Measuring the recreational value of open space

Journal of Agricultural Economics

Volumn 54, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 269-283

  Fleischer, Aliza ^a   Tsur, Yacov ^a,b  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; MEASUREMENT METHOD; OUTDOOR RECREATION; RECREATIONAL ACTIVITY;

ISRAEL;

EID: 0042014370     PISSN: 0021857X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-9552.2003.tb00063.x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Ben Akiva, M. and Lerman, S.R. (1985). Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
2. Bockstael, N.E., Hanemann, M.W. and Kling, C. (1987). Estimating the Value of Water Quality Improvements in a Recreational Demand Framework, Water Resources Research 23 (5) :951-60.
3. Bockstael, N.E., Hanemann, M.W. and Strand, I.E. Jr. (1986). Measuring the Benefits of Water Quality Improvements Using Recreation Demand Models. Report to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. College Park, MD: University of Maryland.
4. Bockstael, N.E., McConnell, K.E. and Strand, I.E. (1991). Recreation. In Braden, J.B. and Kolstad, C.D. (eds.) Measuring the Demand for Environmental Quality. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. North Holland, New York. pp. 227-270.
5. Cordell, H.K., Lewis, B. and McDonald, B.L. (1995). Long-term Outdoor Recreation Participation Trends. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Outdoor Recreation & Tourism Trends Symposium and the 1995 National Recreation Resource Planning Conference. Sponsored by: University of Minnesota, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, National Association of Recreation Resource Planners.
6. Creel, M. and Loomis, J. (1992). Recreation Value of Water to Wetlands in the San Joaquin Valley: Linked Multinomial Logit and Count Data Trip Frequency Models, Water Resources Research 28 (10) :2597-2606.
7. English, D.B.K., Betz, C.J., Young, J.M., Bergstromm, J.C. and Cordell, H.K. (1990). Regional Demand and Supply Projections for Outdoor Recreation. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, General Technical Report RM-230, Fort Collins, Colorado.
8. Ewer, A.W. (1995). Current Trends in Risk Recreation: The Impacts of Technology, Demographics, and Related Variables. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Outdoor Recreation & Tourism Trends Symposium and the 1995 National Recreation Resource Planning Conference. Sponsored by: University of Minnesota, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, National Association of Recreation Resource Planners.
9. Feather, P. and Shaw, D.W. (1999). Estimating the cost of leisure time for recreation demand model. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 38:49-65.
10. Feather, P., Hellerstein, D. and Tomasi, T. (1995). A discrete-count model of recreation demand. Journal of Environmental Economics Management, 29:214-227.
11. Freeman, A.M. (1993). The Measurement of Environmental and Resources Values: Theory and Methods. Resources for the Future, Baltimore M.D.: John Hopkins University Press.
12. Gourieroux, C., Monfort, A. and Trognon, A. (1980). Pseudo Maximum Likelihood Methods: Application to Poisson Models. Econometrica, 52,710-720.
13. Hanemann, W. M. (1984). Discrete-Continuous Models of Consumer Demand. Econometrica, 52(3): 541-61.
14. Hausman, J.A., Leonard, G.K. and McFadden, D. (1995). A utility-consistent, combined discrete choice and count data model - assessing recreational use losses due to natural resources damage. Journal of Public Economics, 56(1): 1-30.
15. Kaoru, Y., Smith, V.K. and Liu, J.L. (1995). Using Random Utility-Models to Estimate the Recreational Value of Estuarine Resources. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77(1): 141-151.
16. Levia, D.F. and Page, D.R. (2000). The Use of Cluster Analysis in Distinguishing Farmland Prone to Residential; Development: A Case Study of Sterling, Massachusetts. Environmental Management, 25(5): 541-548.
17. Lockeretz, W. (1989). Secondary Effects on Midwestern Agriculture of Metropolitan Development and Decrease in Farmland. Land Economics, 65: 205-216.
18. Lupi, F. and Feather, P.M., (1998). Using Partial Site Aggregation to Reduce Bias in Random Utility Travel Cost Models, Water Resources Research, 34(12):3595-3603.
19. McFadden, D. (1978). Modelling the Choice of Residential Location, In Karlquist, A. et al. Spatial Interaction Theory and Residential Location, North-Holland, New York, pp.75-96.
20. McFadden, D. (1981). Econometrics Models for Probabilistic Choice Models, in Manski, C. and McFadden, D. (eds.) Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Applications. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. pp. 198-272.
21. Morey, E.R., Rowe, R.D. and Watson, A. (1993). A Repeated Nested-Logit Model of Atlantic Salmon Fishing. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 75(3):578-592.
22. Parsons, G., Jakus, P. and Tomasi, T. (1999). A Comparison of Welfare Estimates from Four Models for Linking Seasonal Recreational Trips to Multinomial Logit Models of Sites Choice, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 38(1): 143-57.
23. Parsons, G.R. and Kealy, M.J. (1995). A Demand Theory of Number of Trips in a Random Utility Model of Recreation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 29:357-367.
24. Parsons, G.R. and Needelman, M. (1992). Site Aggregation in a Random Utility Model of Recreation, Land Economics, 68:418-433.
25. Small, K.A. and Rosen, H.S. (1981). Applied Welfare Economics with Discrete Choice Model. Econometrica 49(1): 105-130.
26. Romano, D., Scarpa, R., Spalatro, F. and Vigano, L. (2000). Modelling Determinants of Participation, Number of Trips and Site Choice for Outdoor Recreation in Protected Areas. Journal of Agricultural Economics 51(2): 224-238.
27. Shaw, W.D. and Shonkwiler, J.S. (2000). Brand Choice and Purchase Frequency Revisited: An Application to Recreation Behaviour, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 82(3): 515-526.
28. Yen, J.S., and Adamowicz, V. (1994). Participation, Trip Frequency and Site Choice: A Multinomial Poisson Hurdle Model of Recreation Demand, Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 42(2):65-76.