Niche shifts and expansion due to sexual selection

Evolutionary Ecology Research

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 351-369

  Proulx, Stephen R ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

Evolution; Mating systems; Niche breadth; Sexual selection

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042025940     PISSN: 15220613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Aars, J. and Ims, R.A. 2000. Population dynamic and genetic consequences of spatial density-dependent dispersal in patchy populations. Am. Nat., 155: 252-265.
2. Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3. Borgia, G. 1979. Sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. In Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects, pp. 19-50. New York: Academic Press.
4. Brown, J.S. and Pavlovic, N.B. 1992. Evolution in heterogeneous environments: effects of migration on habitat specialization. Evol. Ecol., 6: 360-382.
5. Clark, D.C., DeBano, S.J. and Moor, A.J. 1997. The influence of environmental quality on sexual selection in Nauphoeta cinerea (Dictyoptera: Blaberidae). Behav. Ecol., 8: 46-53.
6. Dias, P.C. and Blondel, J. 1996. Local specialization and maladaptation in the mediterranean blue tit (Parus caeruleus). Oecologia, 107: 79-96.
7. Gomulkiewicz, R., Holt, R.D. and Barfield, M. 1990. The effects of density dependence and immigration on local adaptation and niche evolution in a black-hole sink environment. Theor. Pop. Biol., 55: 283-296.
8. Grafen, A. 1990. Biological signals as handicaps. J. Theor. Biol., 144: 517-546.
9. Hamilton, W.D. and Zuk, M. 1982. Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites? Science, 218: 384-387.
10. Holt, R.D. 1996a. Adaptive evolution in source-sink environments: direct and indirect effects of density-dependence on niche evolution. Oikos, 75: 182-192.
11. Holt, R.D. 1996b. Demographic constraints in evolution: towards unifying the evolutionary theories on senescence and niche conservatism. Evol. Ecol., 10: 1-11.
12. Holt, R.D. 1997. On the evolutionary stability of sink populations. Evol. Ecol., 11: 723-731.
13. Holt, R.D. and Gaines, M.S. 1992. Analysis of adaptation in heterogeneous landscapes: implications for the evolution of fundamental niches. Evol. Ecol., 6: 433-447.
14. Iwasa, Y., Pomiankowski, A. and Nee, S. 1991. The evolution of costly mate preferences. II. The 'handicap' principle. Evolution, 45: 1431-1442.
15. Janetos, A.C. 1980. Stratagies of female mate choice: a theoretical analysis. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 7: 107-112.
16. Kawecki, T.J. 1995. Demography of source-sink populations and the evolution of ecological niches. Evol. Eco/., 9:38-44.
17. Kawecki, T.J. 2000. Adaptation to marginal habitats: contrasting influence of the dispersal rate on the fate of alleles with small and large effects. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 267: 1315-1320.
18. Kawecki, T.J., Barton, N.H. and Fry, J.D. 1997. Mutational collapse of fitness in marginal habitats and the evolution of ecological specialisation. J. Evol. Biol., 10: 407-430.
19. Kirkpatrick, M. and Servedio, M.R. 1999. The reinforcement of mating preferences on an island. Genetics, 151: 865-884.
20. Laland, K.N. 1994. On the evolutionary consequences of sexual imprinting. Evolution, 48: 477-489.
21. Lambrechts, M.M., Blondel, J., Hurtrez-Bousses, S., Maistre, M. and Perret, P. 1997. Adaptive inter-population differences in blue tit life-history traits on Corsica. Evol. Ecol., 11: 599-612.
22. Maynard Smith, J. 1985. Sexual selection, handicaps and true fitness. J. Theor. Biol., 115: 1-8.
23. McPeek, M.A. and Holt, R.D. 1992. The evolution of dispersal in spatially and temporally varying environments. Am. Nat., 140: 1010-1027.
24. Merkel, G. 1977. The effects of temperature and food quality on the larval development of Gryllus bimaculatus (Orthoptera, Gryllidae). Oecologia, 30: 129-140.
25. O'Donald, P. 1980. Genetic Models of Sexual Selection. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Orr, H.A. and Coyne, J. A. 1992. The genetics of adaptation: a reassessment. Am. Nat., 140: 725-742.
27. Proulx, S.R. 1999. Mating systems and the evolution of the niche. Am. Nat., 154: 89-98.
28. Proulx, S.R. 2001. Female choice via indicator traits easily evolves in the face of recombination and migration. Evolution, 55: 2401-2411.
29. Pulliam, H.R. 1988. Sources, sinks, and population regulation. Am. Nat., 132: 652-661.
30. Riechert, S.E. 1993a. Investigation of potential gene flow limitation of behavioral adaptation in an aridlands spider. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 32: 355-363.
31. Riechert, S.E. 1993b. A test for phylogenetic constraints on behavioral adaptation in a spider system. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 32: 343-348.
32. Riechert, S.E. and Hall, R.F. 2000. Local population success in heterogeneous habitats: reciprocal transplant experiments completed on a desert spider. J. Evol. Biol., 13: 541-550.
33. Seger, J. 1985. Unifying genetic models for the evolution of female choice. Evolution, 39: 1185-1193.
34. Shmida, A. and Ellner, S. 1984. Coexistence of plant species with similar niches. Vegetatio, 58: 29-55.
35. Simchuk, A.P., Ivashov, A.V. and Companiytsev, V.A. 1999. Genetic patterns as possible factors causing population cycles in oak leafroller moth, Tortrix viridana L. Forest Ecol. Manage., 113: 35-49.
36. Simmons, L.W. 1987. Heritability of a male character chosen by females of the field cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 21: 129-133.
37. Travis, J.M.J., Murrell, D.J. and Dytham, C. 1999. The evolution of density-dependent dispersal. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 266: 1837-1842.
38. Watt, W.B., Carter, P.A. and Blower, S.M. 1985. Adaptation at specific loci. IV. Differential mating success among glycolytic allozyme genotypes of colias butterflies. Science, 233: 1187-1190.
39. Wilson, H.B. 2001. The evolution of dispersal from source to sink populations. Evol. Ecol. Res., 3: 27-35.
40. Zahavi, A. 1975. Mate selection: a selection for a handicap. J. Theor. Biol., 53: 205-214.