Henkel plots of single-domain ferromagnetic particles

Journal of Applied Physics

Volumn 87, Issue 10, 2000, Pages 7376-7381

  Garcia Otero J ^a   Porto, M ^b   Rivas, J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SANTIAGO DE COMPOSTELA   (Spain)

^b TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041960351     PISSN: 00218979     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.372996     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. G. W. D. Spratt, P. R. Bissel, R. W. Chantrell, and E. P. Wohlfarth, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 75, 309 (1988).
2. P. E. Kelly, K. O'Grady, P. I. Mayo, and R. W. Chantrell, IEEE Trans. Magn. 25, 3881 (1989).
3. P. I. Mayo et al., IEEE Trans. Magn. 26, 228 (1990).
4. M. El-Hilo, K. O'Grady, P. I. Mayo, and R. W. Chantrell, IEEE Trans. Magn. 28, 3282 (1992).
5. G. P. Heydon et al., J. Phys. D 30, 1083 (1997).
6. O. Henkel, Phys. Status Solidi 7, 919 (1964).
7. E. C. Stoner and E. P. Wohlfarth, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 240, 599 (1948); reprinted in IEEE Trans. Magn. 27, 3475 (1991).
8. E. C. Stoner and E. P. Wohlfarth, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 240, 599 (1948); reprinted in IEEE Trans. Magn. 27, 3475 (1991).
9. I. Klick, Y. D. Yao, and C. R. Chang, J. Appl. Phys. 81, 5230 (1997).
10. E. P. Wohlfarth, J. Appl. Phys. 29, 595 (1958).
11. S. W. de Leeuw, J. W. Perram, and E. R. Smith, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 373, 27 (1980).
12. M. P. Allen and D. J. Tildesley, Computer Simulation of Liquids (Clarendon, Oxford, 1987).
13. K. Binder and D. W. Heermann, Monte Carlo Simulations in Stastical Physics, Springer Series in Solid State Science Vol. 80, 2nd ed. (Springer, Berlin, 1992).
14. B. The values chosen (ρ*,T*) belong to the liquid phase (Ref. 11). Of course, for systems without dipolar interaction (i.e., concentration c = 0) the total energy is independent of the particles' positions.
15. D. A. Dimitrov and G. M. Wysin, Phys. Rev. B 54, 9237 (1996).
16. J. García-Otero, M. Porto, J. Rivas, and A. Bunde, J. Appl. Phys. 85, 2287 (1999).
17. J. García-Otero, M. Porto, J. Rivas, and A. Bunde, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 167 (2000).
18. 0 = 2.15. Thus, the largest concentration considered in this work corresponds to c = 0.46 for ion-nitride nanoparticles and c = 0.69 for maghemite particles.
19. 0 = 2.15. Thus, the largest concentration considered in this work corresponds to c = 0.46 for ion-nitride nanoparticles and c = 0.69 for maghemite particles.