The evolution of dispersal from source to sink populations

Evolutionary Ecology Research

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 27-33

  Wilson, Howard B ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Dispersal; Evolution; Migration; Population models; Source sink; Spatial heterogeneity

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002347722     PISSN: 15220613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bergerud, A.T. 1988. Caribou, wolves and man. TREE, 3: 68-73.
2. Brown, J.S. and Pavlovic, N.B. 1992. Evolution in heterogeneous environments: Effects of migration on habitat specialisation. Evol. Ecol., 6: 360-382.
3. Bull, J.J., Thompson, D.N. and Moore, R. 1987. A model for natural selection of genetic migration. Am. Nat., 129: 143-157.
4. Dias, P.C. 1996. Sources and sinks in population biology. TREE, 11: 326-330.
5. Dias, P.C., Verheyen, G.R. and Raymond, M. 1996. Source-sink populations in Mediterranean blue tits: Evidence using single locus mini-satellite probes. J. Evol. Biol., 9: 965-978.
6. Doak, D.F. 1995. Source-sink models and the problem of habitat degradation - general models and applications to the Yellowstone grizzly. Conserv. Biol., 9: 1370-1379.
7. Doebeli, M. 1991. Dispersal and dynamics. Theor. Pop. Biol., 47: 82-106.
8. Eriksson, O. 1996. Regional dynamics of plants - a review of evidence for remnant, source-sink metapopulations. Oikos, 77: 248-258.
9. Gaggiotti, O.E. and Smouse, P.E. 1996. Stochastic migration and the maintenance of genetic variation in sink populations. Am. Nat., 147: 919-945.
10. Hassell, M.P. 1975. Density dependence in single-species populations. J. Anim. Ecol., 44: 283-295.
11. Hastings, A. 1980. Disturbance, coexistence, history and competition for space. Theor. Pop. Biol., 18: 363-373.
12. Holt, R.D. 1985. Population dynamics in two-patch environments: Some anomalous consequences of an optimal habitat distribution. Theor. Pop. Biol., 28: 181-208.
13. Holt, R.D. 1996. Adaptive evolution in source-sink environments: Direct and indirect effects of density-dependence on niche evolution. Oikos, 75: 182-192.
14. Holt, R.D. and Gaines, M.S. 1992. Analysis of adaptation in heterogeneous landscapes: Implications for the evolution of fundamental niches. Evol. Ecol., 6: 433-447.
15. Howe, R.W., Davis, G.J. and Mosca, V. 1991. The demographic significance of sink populations. Biol. Conserv., 57: 239-255.
16. Hutchinson, G.E. 1958. Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol., 22: 415-427.
17. Kawecki, T.J. 1995. Demography of source-sink populations and the evolution of ecological niches. Evol. Ecol., 9: 38-44.
18. Keddy, P.A. 1981. Experimental demography of the sand-dune annual Cakile edentula, growing along an environmental gradient in Nova Scotia. J. Ecol., 69: 615-630.
19. McPeek, M.A. and Holt, R.D. 1992. The evolution of dispersal in spatially and temporally varying environments. Am. Nat., 140: 1010-1027.
20. Morris, D.W. 1991. On the evolutionary stability of dispersal to sink habitats. Am. Nat., 137: 907-911.
21. Pulliam, H.R. 1988. Sources, sinks and population regulation. Am. Nat., 132: 652-661.
22. Pulliam, H.R. and Danielson, B.J. 1991. Sources, sinks and habitat selection - a landscape perspective on population dynamics. Am. Nat., 137: S50-S66.
23. Shmida, A. and Ellner, S. 1984. Coexistence of plant species with similar niches. Vegetatio, 58: 29-55.
24. Van Tienderen, P.H. 1991. Evolution of generalists and specialists in spatially heterogeneous environments. Evolution, 45: 1317-1331.
25. Watkinson, A.R. 1985. On the abundance of plants along an environmental gradient. J. Ecol., 73: 569-578.
26. Watkinson, A.R. and Sutherland, W.J. 1995. Sources, sinks and pseudo-sinks. J. Anim. Ecol., 64: 126-130.
27. Wooton, J.T. and Bell, D.A. 1992. A metapopulation model of the peregrine falcon in California: Viability and management strategies. Ecol. Appl., 2: 307-321.