelizer, "Achieving journalistic authority through narrative," Critical Studies in Mass Communication 7 (1990): 366-376; Zelizer, "Achieving journalistic authority," p. 366.
80. Barbie Zelizer, "Achieving journalistic authority through narrative," Critical Studies in Mass Communication 7 (1990): 366-376; Zelizer, "Achieving journalistic authority," p. 366.
81. Glasgow Media Group, More Bad News (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1980).
82. Jurgen Habermas, Communication and the Evolution of Society (Boston: Beacon Press, 1979).
83. Anne Raver, "Scientist at work: Temple Grandin: qualities of an animal scientist: cow's eye view and autism," The New York Times, 5 August 1997, C1.
84. Roberta J. Astroff and Amy Kiste Nyberg, "Discursive hierarchies and the construction of crisis in the news: a case study," Discourse & Society 3, no. 1 (1992): 5-23.
85. William Broad, "Scientist at work: Joseph Rotblat: still battling nuclear weapons 50 years after Manhattan Project," The New York Times, 21 May 1996, C1.
86. Elfriede Fursich and E. P. Lester, "Science journalism under scrutiny."
87. John N. Wilford, "Scientist at work: Anna C. Roosevelt: sharp and to the point in Amazonia," The New York Times, 23 April 1997, C1.
88. Brenda Fowler, "Scientist at work: Paul C. Sereno: imp's evolution to fossil finder," The New York Times, 4 June 1996, C1.
89. Denise Grady, "Scientist at work: P. Kirk Visscher: a life spent among bees deciphering the swarm," The New York Times, 1 April 1997, C1.
90. Walter S. Ross, The Last Hero: Charles A. Lindbergh (New York: Harper & Row, 1968): XIII.